On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 09:07 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
This is why i think something like yum list vendors could be nice, i
could show something like this
foo-1.0-1.fc7.i386 Vendor X
bar-1.0-2.fc7.noarch Vendor Y
seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 09:07 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
This is why i think something like yum list vendors could be nice, i
could show something like this
foo-1.0-1.fc7.i386 Vendor X
bar-1.0-2.fc7.noarch Vendor
Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007 19:37 schrieb seth vidal:
Some other brainstorms as I've been sitting around and talking to folks
on jabber and irc. Some of these are things to add into yum, others are
just things to implement as yum-utils - but feedback on the stupidity of
some of these items is
Charlie Brady wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, James Bowes wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
* Switch from cvs to git
is git the clear winner on the distributed SCM wars? I always lose
track.
Yes.
In some circles, perhaps. Mercurial is also widely used, very easy to
use and does a very good job.
I
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
* yum list vendors
List install packages and the rpm vendors, there have been a
lot of
discussions on
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
* yum list vendors
List install packages
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:55:03AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
could show something like this
foo-1.0-1.fc7.i386 Vendor X
bar-1.0-2.fc7.noarch Vendor Y
is there a sensible
seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Michael E Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 03:01 +0200, Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
5. yum-gate - take the code that rnorwood posted and maybe work on
making it more releasable for folks to
Figured I'd post a few votes on these as one of the owners of a large
environment using yum. I love using the hard work going on here as an
example of how open source produces a better product than proprietary
processes.
Keep up the good work!
On 5/3/07, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
Some other brainstorms as I've been sitting around and talking to folks
on jabber and irc. Some of these are things to add into yum, others are
just things to implement as yum-utils - but feedback on the stupidity of
some of these items is welcome, in no particular order:
1.
Hi,
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
5. yum-gate - take the code that rnorwood posted and maybe work on
making it more releasable for folks to use as an authenticated yum repo.
Alternatively, look at one
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:11:46PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:18 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
* yum list vendors
List install packages and the rpm vendors, there have been a lot of
discussions on the EPEL list, about repotag as a way to locate the
source
Some other brainstorms as I've been sitting around and talking to folks
on jabber and irc. Some of these are things to add into yum, others are
just things to implement as yum-utils - but feedback on the stupidity of
some of these items is welcome, in no particular order:
1. supporting gpg/x509
1. supporting gpg/x509 signatures detached from repomd.xml on each repo
- so we can check the content for validity
Is sqlite repo-data still on your list or have you changed
your mind on this?
regards,
Florian La Roche
___
Yum-devel mailing list
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 19:43 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
1. supporting gpg/x509 signatures detached from repomd.xml on each repo
- so we can check the content for validity
Is sqlite repo-data still on your list or have you changed
your mind on this?
it's already in place.
that's in
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:37:39PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
Some other brainstorms as I've been sitting around and talking to folks
on jabber and irc. Some of these are things to add into yum, others are
just things to implement as yum-utils - but feedback on the stupidity of
some of these
Michael E Brown wrote:
Well, this is yum, so of course they are all silly.
This is the best thing I've read today. Thanks, Mr Brown.
-James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Yum-devel mailing list
Yum-devel@linux.duke.edu
On 5/2/07, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any of those things seem cool or silly?
What would be cool, is the following behaviour:
1. I run yum install foo
2. libbar, libbaz, and libquux are installed as deps
3. I decide I don't like foo, and run yum erase foo
4. Yum looks at requires and
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On 5/2/07, seth vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any of those things seem cool or silly?
What would be cool, is the following behaviour:
1. I run yum install foo
2. libbar, libbaz, and libquux are installed as deps
3. I decide I don't like foo, and run yum erase
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 13:37 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
1. supporting gpg/x509 signatures detached from repomd.xml on each repo
- so we can check the content for validity
Sounds like a good thing to have
2. yum-util system-sync - to make two systems more or less identical
pkg-wise to each other
seth vidal wrote:
Some other brainstorms as I've been sitting around and talking to folks
on jabber and irc. Some of these are things to add into yum, others are
just things to implement as yum-utils - but feedback on the stupidity of
some of these items is welcome, in no particular order:
22 matches
Mail list logo
