On 13 November, 2006 - Sanjeev Bagewadi sent me these 7,1K bytes:
Tomas,
comments inline...
arc::print struct arc
{
anon = ARC_anon
mru = ARC_mru
mru_ghost = ARC_mru_ghost
mfu = ARC_mfu
mfu_ghost = ARC_mfu_ghost
size = 0x6f7a400
p =
Tomas Ögren writes:
On 13 November, 2006 - Sanjeev Bagewadi sent me these 7,1K bytes:
Tomas,
comments inline...
arc::print struct arc
{
anon = ARC_anon
mru = ARC_mru
mru_ghost = ARC_mru_ghost
mfu = ARC_mfu
Howdy Robert.
Robert Milkowski wrote:
You've got the same behavior with any LVM when you replace a disk.
So it's not something unexpected for admins. Also most of the time
they expect LVM to resilver ASAP. With default setting not being 100%
you'll definitely see people complaining ZFS is
Maybe something like the slow parameter of VxVM?
slow[=iodelay]
Reduces toe system performance impact of copy
operations. Such operations are usually per-
formed on small regions of the volume (nor-
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 13 November, 2006 - Sanjeev Bagewadi sent me these 7,1K bytes:
Tomas,
comments inline...
arc::print struct arc
{
anon = ARC_anon
mru = ARC_mru
mru_ghost = ARC_mru_ghost
mfu = ARC_mfu
mfu_ghost = ARC_mfu_ghost
size = 0x6f7a400
p = 0x5d9bd5a
Hello Jason,
Friday, November 3, 2006, 4:54:04 AM, you wrote:
JJWW Hi Robert,
JJWW Out of curiosity would it be possible to see the same test but hitting
JJWW the disk with write operations instead of read?
Sorry... I really wanted to and I'm afraid I won't find enough time
before my vacations
Hi Mike,
Yes, outside of the hot-spares feature, you can detach, offline, and
replace existing devices in a pool, but you can't remove devices, yet.
This feature work is being tracked under this RFE:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4852783
Cindy
Mike Seda wrote:
Matt:
What's your contact information so that I can send that information to you?
My apologies for taking so long to get back to this.
Sincerely,
Ewen
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Hi,
not sure whether there is a minimum physical
memory requirement to run zfs?
i noticed the free phyiscal memory dropped
quickly while doing dd on zfs files:
kthr memorypagedisk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr m1 m1 m1 m2 in
Hello Cecilia,
Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 3:01:42 AM, you wrote:
CL Hi,
CL
CL not sure whether there is a minimum physical
CL memory requirement to run zfs?
Generally requirements are similar if you would use different file
system.
CL i noticed the free phyiscal memory dropped
CL
Sorry for the delay...
No, it doesn't. The format command shows the drive, but zpool import does not
find any pools. I've also used the detached bad SATA drive for testing; no go.
Once a drive is detached, there seems to be no (not enough?) information about
the pool that allows import.
I
On 11/13/06, Robert Milkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally requirements are similar if you would use different file
system.
CL i noticed the free phyiscal memory dropped
CL quickly while doing dd on zfs files:
It's because ZFS doesn't use page cache and it uses kernel memory.
Side
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Torrey,
Friday, November 10, 2006, 11:31:31 PM, you wrote:
TM Robert Milkowski wrote:
Also scrub can consume all CPU power on smaller and older
machines and
that's not always what I would like.
REP The big question, though, is 10% of
Hello Rainer,
Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 4:43:32 AM, you wrote:
RH Sorry for the delay...
RH No, it doesn't. The format command shows the drive, but zpool
RH import does not find any pools. I've also used the detached bad
RH SATA drive for testing; no go. Once a drive is detached, there
RH
14 matches
Mail list logo
