Hello eric,
Thursday, February 22, 2007, 5:44:35 PM, you wrote:
ek On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Carisdad wrote:
I've seen very good performance on streaming large files to ZFS on
a T2000. We have been looking at using the T2000 as a disk storage
unit for backups. I've been able to push
Hi All,
this morning one of our edge fc switches died. Thanks to multipath all the
nodes using that switch keeps running except the ONLY ONE still using ZFS (we
went back to UFS on all our production servers) !
In that one we had one path failed and than a CPU panic :(
Here is the logs:
Feb
So, that would be an error, and, other than reporting it accurately, what
would you want ZFS to do to support it?
dudekula mastan wrote:
If a write call attempted to write X bytes of data, and if writecall
writes only x ( hwere x X) bytes, then we call that write as short write.
-Masthan
Hi folks,
I want to try to port ZFS under OpenBSD, but I'm not able to find the archive
of the source code of this filesystem.
Please, how can I do?
Thanks in advance
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Dan Mick wrote:
So, that would be an error, and, other than reporting it accurately, what
would you want ZFS to do to support it?
It's not an error for write(2) to return with less bytes written than
requested. In some situations, that's pretty much expected. Like, for
Ludovic Gele wrote:
I want to try to port ZFS under OpenBSD, but I'm not able to find the
archive of the source code of this filesystem.
Please, how can I do?
Hi Ludovic,
ZFS is integrated into Solaris and OpenSolaris. There's no
explicitly separate source code archive.
If you want to learn
1) Take a look at the ZFS Source Tour:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/source/
2) You may also want to talk to the FreeBSD zfs port maintainer:
http://perforce.freebsd.org/depotTreeBrowser.cgi?FSPC=//depot/user/pjd/zfs
3) The source of ZFS is in a few different directories:
Main FS
On Feb 22, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Eric Schrock wrote:
[ ... ]
b) It is not uncommon for such successful reads of partially
defective
media to happen only after several retries. It is somewhat
unfortunate
that there is no simple way to tell the drive how many times to
retry.
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Adrian Saul wrote:
Any idea on the timeline or future of zfs split ?
It isn't a priority for now.
For Sun, for the ZFS community, or both?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello Jeff,
Friday, February 23, 2007, 4:18:53 PM, you wrote:
JV Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Adrian Saul wrote:
Any idea on the timeline or future of zfs split ?
It isn't a priority for now.
JV For Sun, for the ZFS community, or both?
For developers currently working on ZFS?
If you want to
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Friday, February 23, 2007, 4:18:53 PM, you wrote:
JV Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Adrian Saul wrote:
Any idea on the timeline or future of zfs split ?
It isn't a priority for now.
JV For Sun, for the ZFS community, or both?
For developers currently working on
Hypothetical question.
Say you have one 6140 controller tray and one 6140 expansion tray. In
the beginning, these are connected to a 5220 or 5320 NAS appliance.
Then, say you get a Sun server, a X4100, and connect it to the 6140
controller tray (the 6140 supports multiple data hosts). Is it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/23/2007 02:15:44 PM:
Is there anyway to convert existing ufs file system to zfs ?
Not live, good old tape-restore or transfer to new disk methods only. You
may minimize downtime depending on workload by doing a disk-disk copy live
and then doing an rsync
Yes. Works fine, though it's an interim solution until I can get rid of
PowerPath.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
For a quick overview of setting up MPxIO and the other configs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# fcinfo hba-port
HBA Port WWN: 1000c952776f
OS Device Name: /dev/cfg/c8
Manufacturer: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Model: LP1-S
Type: N-port
State: online
Actually, I'm using ZFS in a SAN environment often importing LUNS to save
management overhead and make snapshots easily available, among other things. I
would love zfs remove because it allows me, in conjunction with containers, to
build up a single managable pool for a number of local host
16 matches
Mail list logo
