Richard Elling wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
If you had known about the drive sizes beforehand, the you could have
done something like this:
Partition the drives as follows:
A: 1 20GB partition
B: 1 20gb 1 10GB partition
C: 1 40GB partition
D: 1 40GB partition 2 10GB paritions
then you
Oliver Schinagl wrote:
The only thing I haven't found in zfs yet, is metadata etc info.
The previous 'next best thing' in FS was of course ReiserFS (4). Reiser3
was quite a nice thing, fast, journaled and all that, but Reiser4
promised to bring all those things that we see emerging now, like
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Hi,
In brief, what I am trying to do is to use libzpool to access a zpool -
like ztest does.
[snip]
No, AFAIK, the pool is not damaged. But yes, it looks like the device
can't be written to by the userland zfs.
Well, I might have figured out something.
Turssing the
superbe job...synaptic package manager is really impressive
is there a way to transform Sun package to a synaptic package?
selim
On 6/22/07, Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Erast Benson wrote:
New unstable ISO of NexentaCP (Core Platform) available.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2007 06:25:47 PM:
The only thing I haven't found in zfs yet, is metadata etc info.
The previous 'next best thing' in FS was of course ReiserFS (4). Reiser3
was quite a nice thing, fast, journaled and all that, but Reiser4
promised to bring all those
just use pkgadd -d wrapper. it will auto-magically convert SVR4
package to the .deb(s) and install them on the fly. You can also use
pkgrm to remove them. pkginfo wrapper is also available.
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 16:38 +0200, Selim Daoud wrote:
superbe job...synaptic package manager is really
On 28-Jun-07, at 11:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/27/2007 06:25:47 PM:
The only thing I haven't found in zfs yet, is metadata etc info.
The previous 'next best thing' in FS was of course ReiserFS (4).
Reiser3
was quite a nice thing, fast, journaled
zfs encryption has been updated ...just in case
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/zfs-crypto/plan/
s.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
The ZFS Crypto project is nearing completion of the design for phase 1.
A two week design review will be held starting with the publication of
the phase 1 design document on Monday 2nd July. I will also arrange a
1hr conference call to discuss issues interactively.
Details of where to find
I guess the userdefinable properties is then what i'm looking for. Well
not what *I* am looking for perse. i was reading the article on Hans
Reiser, the one over at wired, good read btw,
(http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/15-07/ff_hansreiser?currentPage=1).
Somewhere it stated that
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Hi,
In brief, what I am trying to do is to use libzpool to access a zpool
- like ztest does.
[snip]
No, AFAIK, the pool is not damaged. But yes, it looks like the device
can't be written to by the userland zfs.
Well, I might have figured out
On 28-Jun-07, at 4:46 PM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
I guess the userdefinable properties is then what i'm looking for.
Well
not what *I* am looking for perse. i was reading the article on Hans
Reiser, the one over at wired, good read btw,
Oh i just ment it was generally a good read :) Nicely written and the
likes. It just mentions a little part about RFS4 and that the 'new'
thing introduced by RFS4 was the ability to search through the metadata
extremly fast.
Personally, I don't really use all this search nonsense. Wait, that's a
I guess my real question should have been, IF it turns out that quick
indexing and the like are really the next hot thing, would ZFS support
it (yes from what i gathered earlier on this list).
rant modeCome to think of it, the biggest difference of putting this
info in the FS layer or
14 matches
Mail list logo
