Lally Singh wrote:
Looks great.. Any (long-term distant-future) plans of integrating this
with the Trusted Extensions for a real quick setup?
For you what would integrated with Trusted Extensions mean ?
They certainly work together just fine, but I want to better understand
what you are
Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
Hi;
Do any of you know when ZFS remote mirroring will be available ?
Depends on exactly what you mean by remote mirroring ?
Please explain exactly what you mean by this because there are many
different definitions. Some of which ZFS already meets others it
I tried to mean continous data replication between different systems.
Mertol Ozyoney
Storage Practice - Sales Manager
Sun Microsystems, TR
Istanbul TR
Phone +902123352200
Mobile +905339310752
Fax +90212335
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
I tried to mean continous data replication between different systems.
Still not enough information.
How many systems, are all of them expected to be read/write at all times ?
Is HA cluster software (such as Sun Cluster) involved ?
Does the replication need to be
I know I havent defined my particular needs. However I am looking for a
simple explanation of waht is available today and what will be available in
short term.
Example. One to one asynch replication is suported, many to one synch
replication supported etc
Regards
Mertol
Mertol
Mertol,
Hi;
Do any of you know when ZFS remote mirroring will be available ?
Host-based replication of ZFS, and all other Solaris filesystems is
available using Sun StorageTek Available Suite. AVS has been part of
OpenSolaris since build 68.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/
Yes, I think that was the original intent of the project proposal. It
could probably be reworded to decrease emphasis on a single algorithm,
but I read it as a generic exploration of alternative algorithms.
Yes, you read right. The original intent was to investigate
alternative algorithms in
Hi,
back after half a year ...
... and still, after reading documents for the last half day, I am not
a bit wiser.
Someone had promised to update (and simplify) some examples, but - at
least to me - that hasn't happened. :(
[Just read the 'Legacy Mount Points', and tell me as beginner, what to do
Hi all.
I've been running the ZFS boot netinstall setup on SXCE's snv_69 and
snv_70 very happily. I'm anticipating the release of xVM with build 75,
and wondering if the same ZFS install procedure is likely to work, or if
I'll be left waiting further for more changes.
I understand that this
I am trying to test a new setup of NV74. I have set up the system with ZFS
boot. Everything works fine until I pull a drive. The system locks up when I
try to run any command e.g. zpool status. There is no communication with the
server from then on. It does not even respond to pings.
On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
I know I havent defined my particular needs. However I am looking
for a
simple explanation of waht is available today and what will be
available in
short term.
Example. One to one asynch replication is suported, many to one synch
Hello Mike,
Saturday, October 20, 2007, 3:21:16 AM, you wrote:
The ideal situation it would go like:
host1# zpool export pool
host2# zpool import pool
If you know (really know) that it is offline on the other server (e.g. you can verify the host is dead), you can use:
# zpool import
Hello Mertol,
Friday, October 19, 2007, 10:49:13 PM, you wrote:
Hi;
In summary they want to take the control of a ZFS pool if the primary server fails for some reason. I know we can do it with Sun Cluster how ever this is pretty complex and expensive .
Well, Sun Cluster is
If it's just for recovery purposes, try 'zpool import -f -R /mnt pool'.
Because there isn't a 1:1 correspondence between filesystems and pools,
it isn't possible to just mount a filesystem without importing the pool.
And every ZFS filesystem must be part of a pool, so I'm not sure what
you mean
I don't think that SATA controller is supported by the SATA framework
(you may want to ask storage-discuss), so it's operating in legacy
(PATA) mode. Legacy mode doesn't support hotplug. The FMA code should
eventually diagnose this drive as faulty, and there is a fix in the
works to sidestep
On 10/18/07, Neil Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The umem one is unavailable, but the Gigabyte model is easy to find.
I had Amazon overnight one to me, it's probably sitting at home right
now.
Cool let us know how it goes.
Not so well. I was completely unable to get the card to work
I need to format a zfs iscsi target as ntfs (Samba + ADS got the best
of me). How do you recommend setting up the software for optimal
stability? My main concern is how I will handle growing the partition
down the road. Any advice from those experienced in a setup like this
is much appreciated.
On 10/22/07, Scott Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oct 20 12:50:54 fs2 ahci: [ID 632458 kern.warning] WARNING:
ahci_port_reset: port 1 the device hardware has been initialized and
the power-up diagnostics failed
IIRC, Gigabyte cheaped out and didn't implement SMART. Thus,
everything that tries
Jeff Creek wrote:
I posted this in ZFS-Discuss. Eric Schrock suggested I ask in this forum.
I am trying to test a new setup of NV74. I have set up the system with ZFS
boot. Everything works fine until I pull a drive. The system locks up when I
try to run any command e.g. zpool status.
Looking for a way to mount a zfs filesystem ontop of another zfs filesystem
without resorting to legacy mode.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Looking for a way to mount a zfs filesystem ontop of another zfs
filesystem without resorting to legacy mode.
doesn't simply 'zfs set mountpoint=...' work for you?
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
A few things come to mind:
* Attaching a label to the zfs filesystem, so I can't mount the FS in
an unlabeled or differently-labeled zone if I don't want to.
(multiple labels for shared fs's would be cool, too.)
* Connecting the startup of the trusted zone (I'm still learning this
stuff, sorry if
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Looking for a way to mount a zfs filesystem ontop
of another zfs
filesystem without resorting to legacy mode.
doesn't simply 'zfs set mountpoint=...' work for you?
--
Michael Schuster
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:41:57AM -0700, Michael Schuster wrote:
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Looking for a way to mount a zfs filesystem ontop of another zfs
filesystem without resorting to legacy mode.
doesn't simply 'zfs set mountpoint=...' work for you?
Does this have boot-time problems? I
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:16:21PM -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote:
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Looking for a way to mount a zfs filesystem ontop
of another zfs
filesystem without resorting to legacy mode.
doesn't simply 'zfs set mountpoint=...' work for you?
--
Michael Schuster
No boot problems. The zfs filesystems are in the same pool. What would be nice
is something like
zfs set mountorder=1 local/apps
zfs set mountorder=2 local/apps-bin
or something along that line. So one zfs filesystem can be reliably mounted to
a point inside another zfs filesystem.
This
M D wrote:
No boot problems. The zfs filesystems are in the same pool. What would
be nice is something like
zfs set mountorder=1 local/apps
zfs set mountorder=2 local/apps-bin
or something along that line. So one zfs filesystem can be reliably
mounted to a point inside another zfs
27 matches
Mail list logo
