On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote:
That doesn't work either.
The zpool replace command didn't work? You wouldn't happen to have a copy
of the errors you received, would you? I'd like to see that.
Regards,
markm
___
zfs-discuss mailing
What would be the commands for the three way mirror or an example of what your
describing. I thought the 200gb would have to be the same size to attach to the
existing mirror and you would have to attach two LUN disks vs one LUN. Once it
attaches it automatically reslivers or syncs the disk
Use zpool replace to swap one side of the mirror with the iscsi lun.
-- mikee
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Tue Jan 15 08:46:40 2008
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Moving zfs to an iscsci
Hello Kory,
Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 1:46:40 PM, you wrote:
KW What would be the commands for the three way mirror or an example
KW of what your describing. I thought the 200gb would have to be the
KW same size to attach to the existing mirror and you would have to
KW attach two LUN disks vs
Veritas products tend to work best with... well... other Veritas products.
On 1/11/08, Patrick Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello experts,
We have a large implementation of Symantec Netbackup 6.0 with disk staging.
Today, the customer is using VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0
with zfs you can compress data on disk ...that is a grat advantage
when doing backup to disk
also, for DSSU you need to multiply number of filesystem (1 fs per
stu), the advantage of zfs is that you don't need to fix the size
of the fs upfront (the space is shared among all the fs)
s-
On Jan 10,
On 1/15/08, Selim Daoud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with zfs you can compress data on disk ...that is a grat advantage
when doing backup to disk
also, for DSSU you need to multiply number of filesystem (1 fs per
stu), the advantage of zfs is that you don't need to fix the size
of the fs upfront
Hello Kevin,
Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 7:53:47 PM, you wrote:
KR What does the REFER column represent in zfs list.
How much data given dataset is referring to - in other words its a
disk usage for that file system (not counting snapshots iirc).
--
Best regards,
Robert Milkowski
Regarding the question asked below namely What happens when the free
space reported by ZFS isn't really the free space ?, is there an open
bug for this ?
Thanks,
Sri
Paul Kraus wrote:
On 1/15/08, Selim Daoud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with zfs you can compress data on disk ...that is a
Sri Sudarsan wrote:
Regarding the question asked below namely What happens when the free
space reported by ZFS isn't really the free space ?, is there an open
bug for this ?
Not a bug. It is a result of the dynamic nature of ZFS. For example,
when compression is enabled, we cannot tell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/15/2008 03:04:15 PM:
Sri
Paul Kraus wrote:
On 1/15/08, Selim Daoud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with zfs you can compress data on disk ...that is a grat advantage
when doing backup to disk
also, for DSSU you need to multiply number of filesystem (1 fs per
AFAIK , nbu does of estimated the size of backup prior starting the job.
as the backup job is split in fixed-size segments , if a segment does
not fit, it will try to backup into
another disk or will wait for more space
On Jan 15, 2008 8:42 PM, Paul Kraus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/15/08,
I made a really stupid mistake... having trouble removing a hot spare
marked as failed I was trying several ways to put it back in a good
state. One means I tried was to 'zpool add pool c5t3d0'... but I forgot
to use the proper syntax zpool add pool spare c5t3d0.
Now I'm in a bind. I've got
There's really no way to recover from this, since we don't have device
removal. However, I'm suprised that no warning was given. There are at
least two things that should have happened:
1. zpool(1M) should have warned you that the redundancy level you were
attempting did not match that of
So I was hoping that this board would work: [...]GA-M57SLI-S4
I've been looking at that very same board for the very same purpose. It
has 2 gb nics, 6 sata ports, supports ECC memory and is passively
cooled. And it's very cheap compared to most systems that people
recommend for running
Eric Schrock wrote:
There's really no way to recover from this, since we don't have device
removal. However, I'm suprised that no warning was given. There are at
least two things that should have happened:
1. zpool(1M) should have warned you that the redundancy level you were
Wouldn't it be nice to have file revisions implemented in ZFS?
Mainframe FS (e.g. MVS) have this, and I think it should not be too hard to
implement this in ZFS.
Use Cases:
* Simple configuration management, below SCCS etc.
* Simple built-in FS trash bin
* Set # of revisions high for user homes
17 matches
Mail list logo
