Ian Collins wrote:
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I've just finished a small application to couple zfs_send and
zfs_receive through a socket to remove ssh from the equation and the
speed up is better than 2x. I have a small (140K) buffer on the sending
side to ensure the
On 05 December, 2008 - Brian Cameron sent me these 1,5K bytes:
I am the maintainer of GDM, and I am noticing that GDM has a problem when
running on a ZFS filesystem, as with Indiana.
When GDM (the GNOME Display Manager) starts the login GUI, it runs the
following commands on Solaris:
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out Solaris + ZFS
and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell them? That it is not fixed?
That they have reboot every week? Someone knows?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
However, I notice that when using ZFS on Indiana the above commands fail
with the following error:
File system doesn't support aclent_t style ACL's.
See acl(5) for more information on ACL styles support by Solaris.
What is the appropriate command to use with ZFS?
You can use
On 6-Dec-08, at 7:10 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
them? That it is not fixed? That they have reboot every week?
Someone knows?
That it's not recommended for
How do I get SMART data from my drives?
I'm running snv_101 on AMD64.
I have 6x SATA disks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Toby Thain wrote:
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
them? That it is not fixed? That they have reboot every week?
Someone knows?
That it's
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brian Hechinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Toby Thain wrote:
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
them? That it is
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:42:44PM -0600, Tim wrote:
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern
Sounds to me like they want to try out solaris + zfs, not zfs on fuse.
Ooops, misread what he said. Sorry about that.
I suppose my original comment still stands then. :)
-brian
--
Coding in C is like
Richard Elling wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I've just finished a small application to couple zfs_send and
zfs_receive through a socket to remove ssh from the equation and the
speed up is better than 2x. I have a small (140K)
Hi guys,
i've been following the [zfs-discuss] 'zfs recv' is very slow thread
and i believe i have the same issue; we get ~10MB/sec sending large
incrimental data sets using zfs send | ssh | zfs recv. I'd like to try
mbuffer.
We're running Solaris Express Developers Edition (SunOS murray 5.11
Does PAE help things at all on 32-bit ?
Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:42:44PM -0600, Tim wrote:
Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern
Sounds to me like they want to try out solaris + zfs, not zfs on fuse.
Ooops, misread what he said. Sorry about that.
I
Hello
i've been following the [zfs-discuss] 'zfs recv' is very slow thread
and i believe i have the same issue; we get ~10MB/sec sending large
incrimental data sets using zfs send | ssh | zfs recv. I'd like to try
mbuffer.
We're running Solaris Express Developers Edition (SunOS murray 5.11
If I remember right, the code needed for this has implications for a lot of
things:
- defrag
- adding disks to raidz zvols
- removing disks from vols
- restriping volumes (to give consistent performance after expansion)
In fact, I just found the question I asked a year or so back, which had a
They also mentioned this at some of the ZFS talks at LISA 2008.The general
argument is that, while plenty of hobbyists are clamoring for this, not enough
paying customers are asking to make it a high enough priority to get done.
If you think about it, the code is not only complicated but
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:36:35PM -0800, Joseph Mocker wrote:
Does PAE help things at all on 32-bit ?
No.
-brian
--
Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of
pop tarts and pancake mix. -- IRC
Thanks, but compared to what?
To Windows, are you sure we can say lot of additional?
To Linux, maybe, since I am not a Linux fan.
To leading NAS appliances, these are not competitive advantages.
opensolaris.org posted this, I would like an official answer!
The Open-spirit should be encouraged,
Ian, Tim, again, thank you very much in answering my question.
I am a bit disappointed that the whole discussion group does not have one
person to stand up and say yeah, OpenSolaris absolutely outperforms Linux
and Windows, because..
But I wish, one day, we can be arguing not on a basis of
Tim, thanks, yeah, I have highlighted Sun Storage SSD, see my blog, if you are
really interested.
http://ideasint.blogs.com/ideasinsights/2008/10/ssd-shines-new.html
note the Sun Storage comment to the blog and my reply.
Happy holidays!
z
- Original Message -
From: Tim
To:
Ethan Erchinger wrote:
Here is a sample set of messages at that time. It looks like timeouts
on the SSD for various requested blocks. Maybe I need to talk with
Intel about this issue.
Keeping everyone up-to-date, for those who care, I've RMAd the Intel
drive, and will retest when the
I don't understand your statement/questions. This wasn't a response to ZFS
versus every possible storage platform in the world. The original poster was
asking about comparing ZFS versus hardware RAID on specific machines as
mentioned in the title. AFAIK you don't get compression, snapshots
Yeah?
http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sas/value/SAS-31605/_details/Series3_FAQs.htm
Snapshot is a big deal?
Windows OS does that too.
Compression -- where is the performance data showing compression in
OpenSolaris has little overhead?
Clones -- tell me the benefit of
Is Jeff Cheeney still on this list? He had an open mind.
Jeff, if you can see this, tell me if I am wrong! Please!
Thanks!
z
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: William D. Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED];
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
Joseph Zhou wrote:
Yeah?
http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sas/value/SAS-31605/_details/Series3_FAQs.htm
Snapshot is a big deal?
Snapshot is a big deal, but you will find most hardware RAID
implementations
are somewhat limited, as the above adaptec only supports 4
Richard, thank you so very much!
This is the kind of answer I expected from Sun Storage.
I will do more studies before I speak again.
Happy holidays!!!
z
- Original Message -
From: Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joseph Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: William D. Hathaway [EMAIL
Richard Elling wrote:
Joseph Zhou wrote:
Yeah?
http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sas/value/SAS-31605/_details/Series3_FAQs.htm
Snapshot is a big deal?
Snapshot is a big deal, but you will find most hardware RAID
implementations
are somewhat limited,
Torrey, now this impressive as the old days with Sun Storage.
Ok, ZFS PiT is only a software solution.
The Windows VSS is not only a software solution, but also a 3rd party
integration standard from MS.
What's your comment on ZFS PiT is better than MS PiT, in light of openness
and 3rd-party
Ok, I am tired and going to bed.
Thanks, Real Sun Storage folks, this is the best discussion I have had in
months.
I am satisfied. ;-)
Goodnight, and long live the open spirit!!!
zStorageAnalyst
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Torrey McMahon [EMAIL
Compared to hw raid only snapshots ZFS is still, imho, easier to use.
If you start talking about VSS, aka shadow copy for Windows, you're now
at the fs level. I can see that VSS offers an API for 3rd parties to use
but, as I literally just started reading about it, I'm not an expert.
From a
Ok, Torrey, I like you, so one more comment before I go to bed --
Please go study the EMC NetWorker 7.5, and why EMC can claim leadership in
VSS support.
Then, if you still don't understand the importance of VSS, just ask me in an
open fashion, I will teach you.
The importance of storage in
30 matches
Mail list logo
