Dear Admins
I installed solaris 10-u6 based zfs on under two mirrored disks(rpool) in my
first sunfire v880 sparc machine.
my questions are:
1-can i remove one of my mirrored disks from this first machine and use it
as installed operating system in another machine and making this machine
There is an optional utility supplied by Sun (for all supported OSes)
to map the internal drives of the X4500/X4540 to their platform
specific device IDs, its called 'hd' and is on one of the support CD's
supplied with the systems (and can be downloaded if you've mislaid the
disk!).
On 25 January, 2009 - iman habibi sent me these 2,0K bytes:
Dear Admins
I installed solaris 10-u6 based zfs on under two mirrored disks(rpool) in my
first sunfire v880 sparc machine.
my questions are:
1-can i remove one of my mirrored disks from this first machine and use it
as installed
You can upgrade live. 'zfs upgrade' with no arguments shows you the
zfs version status of filesystems present without upgrading.
On Jan 24, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Ben Miller mil...@eecis.udel.edu wrote:
We haven't done 'zfs upgrade ...' any. I'll give that a try the
next time the system
Ahmed,
Thanks for your informative reply. I am involved with kristof
(original poster) in the setup, please allow me to reply below
Was the follow 'test' run during resynchronization mode or
replication
mode?
Neither, testing was done while in logging mode. This was chosen to
simply
# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
jira-app-zpool 272G 330K 272G 0% ONLINE -
The following command hangs forever. If I reboot the box , zpool list shows
online as I mentioned the output above.
# zpool destroy -f jira-app-zpool
How can get rid
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 25 January, 2009 - iman habibi sent me these 2,0K bytes:
Dear Admins
I installed solaris 10-u6 based zfs on under two mirrored disks(rpool) in my
first sunfire v880 sparc machine.
my questions are:
1-can i remove one of my mirrored disks from this first machine and
Recently, I've been working on a project which had agressive backup
requirements. I believe we solved the problem with parallelism. You
might consider doing the same. If you get time to do your own experiments,
please share your observations with the community.
Richard Elling wrote:
Recently, I've been working on a project which had agressive backup
requirements. I believe we solved the problem with parallelism. You
might consider doing the same. If you get time to do your own experiments,
please share your observations with the community.
