Hi,
I have just recovered from a ZFS crash. During the antagonizing time this took,
I was surprised to
learn how undocumented the tools and options for ZFS recovery we're. I managed
to recover thanks
to some great forum posts from Victor Latushkin, however without his posts I
would still be
On 6/1/2010 8:36 PM, zfsnoob4 wrote:
Hello,
I currently have a raid1 array setup on Windows 7 with a pair of 1.5TB drives.
I don't have enough space in any other drives to make a backup of all this data
and I really don't want to copy my ~1.1 TB of files over the network anyways.
What I want
On Jun 2, 2010, at 02:20, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
What the hell? I don't have a support contract for my home
machines... I don't feel like this is the right way to go for an
open source project...
Write a letter demanding a refund. Join the OpenSolaris Governing Board.
I'm not sure Oracle's
On 2/06/10 03:11 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Fix some typos.
#
In fact, there is no problem for MPxIO name in technology.
It only matters for storage admins to remember the name.
You are
On 2/06/10 03:11 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Fix some typos.
#
In fact, there is no problem for MPxIO name in technology.
It only matters for storage admins to remember the name.
You are
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Erik Trimble
Step 1:Break the mirror of A B inside Windows 7
Step 2:Purchase the new C hard drive, and install it in the case.
Step 3:Boot to OpenSolaris
Step 4:Make sure
James C. McPherson wrote:
On
2/06/10 03:11 PM, Fred Liu wrote:
Fix some typos.
#
In fact, there is no problem for MPxIO name in technology.
It only matters
On Wed, June 2, 2010 02:20, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
I have just recovered from a ZFS crash. During the antagonizing time
this took, I was surprised to learn how undocumented the tools and
options for ZFS recovery we're. I managed to recover thanks to some great
forum posts from Victor Latushkin,
This is the problem:
[r...@nasbackup backup-scripts]# zfs destroy
storagepool/nas-lyricp...@nasbackup-2010-05-14-15-56-30
cannot destroy 'storagepool/nas-lyricp...@nasbackup-2010-05-14-15-56-30':
dataset already exists
This is apparently a common problem. It's happened to me twice already,
# in localhost
# zfs list | grep data
localpool/data 447G 82.4G 392G /data
localpool/d...@now 54.4G - 419G -
# zfs get compressratio localpool/d...@now
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
localpool/d...@now compressratio 1.00x -
Is the pool mounted? I ran into this problem frequently, until I set mountpoint
to legacy. It may be that I had to destroy the filesystem afterwards, but since
I stopped mounting the backup target everything runs smoothly. Nevertheless I
agree it would be nice to find the root cause for this.
--
Hi Ned,
If you do incremental receives, this might be CR 6860996:
%temporary clones are not automatically destroyed on error
A temporary clone is created for an incremental receive and
in some cases, is not removed automatically.
Victor might be able to describe this better, but consider
the
Wow thank you very much for the clear instructions.
And Yes, I have another 120GB drive for the OS, separate from A, B and C. I
will repartition the drive and install Solaris. Then maybe at some point I'll
delete the entire drive and just install a single OS.
I have a question about step 6,
On 6/2/2010 9:03 AM, zfsnoob4 wrote:
Wow thank you very much for the clear instructions.
And Yes, I have another 120GB drive for the OS, separate from A, B and C. I
will repartition the drive and install Solaris. Then maybe at some point I'll
delete the entire drive and just install a single
Andreas,
We actually are not using one and hadn't thought about that at all. Do
you have a recommendation on a particular model? I see some that do SAS-SATA
and some that are just A/A SATA switches, is one better than the other? We
were looking at one based on a newer LSI part number
On Jun 2, 2010, at 12:03 PM, zfsnoob4 zfsnoob...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Wow thank you very much for the clear instructions.
And Yes, I have another 120GB drive for the OS, separate from A, B
and C. I will repartition the drive and install Solaris. Then maybe
at some point I'll delete the
Recently I talked to a co-worker who manages NetApp storages. We discussed size
changes for pools in zfs and aggregates in NetApp.
And some time before I had suggested to a my buddy zfs for his new home storage
server, but he turned it down since there is no expansion available for a pool.
On 6/2/10 3:54 PM -0700 Roman Naumenko wrote:
And some time before I had suggested to a my buddy zfs for his new home
storage server, but he turned it down since there is no expansion
available for a pool.
That's incorrect. zfs pools can be expanded at any time. AFAIK zfs has
always had this
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Roman Naumenko ro...@naumenko.ca wrote:
Recently I talked to a co-worker who manages NetApp storages. We discussed
size changes for pools in zfs and aggregates in NetApp.
And some time before I had suggested to a my buddy zfs for his new home
storage server,
Roman Naumenko wrote:
Recently I talked to a co-worker who manages NetApp storages. We discussed size
changes for pools in zfs and aggregates in NetApp.
And some time before I had suggested to a my buddy zfs for his new home storage server, but he turned it down since there is no expansion
On Jun 2, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Roman Naumenko ro...@naumenko.ca wrote:
Recently I talked to a co-worker who manages NetApp storages. We discussed
size changes for pools in zfs and aggregates in NetApp.
And some time before I had suggested to
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:54 PM, Roman Naumenko wrote:
Recently I talked to a co-worker who manages NetApp storages. We discussed
size changes for pools in zfs and aggregates in NetApp.
And some time before I had suggested to a my buddy zfs for his new home
storage server, but he turned it down
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Roman Naumenko ro...@naumenko.ca wrote:
And some time before I had suggested to a my buddy zfs for his new home
storage server, but he turned it down since there is no expansion available
for a pool.
There's no expansion for aggregates in OnTap, either. You
23 matches
Mail list logo
