Hi,
zfs_mknode() called from zfs_create() used to create device special file in
solaris kernel. I traverse the code and found how they stores the minor
number, which is in znode's attributes field.
*if* (obj_type == DMU_OT_ZNODE || (vap-va_type == VBLK ||
vap-va_type == VCHR)) {
Hi Edward,
Thank you for the feedback. All makes sense.
To clarify, yes, I snapshotted the VM within ESXi, not the filesystems within
the pool. Unfortunately, because of my misunderstanding of how ESXi
snapshotting works, I'm now left without the option of investigating whether
the replaced
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook
The claim was that there are more people contributing code from outside of
Oracle than inside to zfs. Your contributions to Illumos do absolutely
nothing
Guys, please let's just
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Chris Murray
Thank you for the feedback. All makes sense.
Sorry to hear about what's probably an unfortunate loss of nonredundant
disk...
One comment about etiquette though:
You changed
Edward Ned Harvey wrote
I don't know if anyone has real numbers, dollars contributed or number of
developer hours etc, but I think it's fair to say that oracle is probably
contributing more to the closed source ZFS right now, than the rest of the
world is contributing to the open source ZFS
From: Deano [mailto:de...@rattie.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:16 AM
So honestly do we want to innovate ZFS (I do) or do we just want to follow
Oracle?
Well, you can't follow Oracle. Unless you wait till they release something,
reverse engineer it, and attempt to
We do have a major commercial interest - Nexenta. It's been quiet but I do
look forward to seeing something come out of that stable this year? :-)
---
W. A. Khushil Dep - khushil@gmail.com - 07905374843
Visit my blog at http://www.khushil.com/
On 5 January 2011 14:34, Edward Ned
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 15:34, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Deano [mailto:de...@rattie.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:16 AM
So honestly do we want to innovate ZFS (I do) or do we just want to follow
Oracle?
Well, you
-Original Message-
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Michael Schuster
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:42 AM
To: Edward Ned Harvey
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] A few questions
On
From: Michael Schuster [mailto:michaelspriv...@gmail.com]
Well, you can't follow Oracle. Unless you wait till they release
something,
reverse engineer it, and attempt to reimplement it.
that's not my understanding - while we will have to wait, oracle is
supposed to release *some*
From: Khushil Dep [mailto:khushil@gmail.com]
We do have a major commercial interest - Nexenta. It's been quiet but I do
look forward to seeing something come out of that stable this year? :-)
I'll agree to call Nexenta a major commerical interest, in regards to
contribution to the open
I have a filer running Opensolaris (snv_111b) and I am presenting a
iSCSI share from a RAIDZ pool. I want to run ZFS on the share at the
client. Is it necessary to create a mirror or use ditto blocks at the
client to ensure ZFS can recover if it detects a failure at the client?
Thanks,
On 01/ 4/11 11:48 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com
mailto:garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On 01/ 4/11 09:15 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Garrett D'Amore
garr...@nexenta.com mailto:garr...@nexenta.com
Edward Ned Harvey wrote
From: Deano [mailto:de...@rattie.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:16 AM
So honestly do we want to innovate ZFS (I do) or do we just want to follow
Oracle?
Well, you can't follow Oracle. Unless you wait till they release
something,
reverse engineer
Hi Brandon,
I'm not the right person to evaluate your zstreamdump output, but I
can't reproduce this error on my b152 system, which as close as I
could get to b151a. See below.
Are the rpool and radar pool versions reasonably equivalent?
In your follow-up, I think you are saying that
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Cindy Swearingen
cindy.swearin...@oracle.com wrote:
In your follow-up, I think you are saying that rp...@copy is a recursive
snapshot and you are able to receive the individual rpool snapshots. You
just can't receive the recursive snapshot. Is this correct?
Okay. We are trying again to reproduce this on b151a.
In the meantime, you could rule out a problem with zfs send/recv on your
system if you could create another non-BE dataset with descendent
datasets, create a recursive snapshot, and retry the recursive send/recv
operation.
Thanks,
Cindy
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Cindy Swearingen
cindy.swearin...@oracle.com wrote:
In the meantime, you could rule out a problem with zfs send/recv on your
system if you could create another non-BE dataset with descendent
datasets, create a recursive snapshot, and retry the recursive
We installed b151a and couldn't reproduce a failed receive of a
recursive root pool snapshot and also tested on b152 and b155.
The original error message isn't very helpful, but your test below
points to a problem in your root pool environment.
You might review your zpool history -il rpool
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Cindy Swearingen
cindy.swearin...@oracle.com wrote:
You might review your zpool history -il rpool output for clues.
This isn't a critical problem, it's just a point of annoyance since it
seems like something that shouldn't happen. It's also just a test host
that's
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bruins
I have a filer running Opensolaris (snv_111b) and I am presenting a
iSCSI share from a RAIDZ pool. I want to run ZFS on the share at the
client. Is it necessary to create a mirror
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@nexenta.com]
I'll agree to call Nexenta a major commerical interest, in regards to
contribution to the open source ZFS tree, if they become an officially
supported OS on Dell, HP, and/or IBM hardware.
NexentaStor is officially supported on
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
with regards to ZFS and all the other projects relevant to solaris.)
I know in the case of SGE/OGE, it's officially closed source now. As of Dec
31st, sunsource is being decomissioned, and the announcement of officially
closing the SGE source and
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
You are asking a very intelligent question though. At first blush, it would
appear to be possible for the client to detect a checksum error, and then
due to lack of redundancy, be unable to correct it. Fortunately that's not
possible (see below)
24 matches
Mail list logo
