Hello all,
I have one more thought - or a question - about the current
strangeness of rpool import: is it supported, or does it work,
to have rpools on multipathed devices?
If yes (which I hope it is, but don't have a means to check)
what sort of a string is saved into the pool's labels as
On 19/10/12 04:50 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all,
I have one more thought - or a question - about the current
strangeness of rpool import: is it supported, or does it work,
to have rpools on multipathed devices?
If yes (which I hope it is, but don't have a means to check)
what sort of a
Thanks, more Qs below ;)
2012-10-19 11:16, James C. McPherson wrote:
if you run /usr/bin/strings over /etc/zfs/zpool.cache,
you'll see that not only is the device path stored, but
(more importantly) the devid.
As an excerpt from my adventurous notebook, which only has
an rpool on SAS, I see
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/18/2012 10:19 PM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Arne Jansen wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature.
What does FITS stand for?
Filesystem Incremental Transport Stream
(or Filesystem Independent Transport Stream)
Is this an attempt to
On 19.10.2012 10:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/18/2012 10:19 PM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Arne Jansen wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature.
What does FITS stand for?
Filesystem Incremental Transport Stream
(or Filesystem Independent
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
can be found here:
http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/sensille/fits-send/
It adds a command 'zfs fits-send'. The resulting streams can
currently only be received
On 19.10.2012 11:16, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
can be found here:
http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/sensille/fits-send/
It adds a command 'zfs fits-send'. The
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
Is this an attempt to create a competition for TAR?
Not really. We'd have preferred tar if it would have been powerful enough.
It's more an alternative to rsync for incremental updates. I really
like the send/receive feature and want to make it available
On 19.10.2012 12:17, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
Is this an attempt to create a competition for TAR?
Not really. We'd have preferred tar if it would have been powerful enough.
It's more an alternative to rsync for incremental updates. I really
like the
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ian Collins
You have to create pools/filesystems with the older versions used by the
destination machine.
Apparently zpool create -d -o version=28 you might want to do on the new
system...
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of James C. McPherson
As far as I'm aware, having an rpool on multipathed devices
is fine.
Even a year ago, a new system I bought from Oracle came with multipath devices
for all devices by
On 19/10/12 09:27 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of James C. McPherson
As far as I'm aware, having an rpool on multipathed devices is fine.
Even a year ago,
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 19.10.2012 12:17, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
Is this an attempt to create a competition for TAR?
Not really. We'd have preferred tar if it would have been powerful enough.
It's more an alternative to rsync for
On 19.10.2012 13:53, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 19.10.2012 12:17, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
Is this an attempt to create a competition for TAR?
Not really. We'd have preferred tar if it would have been powerful enough.
Hi,
I would like to give a short talk at my organisation in order
to sell them on zfs in general, and on zfs-all-in-one and
zfs as remote backup (zfs send).
Does anyone have a short set of presentation slides or maybe
a short video I could pillage for that purpose? Thanks.
-- Eugen
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 19.10.2012 11:16, Irek Szczesniak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
can be found here:
On Oct 19, 2012, at 1:04 AM, Michel Jansens michel.jans...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 10/18/12 21:09, Michel Jansens wrote:
Hi,
I've been using a Solaris 10 update 9 machine for some time to replicate
filesystems from different servers through zfs send|ssh zfs receive.
This was done to store
On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:37 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Hi,
I would like to give a short talk at my organisation in order
to sell them on zfs in general, and on zfs-all-in-one and
zfs as remote backup (zfs send).
Googling will find a few shorter presos. I have full-day presos on
On Oct 19, 2012, at 12:16 AM, James C. McPherson j...@opensolaris.org wrote:
On 19/10/12 04:50 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all,
I have one more thought - or a question - about the current
strangeness of rpool import: is it supported, or does it work,
to have rpools on multipathed devices?
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
can be found here:
http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/sensille/fits-send/
It adds a command 'zfs fits-send'. The resulting streams can
currently only be received
On 10/19/2012 09:58 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
mailto:sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
can be found here:
http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/sensille/fits-send/
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/19/2012 09:58 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
mailto:sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
can be
Yikes, I'm back at it again, and so frustrated.
For about 2-3 weeks now, I had the iscsi mirror configuration in production, as
previously described. Two disks on system 1 mirror against two disks on system
2, everything done via iscsi, so you could zpool export on machine 1, and then
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Richard Elling
At some point, people will bitterly regret some zpool upgrade with no way
back.
uhm... and how is that different than anything else in the software world?
No attempt at
Several times, I destroyed the pool and recreated it completely from
backup. zfs send and zfs receive both work fine. But strangely - when I
launch a VM, the IO grinds to a halt, and I'm forced to powercycle
(usually) the host.
A shot in the dark here, but perhaps one of the disks involved
hi there,
i need to connect some old raid subsystems to a opensolaris box via fibre
channel. can you recommend any FC HBA?
thanx
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Friday, October 19, 2012, Christof Haemmerle wrote:
hi there,
i need to connect some old raid subsystems to a opensolaris box via fibre
channel. can you recommend any FC HBA?
thanx
__
How old? If its 1gbit you'll need a 4gb or slower hba. Qlogic would be
Yep i Need. 4 Gig with multipathing if possible.
On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Friday, October 19, 2012, Christof Haemmerle wrote:
hi there,
i need to connect some old raid subsystems to a opensolaris box via fibre
channel. can you recommend any FC HBA?
28 matches
Mail list logo
