casper@oracle.com wrote:
It gets even better. Executables become part of the swap space via
mmap, so that if you have a lot of copies of the same process running in
memory, the executable bits don't waste any more space (well, unless you
use the sticky bit, although that might be
Alexander Block abloc...@googlemail.com wrote:
tar/pax was the initial format that was chosen for btrfs send/receive
as it looked like the best and most compatible way. In the middle of
development however I realized that we need more then storing whole
and incremental files/dirs in the
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/18/2012 10:19 PM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Arne Jansen wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature.
What does FITS stand for?
Filesystem Incremental Transport Stream
(or Filesystem Independent Transport Stream)
Is this an attempt to
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
Is this an attempt to create a competition for TAR?
Not really. We'd have preferred tar if it would have been powerful enough.
It's more an alternative to rsync for incremental updates. I really
like the send/receive feature and want to make it available
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 19.10.2012 12:17, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
Is this an attempt to create a competition for TAR?
Not really. We'd have preferred tar if it would have been powerful enough.
It's more an alternative to rsync
Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
In the end, the open-sourced ZFS community got no public replies
from Oracle regarding collaboration or lack thereof, and decided
to part ways and implement things independently from Oracle.
AFAIK main ZFS development converges in illumos-gate, contributed
Sa?o Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote:
To me it seems that the open-sourced ZFS community is not open, or could
you
point me to their mailing list archives?
Jörg
z...@lists.illumos.org
Well, why then has there been a discussion about a closed zfs mailing list?
Is this no
Sa?o Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2012 01:05 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Sa?o Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote:
To me it seems that the open-sourced ZFS community is not open, or
could you
point me to their mailing list archives?
Jörg
z
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
Well, why then has there been a discussion about a closed zfs mailing
Sa??o Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote:
write in case verify finds the blocks are different). With hashes, you
can leave verify off, since hashes are extremely unlikely (~10^-77) to
produce collisions.
This is how a lottery works. the chance is low but some people still win.
q~A
Sa?o Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/11/2012 10:47 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Sa??o Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com wrote:
write in case verify finds the blocks are different). With hashes, you
can leave verify off, since hashes are extremely unlikely (~10^-77) to
produce
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
CPU's are not getting much faster. But IO is definitely getting faster.
It's best to keep ahead of that curve.
It seems that per-socket CPU performance is doubling every year.
That
Eric Schrock eric.schr...@delphix.com wrote:
The decision to not support link(2) of directories was very deliberate - it
is an abomination that never should have been allowed in the first place.
My guess is that the behavior of unlink(2) on directories is a direct
side-effect of that (if link
Eric Schrock eric.schr...@delphix.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:19 AM, casper@oracle.com wrote:
In the very beginning, mkdir(1) was a set-uid application; it used
mknod to make a directory and then created a link from
newdir to newdir/.
and from
. to
Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
We know that large redundancy is highly recommended for
big HDDs, so in-place autoexpansion of the raidz1 pool
onto 3Tb disks is out of the question.
Before I started to use my thumper, I reconfigured it to use RAID-Z2.
This allows me to just replace disks
bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
There's something going on then. I have 7x 3TB disk at home, in
raidz3, so about 12TB usable. 2.5TB actually used. Scrubbing takes
about 2.5 hours. I had done the resilvering as well, and that did not
take 15 hours/drive. Copying 3TBs onto 2.5 SATA drives
? olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com wrote:
How can I test if a file on ZFS has holes, i.e. is a sparse file,
using the C api?
See star .
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/star/
or
http://hg.berlios.de/repos/schillix-on/file/e3829115a7a4/usr/src/cmd/star/hole.c
The interface was
andy thomas a...@time-domain.co.uk wrote:
What 'tar' program were you using? Make sure to also try using the
Solaris-provided tar rather than something like GNU tar.
I was using GNU tar actually as the original archive was created on a
Linux machine. I will try it again using Solaris
andy thomas a...@time-domain.co.uk wrote:
So it is GNU tar that is broken and not Solaris tar? I always thought it
was the other way round. Thanks for letting me know.
Before autoumn 2004, Sun tar had several problems with standard compliance but
then it has been tested against tartest(1)
andy thomas a...@time-domain.co.uk wrote:
I've tended to use GNU tar on Solaris as apparently there was a bug in the
Solaris version of tar from very log ago where it would not extract files
properly from tarfiles created on non-Solaris systems. Maybe this
long-standing bug has been fixed
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
On 7/25/2011 3:32 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
How long have you been using a SSD? Do you see any performance decrease? I
mean, ZFS does not support TRIM, so I wonder about long term effects...
Frankly, for the kind of use that ZFS puts on a SSD,
Peter Jeremy peter.jer...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
On 2011-May-25 03:49:43 +0800, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
... unless Oracle's zpool v30 is different than Nexenta's v30.
This would be unfortunate but no worse than the current situation
with UFS - Solaris, *BSD and HP Tru64 all
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
I am sure that the group exists ... I am a part of it, as are many of the
former Oracle ZFS engineers and a number of other ZFS contributors.
Whatever your proposal was, we have not seen it, but a solution has been
agreed upon widely already, and
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
You are welcome to your beliefs. There are many groups that do standards
that do not meet in public. In fact, I can't think of any standards bodies
that *do* hold open meetings.
You probybly don't know POSIX.
Jörg
--
Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:
There have been a number of RFC's effectively written by one
vendor in order to be able to claim open standards compliance, the
biggest corporate offender in this regard, but clearly not the only
one, is Microsoft. The next time I run across one of
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
rsync is indeed slower than star; so far as I can tell, this is due
almost exclusively to the fact that rsync needs to build an in-memory
table of all work being done *before* it starts to copy. After that, it
copies at about the same rate as
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
*ufsrestore works fine on ZFS filesystems (although I haven't tried it
with any POSIX ACLs on the original ufs filesystem, which would probably
simply get lost).
star -copy -no-fsync is typically 30% faster that ufsdump | ufsrestore.
Does it
Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Dan Shelton dan.shel...@oracle.com wrote:
Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons of
data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
rsync, with --whole-file --inplace (and other options),
Andrew Gabriel andrew.gabr...@oracle.com wrote:
Dan Shelton wrote:
Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons
of data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
I use 'ufsdump | ufsrestore'*. I would also suggest try setting
'sync=disabled' during the operation,
Dan Shelton dan.shel...@oracle.com wrote:
Is anyone aware of any freeware program that can speed up copying tons
of data (2 TB) from UFS to ZFS on same server?
Try star -copy
Note that due to the problems on ZFS to deal with stable states, I recommend to
use -no-fsync and it may of
jeff.liu jeff@oracle.com wrote:
Hello List,
I am trying to fetch the data/hole info of a sparse file through the
lseek(SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA)
stuff, the result of fpathconf(..., _PC_MIN_HOLE_SIZE) is ok, so I think this
interface is supported
on my testing ZFS, but SEEK_HOLE always
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
But they are involved in the discussions around which features should be
there, and help to prioritise those features.
I guess my fear is the external ZFS developers have adopted the Oracle
rather than the OpenSolaris development model. We all know
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
The feeling I get is that while there is plenty of userland work being
done, there is next to nothing on ZFS development outside of the Oracle
camp.
There is an active ZFS working group where many people contributing code to
the core
ZFS
David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Mar 20, 2011, at 09:26, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The long term acceptance for ZFS depends on how Oracle will behave past the
announced Solaris 11 is released. If they don't Opensource the related ZFS,
they will harm the future of ZFS
Michael DeMan sola...@deman.com wrote:
Moving forward...
If Oracle continues to release critical ZFS feature sets under CDDL to the
community, then:
A) They are no longer pre-releasing those features to OpenSolaris
B) FreeBSD gets them at the same time.
If Oracle does not continue to
Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
Probably, we need place a tag before zfs -- Opensource-ZFS or Oracle-ZFS
after Solaris11 release.
If it is true, these two ZFSes will definitely evolve into different
directions.
BTW, Did Oracle unveil the actual release date? We are also at the cross
Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
Sorry. I put post in cc.
I use NFSv3(linux 2.4 kernel) coreutils-8.9.
On Linux, NFSv3 does not support ACLs at all.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
Cindy Swearingen cindy.swearin...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Robert,
We integrated some fixes that allowed you to replace disks of equivalent
sizes, but 40 MB is probably beyond that window.
In former times, similar problems applied to partitioned disks with UFS
and we at that time did check the
Andrew Gabriel andrew.gabr...@oracle.com wrote:
If you go back to the late 1970's before tracks had embedded servo data,
on multi-platter disks you had one surface which contained the head
positioning servo data, and the drive relied on accurate vertical
alignment between heads/surfaces to
Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok, I read a bit more on TRIM. It seems that without TRIM, there will be more
unnecessary reads and writes on the SSD, the result being that writes can
take long time.
A) So, how big of a problem is it? Sun has for long sold SSDs (for
Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
What is the status of ZFS support for TRIM?
I believe it's been supported for a while now.
Torrey McMahon tmcmah...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 1/30/2011 5:26 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Richard Ellingrichard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
ufsdump is the problem, not ufsrestore. If you ufsdump an active
file system, there is no guarantee you can ufsrestore it. The only way
to guarantee
Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:41:52PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
What is the status of ZFS support
Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Tim Cook tim at cook.ms writes:
You are not a court of law, and that statement has not been tested. It is
your opinion and nothing more. I'd appreciate if every time you repeated that
statement, you'd preface it with in my opinion so you don't have
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
I've read Joerg's paper, and I've read several of the patents in
question, and nowhere around is there any real code. A bit of
Netapp filed patents (without code) in 1993, I of course have working code for
SuinOS-4.9 from 1991. Se below for more
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
I've read Joerg's paper, and I've read several of the patents in
question, and nowhere around is there any real code. A bit of
Netapp filed patents (without code) in 1993, I
Darren J Moffat darren.mof...@oracle.com wrote:
On 22/12/2010 20:27, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
That said, some operations -- and cryptographic ones in particular --
may use floating point registers and operations because for some
architectures (sun4u rings a bell) this can make certain
Phil Harman phil.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes to the resilvering implementation don't necessarily require
changes to the on disk format (although they could). Of course, there
might be an issue moving a pool mid-resilver from one implementation to
another.
We seem to come to a similar
Frank Cusack frank+lists/z...@linetwo.net wrote:
On 12/16/10 11:32 AM +0100 Joerg Schilling wrote:
Note that while there existist
numerous papers from lawyers that consistently explain which parts of
the GPLv2 are violating US law and thus are void,
Can you elaborate?
See: http
Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
js == Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
delivered the following alternate reality of idealogical
partisan hackery:
js GPLv3 does not give you anything you don't have from CDDL
js also.
I think this is wrong
Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
* when do the CDDL patent protections apply? to deals between Oracle
and Netapp? or is it only protection against Oracle patents? I
think the latter, but then, which Oracle patents? Suppose:
The CDDL gives patent grants to all patents that relate
Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
bf == Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us writes:
bf Perhaps it is better for Linux if it is GPLv2, but probably
bf not if it is GPLv3.
That's my understanding: GPLv3 is the one you would need to preserve
software freedom under deals
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
These reasons don't make CDDL incompatible with GPL. GPL is
compatible with any license which is at least as permissive as itself.
GPLv2 only requires that the recipient be able to receive all of the
source code under terms which allow
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
The last update I see to the ZFS public tree is 29 Oct 2010. Which, I
*think*, is about the time that the fork for the Solaris 11 Express
snapshot was taken.
Do you really see such an update?
The last time I tried, the source was frozen on
Linder, Doug doug.lin...@merchantlink.com wrote:
Why do you want them to GPL ZFS? In what way would that save you
annoyance?
I actually think Doug was trying to say he wished Oracle would open the
development and make the source code open-sourced, not necessarily
GPL'd.
Yes. I
C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org wrote:
lalala..
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletubbies
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
Problem is... Oracle is now the only company in the world who's immune to
netapp lawsuit over ZFS. Even if IBM and Dell and HP wanted to band together
and fund the open-source development of ZFS and openindiana...
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
I don't believe that there is a significant risk as the NetApp patents are
invalid because of prior art.
You are not a court of law, and that statement has not been tested. It is
your opinion and nothing more. I'd appreciate if every time you repeated
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Hi all
(crossposting to zfs-discuss)
This error also seems to occur on osol 134. Any idea what this might be?
ioctl(4, USCSICMD, 0x08046910) = 0
ioctl(4, USCSICMD, 0x08046900) = 0
ioctl(4, USCSICMD, 0x08046570) = 0
ioctl(4, USCSICMD,
Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote:
Typically on most filesystems, the inode number of the root
directory of the filesystem is 2, 0 being unused and 1 historically
once invisible and used for bad blocks (no longer done, but kept
reserved so as not to invalidate assumptions implicit
Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
If a shell script may be dependent on GNU 'cat', does that make the shell
script a derived work? Note that GNU 'cat' could be replaced with some
other 'cat' since 'cat' has a well defined interface. A very similar
situation exists for loadable
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
A quick test with a C++ application I'm working with which does a lot of
string and container manipulation shows it
runs about 10% slower in 64 bit mode on AMD64 and about the same in 32
or 64 bit on a core i7. Built with -fast.
This may be a result of
Edward Ned Harvey sh...@nedharvey.com wrote:
The reasons for ZFS not in Linux must be more than just the license issue.
If Linux has ZFS, then it would be possible to do
- I/O performance analysis based on the same FS implementation
- stability analysis for data, crashes, ...
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
There is no common C++ ABI. So you get into compatibility concerns
between code built with different compilers (like Studio vs. g++).
Fail.
The interesting thing is: Sun Studio on Linux is able to interoperate with g++
Jörg
--
Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
gd == Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com writes:
Joerg is correct that CDDL code can legally live right
alongside the GPLv2 kernel code and run in the same program.
gd My understanding is that no, this is not possible.
GPLv2 and CDDL
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
All of this is entirely legal conjecture, by people who aren't lawyers,
for issues that have not been tested by court and are clearly subject to
interpretation. Since it no longer is relevant to the topic of the
list, can we please either take the
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
If you have an orthogonal architecture like sparc, a typical 64 bit program
is
indeed a bit slower than the same program in 32 bit.
On Amd64, you have twice as many registers in 64 bit mode and this is the
reason for a typical performance gain of
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:04 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Ross Walker wrote:
And there lies the problem, you need the agreement of all copyright
holders in a GPL project to change it's licensing terms and some
just
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 08/18/10 12:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ian Collinsi...@ianshome.com wrote:
If you have an orthogonal architecture like sparc, a typical 64 bit
program is
indeed a bit slower than the same program in 32 bit.
On Amd64, you have twice
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
(The only way I could see this changing would be if there was a sudden
license change which would permit either ZFS to overtake btrfs in the
Linux kernel, or permit btrfs to overtake zfs in the Solaris kernel. I
There is only a need for a mind
Haudy Kazemi kaze0...@umn.edu wrote:
EON (Embedded ON) NAS (Network Attached Storage)
EON ver 0.60.0 is based on build 130
EON ver 0.59.9 is based on build 129
EON ver 0.59.5 is based on build 125
EON ver 0.59.4 is based on build 124
EON ver 0.59.3 is based on build 122
EON ver 0.59.2 is
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
On Sun, August 15, 2010 20:44, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Irrespective of the above, there is nothing requiring Oracle to release
any future btrfs or ZFS improvements (or even bugfixes). They can't
retrospectively change the license on already released
Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote:
I absolutely guarantee Oracle can and likely already has
dual-licensed BTRFS.
Well, Oracle obviously would want btrfs to stay as part of the Linux
kernel rather than die a death of anonymity outside of it...
As such, they'll need to continue to
C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org wrote:
I absolutely guarantee Oracle can and likely already has dual-licensed
BTRFS.
No.. talk to Chris Mason.. it depends on the linux kernel too much
already to be available under anything, but GPLv2
If he really believes this, then he seems to be
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
As such, they'll need to continue to comply with GPLv2 requirements.
No, there is definitely no need for Oracle to comply with the GPL as they
own the code.
Ray's point is, how long would BTRFS remain in the Linux kernel in that case?
Such a
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
The real question is, WHY would they do it? What would be the business
motivation here? Chris Mason would most likely leave Oracle, Red Hat
would hire him and fork the last GPL'd version of btrfs and Oracle
would have relegated itself to a non-player in the
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
insults. Oracle can pull the plug at any time they choose. *ONE* developer
from Redhat does not change the fact that Oracle owns the rights to the
majority of the code, and can relicense it, or discontinue code updates, as
they see fit.
It would be most
Andrej Podzimek and...@podzimek.org wrote:
P. S. As far as Phoronix is concerned... Well, I remember how they once used
a malfunctioning and crippled Reiser4 implementation (hacked by the people
around the ZEN patchset so that it caused data corruption (!) and kernel
crashes) and compared
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
I repeated this test and it turned out, that Linux did not even start to
write
to the disk when gtar finished.
As a test of ext? performance, that does seem to be lacking something!
I guess it's a consequence of the low sound levels of modern disk
Mike M the.li...@mgm51.com wrote:
Think: strategic business advantage.
Oracle are not stupid, they recognize a jewel when they see one.
Too bad that they decided to throw it into acid.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
valrh...@gmail.com valrh...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone looked into the new LTFS on LTO-5 for tape backups? Any idea how
this would work with ZFS? I'm presuming ZFS send / receive are not going to
work. But it seems rather appealing to have the metadata properly with the
data, and being
Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
IMHO it's important we don't get stuck running Nexenta in the same
spot we're now stuck with OpenSolaris: with a bunch of CDDL-protected
source that few people know how to use
Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
using FreeBSD 9 w/ ZFSv15 using default settings, nothing in loader.conf
or nothing in sysctl.conf and a GENERIC kernel
12GB of memory seems to be all ZFS wanted to use, I have tried
machines with 32GB
but zfs never wants to use more unless you play
BM bogdan.maryn...@gmail.com wrote:
You seem to be totally convinced in the future of Linux and BTRFS,
so I recommend you leave this community and join that one.
Neither I convinced or not. All I say is:
1. There is no new builds.
Do you like to tell us Linux is dead because you cannot
Edward Ned Harvey solar...@nedharvey.com wrote:
CDDL contains an explicit disclaimer of warranty, which means, if Apple were
to download CDDL ZFS source code and compile and distribute it themselves,
they would be fully liable for any lawsuit waged against them. But CDDL
also allows for Sun
Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
This situation is why I'm coming to believe that there is almost no case
for software patents. (I still think there may be a few exceptions --
the RSA patent being a good example where there was significant enough
innovation to possibly justify a
Tristram Scott tristram.sc...@quantmodels.co.uk wrote:
I see a number of points to consider when choosing amongst the various
suggestions for backing up zfs file systems. In no particular order, I have
these:
Let me fill this out for star ;-)
1. Does it work in place, or need an
artiepen ceco...@uga.edu wrote:
40MB/sec is the best that it gets. Really, the average is 5. I see 4, 5, 2,
and 6 almost 10x as many times as I see 40MB/sec. It really only bumps up to
40 very rarely.
I get Read/write speeds of aprox. 630 MB/s into ZFS on
a SunFire X4540.
It seems that you
Peter Jeremy peter.jer...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
On 2010-Jun-11 17:41:38 +0800, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
PP.S.: Did you know that FreeBSD _includes_ the GPLd Reiserfs in the FreeBSD
kernel since a while and that nobody did complain about this, see e.g
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Sorry but your reply is completely misleading as the people who claim that
there is a legal problem with having ZFS in the Linux kernel would of course
also claim that Reiserfs cannot
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
I am really sad to hear you saying these things since if it was all
actually true, then Linux, *BSD, and Solaris distributions could not
legally exist. Thankfully, only part of the above is true.
If linking of independent works would
Alex Blewitt alex.blew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 11, 2010, at 10:43, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jason King ja...@ansipunx.net wrote:
Well technically they could start with the GRUB zfs code, which is
GPL
licensed, but I don't think that's the case.
As explained in depth
Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
I don't want to restart something here on this list - I just wanted to
make sure that the original developers understood that there are very
possibly issues using CDDL code in conjunction with GPL'd code. If they
are indeed using OpenSolaris ZFS
Alex Blewitt alex.blew...@gmail.com wrote:
The GPL doesn't prevent you doing things. However, it does withdraw
the agreement that you are permitted to copy someone else's work if
you do those things. So whilst one can compile and link code together,
you may not have the rights to use
Hillel Lubman shtetl...@gmail.com wrote:
A very interesting video from DebConf, which addresses CDDL and GPL
incompatibility issues, and some original reasoning behind CDDL usage:
Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
Run |cfgadm -cconfigure |on the unconfigured Ids|, see the man page for
the gory details.|
IF the BIOS is OK ;-)
I have a problem with a DELL PC: If I disable the other SATA ports, Solaris
is unable to detect new drives (linux does). If I enable other
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRC, POSIX does not permit hard links to directories. Moving or renaming
the directory structure gets disconnected from the original because these
are relative relationships. Clearly, NetApp achieves this in some manner
which is not constrained
? olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no way in the SUS standard to determinate if a file system is
case insensitive, i.e. with pathconf?
SUS requires a case sensitive filesystem.
There is no need to request this from a POSIX view
Jörg
--
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, James Van Artsdalen wrote:
OpenSolaris needs support for the TRIM command for SSDs. This
command is issued to an SSD to indicate that a block is no longer in
use and the SSD may erase it in preparation for future
Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
Yes of course. Properly built SSDs include considerable extra space
to support wear leveling, and this same space may be used to store
erased blocks. A block which is overwritten can simply be written
to a block allocated from the extra
1 - 100 of 405 matches
Mail list logo
