to me!
Hopefully this nasty bug is fixed soon :(
Thanks,
Josh Simon
On 12/12/2012 1:21 PM, Jamie Krier wrote:
I've hit this bug on four of my Solaris 11 servers. Looking for anyone
else who has seen it, as well as comments/speculation on cause.
This bug is pretty bad. If you are lucky you can
it was kind of odd that Oracle would direct us to a blog,
but the post is very thorough.
Thanks,
Josh Simon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
?
This seems to be a very common drive people deploy in ZFS pools.
Thanks,
Josh Simon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
, you'll really wish you had spent the
extra cash up front. Really.
and
http://gdamore.blogspot.com/2010/12/update-on-sata-expanders.html
This sounds like it will affect a lot of people since so many are using
SATA SSD for their log devices connected to SAS expanders.
Thanks,
Josh Simon
and not true anymore.
end quote from thread
Josh Simon
On 06/29/2010 08:10 AM, Preston Connors wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 08:58 +0200, Bruno Sousa wrote:
Hmm...that easy? ;)
Thanks for the tip, i will see if that works out.
Bruno
Be aware of the Important Note in
http://wikis.sun.com
Have you tried creating tank/bkp without the -s option. I believe I read
somewhere that the -s option can lead to poor performance on larger
volumes (which doesn't make sense to me). Also are you using a zil/log
device?
Josh Simon
On 06/29/2010 09:33 AM, Effrem Norwood wrote:
Hi All,
I
,
# CME XIRTEMMYS,NONE;
#
#END: FAILOVER_MODULE_BLOCK (DO NOT MOVE OR DELETE).
How can I get this working as expected (2.2 GB/s round-robin
load-balanced across both paths)?
Thanks in advance for your assistance!
Josh Simon
___
zfs-discuss
