[zfs-discuss] Snapshot access from non-global zones

Hello I'm curious what is the best (if any) way to access ZFS snapshots from the non-global zones? I have a common ZFS file system (on Solaris Express b116 for ex.) in a global zone, mounted as lofs to several non-global zones. In each zone I can access all files with no problem, but I'm unable

Re: [zfs-discuss] j4200 drive carriers

Hello 1) Dual IO module option 2) Multipath support 3) Zone support [multi host connecting to same JBOD or same set of JBOD's connected in series. ] This sounds interesting - where I can read more about connecting two hosts to same J4200 etc? Thanks Mike

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs send / zfs receive hanging

Hi It would be also nice to be able to specify the zpool version during pool creation. E.g. If I have a newer machine and I want to move data to an older one, I should be able to specify the pool version, otherwise it's a one-way street. zpool create -o version=xx ... Mike

Re: [zfs-discuss] 'zfs recv' is very slow

Hello Yah, the incrementals are from a 30TB volume, with about 1TB used. Watching iostat on each side during the incremental sends, the sender side is hardly doing anything, maybe 50iops read, and that could be from other machines accessing it, really light load. The receiving side however,

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs list improvements?

Hello This seems like a reasonable proposal to enhance zfs list. But it would also be good to add as few new options to zfs list as possible. So it probably makes sense to add at most one of these new options. Or perhaps add an optional depth argument to the -r option instead? As you

Re: [zfs-discuss] How to compile mbuffer

Hello i've been following the [zfs-discuss] 'zfs recv' is very slow thread and i believe i have the same issue; we get ~10MB/sec sending large incrimental data sets using zfs send | ssh | zfs recv. I'd like to try mbuffer. We're running Solaris Express Developers Edition (SunOS murray 5.11

[zfs-discuss] ZFS snapshot list

Hello Is there any way to list all snapshots of particular file system without listing the snapshots of its children file systems? Thanks, Mike ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS snapshot list

Hi [Default] On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:37:50 +0200, Mike Futerko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Is there any way to list all snapshots of particular file system without listing the snapshots of its children file systems? fsnm=tank/fs;zfs list -rt snapshot ${fsnm}|grep ${fsnm}@ or even

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Fit-PC Slim?

Hi Not merely a little pokey it was unacceptably slow and the casing got very warm. I am guessing it was pushing CPU right to 100% all the time. Took hours to load and when booting took minutes. Also didn't see an easy way to disable graphical login so on boot every time it would go to

Re: [zfs-discuss] Strange result when syncing between SPARC and x86

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -la /data/zones/testfs/root/etc/services lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 13 14:35 /data/zones/testfs/root/etc/services - ./inet/services [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -la /data/zones/testfs/root/etc/services lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 13 14:35

Re: [zfs-discuss] Strange result when syncing between SPARC and x86

Hi Just checked with snv_99 on x86 (VMware install) - same result :( Regards Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Today I've suddenly noticed that symlinks (at least) are corrupted when sync ZFS from SPARC to x86 (zfs send | ssh | zfs recv). Example is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -la

[zfs-discuss] Strange result when syncing between SPARC and x86

Hello Today I've suddenly noticed that symlinks (at least) are corrupted when sync ZFS from SPARC to x86 (zfs send | ssh | zfs recv). Example is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -la /data/zones/testfs/root/etc/services lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 13 14:35

[zfs-discuss] Kernel panic on ZFS snapshot destroy

Hello all I have weird problem with a snapshot... when I try to delete it kernel panics. However I can successfully create and then delete other snapshots on same file system. The OS version I noticed it happens was snv_81 so I've upgraded to snv_94 (LU) but it doesn't help. I've attached