Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS acl inherit problem

2011-07-18 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, Ok, I've done this with success on NexentaStor 3.0.5, using zpool version 26. I know the aclmode was removed at some point after this, but then put back in later. (Search the list for details.) I've got the acl's below set on the top level directory. I put my users requirering access in

Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS acl inherit problem

2011-07-16 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, Set the zfs properties aclmode *and* aclinherit properties to passthrough for the dataset you're writing to. This works for me having both Windows clients using cifs, and Linux clients using nfs. Regards, Siggi On 06/01/2011 08:51 AM, lance wilson wrote: The problem is that nfs

Re: [zfs-discuss] Sun T3-2 and ZFS on JBODS

2011-03-03 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, This turned out to be a scheduler issue. The system was still running the default TS scheduler. By switching to the FSS scheduler the performance was back to what it was before the system was reinstalled. When using the TS scheduler the writes would not evenly spread across the drives. We

[zfs-discuss] Sun T3-2 and ZFS on JBODS

2011-03-02 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, We have purchased a new Sun (Oracle) T3-2 machine and 5 shelves of 12 x 2TB SAS2 JBOD disks for our new backup server. Each shelf is connected via a single SAS cable to a seperate SAS controller. When the system arrived it had Solaris 10 U9 preinstalled. We tested ZFS performance and got

[zfs-discuss] [Fwd: Sun T3-2 and ZFS on JBODS]

2011-03-02 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
I forgot to mention, the server was jumpstarted with Solaris 10 U9, and the latest patch cluster was downloaded and applied. Original Message Subject: [zfs-discuss] Sun T3-2 and ZFS on JBODS From:Sigbjorn

Re: [zfs-discuss] Ideas for ghetto file server data reliability?

2010-11-15 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Do you need registered ECC, or will non-reg ECC do to get around this issue you described? On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 16:48 +0700, VO wrote: Hello List, I recently got bitten by a panic on `zpool import` problem (same CR 6915314), while testing a ZFS file server. Seems the pool is pretty much

Re: [zfs-discuss] HP ProLiant N36L

2010-11-11 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Did you try NexentaCore? You gain full control over command line, like in OpenSolaris. However it seems faster and got more bugs fixed than OpenSolaris b134. I have already had OpenSolaris b134 crash one of my disk systems, I would never install it again... Besides, I would never get full 1

Re: [zfs-discuss] Networker Dedup @ ZFS

2010-08-25 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, What sort of compression ratio do you get? Sigbjorn On Wed, August 18, 2010 12:59, Hans Foertsch wrote: Hello, we use ZFS on Solaris 10u8 as a backup to disk solution with EMC Networker. We use the standard recordsize 128k and zfs compression. Dedup we can't use, because of

Re: [zfs-discuss] Networker Dedup @ ZFS

2010-08-25 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Wow, not bad! What is your CPU penalty for enabling compression? Sigbjorn On Wed, August 18, 2010 14:11, Paul Kraus wrote: On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.com wrote: I tried this with NetBackup, and decided against it pretty rapidly. Basically, we

[zfs-discuss] Networker Dedup @ ZFS

2010-08-18 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, We are considering using a ZFS based storage as a staging disk for Networker. We're aiming at providing enough storage to be able to keep 3 months worth of backups on disk, before it's moved to tape. To provide storage for 3 months of backups, we want to utilize the dedup functionality in

[zfs-discuss] NFS performance?

2010-07-23 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
Hi, I've been searching around on the Internet to fine some help with this, but have been unsuccessfull so far. I have some performance issues with my file server. I have an OpenSolaris server with a Pentium D 3GHz CPU, 4GB of memory, and a RAIDZ1 over 4 x Seagate (ST31500341AS) 1,5TB SATA

Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS performance?

2010-07-23 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
it to nonvolatile storage in case the server restarts etc). The simplest safe solution, although not cheap, is to add an SSD log device to the pool. On 23 Jul 2010, at 08:11, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: Hi, I've been searching around on the Internet to fine some help

Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS performance?

2010-07-23 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
On Fri, July 23, 2010 10:42, tomwaters wrote: I agree, I get apalling NFS speeds compared to CIFS/Samba..ie. CIFS/Samba of 95-105MB and NFS of 5-20MB. Not the thread hijack, but I assume a SSD ZIL will similarly improve an iSCSI target...as I am getting 2-5MB on that too. -- This

Re: [zfs-discuss] NFS performance?

2010-07-23 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
On Fri, July 23, 2010 11:21, Thomas Burgess wrote: On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Sigbjorn Lie sigbj...@nixtra.com wrote: I see I have already received several replies, thanks to all! I would not like to risk losing any data, so I believe a ZIL device would be the way for me. I see

Re: [zfs-discuss] Legality and the future of zfs...

2010-07-15 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
On Thu, July 15, 2010 09:38, Frank Cusack wrote: On 7/15/10 9:49 AM +0900 BM wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: ZFS is great. It's pretty much the only reason we're running Solaris. Well, if this is the the only reason, then run FreeBSD instead. I

[zfs-discuss] ZFS recovery tools

2010-06-02 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
project... A penny for anyone elses thoughts or facts about why it's like this...:) regards, Sigbjorn Lie 's/windows/unix/g' - Ubuntu - an African word, meaning Slackware is too hard for me ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org