the intelligence built in to stagger drive
spin-up. I wouldn't spend money on one that didn't. There's really no
need to stagger the JBOD power-up at the PDU.
As for the head, yes it should have a delayed power on which you can
typically set in the BIOS.
--Tim
that production ready.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
they currently are). I'd avoid
deduplication unless you absolutely need it... it's still a bit of a
kludge. Stick to compression and your world will be a much happier place.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
looking for.
None of them will provide SMB3 (at all) or AFP (without a third party
package).
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:
Tim Cook writes:
I need something that will allow me to share files over SMB (3 if
possible), NFS, AFP (for Time Machine) and iSCSI. Ideally, i would
like something i can manage easily and something that works
,
the snapshot will become an issue very quickly.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
for existing datasets, and it can absolutely
help prevent a fat finger or a lack of caffeine ruining someone's day.
If the feature is already there somewhere, I'm sure someone will chime in.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
change your mind later you have to go back through and give everyone you
want to have that feature access to it. That seems like a complete PITA to
me.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
That depends entirely on how full the pool is when the new vdev is added,
and how frequently the older data changes, snapshots, etc.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Markus Grundmann mar...@freebsduser.eu
wrote
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Why would I spend all that time and
energy participating in ANOTHER list controlled by Oracle, when
decision, yes. Not to poke fun, but did you
really expect an official response after YEARS of nothing from Oracle?
This is the same company that refused to release any Java patches until
the DHS issued a national warning suggesting that everyone uninstall Java.
--Tim
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
That would be the logical decision, yes. Not to poke fun, but did you
really
expect an official
corporate
policy allow you to.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
showstoppers I'm sure I'd have heard
loud complaints by now :)
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
suggestions to improve it? What other variables can be interesting?
An example of the current state of the program is here:
http://devilator.frobula.com
Thanks,
Borja.
The zpool iostat output has all sorts of statistics I think would be
useful/interesting to record over time.
--Tim
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 20, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Edward Harvey imaginat...@nedharvey.com
wrote:
But, by talking about it, we're just smoking pipe dreams. Cuz we all
know zfs is developmentally challenged now. But one can dream...
on IT firmware.
The Dell method is more involved but it's the only why that I've
managed to got a Dell H200 cross flashed.
Seems like the M1015 has spiked in price again on eBay (US) whilst
the H200 is still under $100.
--
Tim Fletcher
t...@night-shade.org.uk
.
The HP H221 is the newer SAS2008 based HBA that replaces the SC08Ge,
it's definitely a pure HBA as I have one but I don't have any external
disk shelves to test with currently.
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/14222_div/14222_div.html
--
Tim Fletcher
t...@night-shade.org.uk
to get LSI firmware and reflash
Dell H310.
I've successfully crossflashed Dell H200 cards with this method
http://forums.servethehome.com/showthread.php?467-DELL-H200-Flash-to-IT-firmware-Procedure-for-DELL-servers
--
Tim Fletcher t...@night-shade.org.uk
On 07/01/13 21:16, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 01/07/2013 09:32 PM, Tim Fletcher wrote:
On 07/01/13 14:01, Andrzej Sochon wrote:
Hello *Sašo*!
I found you here:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2012-May/051546.html
“How about reflashing LSI firmware to the card? I read on Dell's
you just use a SAN that supports full drive encryption? There
should be basically 0 performance overhead.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Trond Michelsen tron...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen tron...@gmail.com
wrote:
How can I
bp_rewrite and the guys who have the
skills to do so saying their enterprise customers have other needs*
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
take downtime.
Likely impossible for OP with 42 large drives.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
choice at 4Gb+
Here's a list of all the old Sun FC HBAs (which can help you sort out
which are for x64 systems, and which were for SPARC systems):
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/documentation/oracle-storage-networking-190061.html
As Tim said, these should all have built-in drivers
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/20/2012 01:10 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
mailto:sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/19/2012 09:58 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5
The built in drivers support Mpha so you're good to go.
On Friday, October 19, 2012, Christof Haemmerle wrote:
Yep i Need. 4 Gig with multipathing if possible.
On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 't...@cook.ms'); wrote:
On Friday, October 19
come up with something. Are you planning on this being
solely for ZFS, or a larger architecture for replication both directions in
the future?
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
On Friday, October 19, 2012, Christof Haemmerle wrote:
hi there,
i need to connect some old raid subsystems to a opensolaris box via fibre
channel. can you recommend any FC HBA?
thanx
__
How old? If its 1gbit you'll need a 4gb or slower hba. Qlogic would be
On 10/01/2012 09:09 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
Just perform a bunch of writes, time it. Then set sync=disabled,
perform the same set of writes, time it. Then enable sync, add a ZIL
device, time it. The third option will be somewhere in between the
first
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:45 PM
I would suggest if you're doing a crossover between
infiniband rather than ethernet. You can eBay a 40Gb IB card for under
$300. Quite frankly the performance issues should become almost a
non-factor at that point.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
data
protection it's a point in time copy.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
no universally false.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
+1-760-896-4422
I would think a flag to allow you to automatically continue with a
disclaimer might be warranted (default behavior obviously requiring human
input).
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
. The PETABYTES of data Quantum and DataDomain have out there
are proof positive that complex hashes get the job done without verify,
even if you don't want to acknowledge the math behind it.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
on Sunday's or something so
that you at least make it through the whole dataset at least once a month.
There's no reason NOT to scrub that I can think of other than the overhead
- which shouldn't matter if you're doing it during off hours.
--Tim
___
zfs
Oracle never promised anything. A leaked internal memo does not signify an
official company policy or statement.
On Apr 18, 2012 11:13 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Cindy Swearingen
cindy.swearin...@oracle.com wrote:
Hmmm, how come they have
. Deaf ears :/
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
You will however have an issue replacing them if one should fail. You
need
to have the same block count to replace a device, which is why I asked
/illumos-User-Group/events/41665962/
As always, feel free to tell me why my rant is completely off base ;)
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
exactly is the deal with the zfs discuss mailing
list? There's all of 3 posts that show up for all of 2011. Am I missing
something, or is there just that little traction currently?
http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182191/sort/time_rev/
--Tim
___
zfs
clear, very quickly that something was wrong.
http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2008/03/01/configuring-zfs-to-gracefully-deal-with-failures/
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
Do you still need to do the grub install?
On Dec 15, 2011 5:40 PM, Cindy Swearingen cindy.swearin...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hi Anon,
The disk that you attach to the root pool will need an SMI label
and a slice 0.
The syntax to attach a disk to create a mirrored root pool
is like this, for
is for you.
--
Andrew Gabriel
So all the bugs have been fixed? I seem to recall people on this mailing
list using mbuff to speed it up because it was so bursty and slow at one
point. IE:
http://blogs.everycity.co.uk/alasdair/2010/07/using-mbuffer-to-speed-up-slow-zfs-send-zfs-receive/
--Tim
in most environments.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:05:29 -0500, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
Doesn't a scrub do more than what
'fsck' does?
Not really. fsck will work on an offline filesystem to correct errors
and
bring it back online. Scrub
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
Every scrub I've ever done that has found an error required manual
fixing.
Every pool I've ever created has been raid-z or raid-z2, so the silent
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote
never be the building
block for a vmware cluster in the first place. I would start by rethinking
that decision instead of trying to pound a round ZFS peg into a square hole.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
disks, and let
that server take care of RAID and presenting out the storage to the rests of
the vmware hosts.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
employees want to lose their job and subsequently be subjected to a
lawsuit. If that's what you're planning on waiting for, I'd suggest you
take a new approach.
Sorry to be a downer, but that's reality.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
What are the specs on the client?
On Aug 18, 2011 10:28 AM, Thomas Nau thomas@uni-ulm.de wrote:
Dear all.
We finally got all the parts for our new fileserver following several
recommendations we got over this list. We use
Dell R715, 96GB RAM, dual 8-core Opterons
1 10GE Intel dual-port
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Frank Van Damme
frank.vanda...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/6/10 Tim Cook t...@cook.ms:
While your memory may be sufficient, that cpu is sorely lacking. Is it
even
64bit? There's a reason intel couldn't give those things away in the
early
2000s and amd
. c8t3d0 ATA-ST2000DL003-9VT1-CC32-1.82TB
So the question is, why didn't it expand? And can I fix it?
Autoexpand is likely turned off.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19253-01/819-5461/githb/index.html
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
you'd save with SIS and 15k rpm disks.
Whether that's factual I suppose is for the reader to decide.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
second - the watchdog never saw it coming :(
While your memory may be sufficient, that cpu is sorely lacking. Is it even
64bit? There's a reason intel couldn't give those things away in the early
2000s and amd was eating their lunch.
--Tim
___
zfs
remaining.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
product)?
Because they OWN the code, and the patents to protect the code.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
... the author of BIND.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2782.txt
You should probably do a bit of research before throwing out claims like
that to try to shoot someone down.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
of upgrading to Solaris 11 Express, which means my zpool
version is now too new to run anything else (AFAIK).
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
align an encapsulated guest, especially when you could have
different guest OS types on a LUN.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
?
Absolutely.
Outside of those two 2000 series, the reason there are dedup limits isn't
performance.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 5/4/2011 4:44 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 5/4/2011 4:14 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:55:55PM -0700, Brandon High
dedup on primary storage, it works in the field. The rest is
just static that doesn't matter. Let's focus on how to make ZFS better
instead of trying to guess how others are making it work, especially when
they've got a completely different implementation.
--Tim
outside of backup workloads. I'm not sure who told you/where you got the
idea that VM images are not ripe for dedup, but it's wrong.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
to build a community is by telling
anyone who suggests perhaps they might be able to give feedback that they
should be happy you're giving them any scraps at all (or in your case, not
even that).
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
a bit more manageable, but it's
still definitely a work in progress.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
2011/3/12 Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com
Tim,
Thanks.
Is there a mapping mechanism like what DataOnTap does to map the
permission/acl between NIS/LDAP and AD?
Thanks.
Fred
*From:* Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
*Sent:* 星期日, 三月 13, 2011 9:53
*To:* Fred Liu
*Cc:* zfs-discuss
the same size (although I do recall someone on this forum having
this issue with Sun OEM disks as well). It's ridiculous they don't take
into account the slight differences in drive sizes from vendor to vendor.
Forcing you to single-source your disks is a bad habit to get into IMO.
--Tim
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On 01/ 3/11 05:08 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 12/26/10 05:40 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
There are more people outside of Oracle
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On 01/ 4/11 09:15 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.comwrote:
On 01/ 3/11 05:08 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 12/26/10 05:40 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Sat, Dec
is all the armchair lawyers on this mailing
list that think they've got prior art when THEY'VE NEVER EVEN SEEN THE CODE
IN QUESTION!
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
settlements for the cost of legal defense to the victor.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
updates bi-weekly out of Sun. Nexenta spending hundreds of man-hours on a
GUI and userland apps isn't work on ZFS.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Just boot off a live cd, import the pool, and swap it that way.
I'm guessing you havent changed your failmode to continue?
On Dec 20, 2010 10:48 AM, Albert Frenz y...@zockbar.de wrote:
hi there,
i got freenas installed with a raidz1 pool of 3 disks. one of them now
failed and it gives me
You have to have a support contract to download BIOS and firmware now.
On Dec 19, 2010 12:29 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
I realize this is off-topic, but Oracle has completely
screwed up the support site from Sun. I figured someone
here would know how to obtain
Sun Fire X2100 M2
bandwidth putting them on separate ports.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
out the SAS link. You'll be fine stacking them. But
again, if you have the ports available, and already have the cables, it
won't hurt anything to use them.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
compensation. *AT BEST* I could see them releasing a binary
for OEL only that they won't be sharing with anyone else.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
anyways (whether it
be iSCSI or NFS) if your infrastructure can handle VLAN's.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
not spread unsubstantiated rumor in the first place.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
I don't believe that there is a significant risk as the NetApp patents
are
invalid because of prior art.
You are not a court of law, and that statement has
on their future plans for what was opensolaris. A leaked
internal memo is NOT official company policy. Until I see source or an
official statement, I'm not holding my breath.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
It's based on a jumper on most new drives.
On Dec 6, 2010 8:41 PM, taemun tae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 December 2010 13:25, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
There shouldn't be any problems using a 3TB drive with Solaris, so
long as you're using a 64-bit kernel. Recent versions of zfs
. The idea is
that spares are only used in an emergency. You are degraded until your
spares are no longer in use.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
6-8 months ago, but I haven't heard of
anything similar in quite some time. As for Intel, they've had their share
of issues as well. I assume you remember the data-loss inducing BIOS
password bug?
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
to what forum posts? There were issues when Crucial and a few
others released alpha firmware into production... Anandtech has put those
drives through the ringer without issue. Several people on this list are
running them as well.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Nov 27, 2010, at 16:14, Tim Cook wrote:
You don't need drivers for any SATA based SSD. It shows up as a standard
hard drive and plugs into a standard SATA port. By the time the G3 Intel
drive is out, the next gen
got 500 drives, you're going to want a
hell of a lot more ZIL space than the ddrdrive currently provides.
I'm all for benchmarks, but try doing something a bit more realistic.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
using the system as a workstation, it'd
definitely help, as applications tend to feel more responsive with an SSD.
That's all I run in my laptops now.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman
typically doesn't have any issues. I'd strongly suggest getting one of the
sandforce controller based SSD's. They're the best on the market right now
by far.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
it didn't make it into S11
Express?
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2010-July/012674.html
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
. Unless Intel
does something revolutionary, they will still be behind the Sandforce
drives.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
for 20-30 clients, each trying to compile a 15 million-line JDK at the
same time.
Lots and lots of small I/O.
:-)
Sounds like you need lots and lots of 15krpm drives instead of 7200rpm SATA
;)
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Jim Dunham james.dun...@oracle.com wrote:
Tim,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jim Dunham james.dun...@oracle.comwrote:
sridhar,
I have done the following (which is required for my case)
Created a zpool (smpool) on a device/LUN from an array (IBM 6K
for encryption than with it.
And given the ever more stringent government regulations in the US, there
are plenty of customers chomping at the bit for encryption at the storage
array.
--Tim
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
1 - 100 of 891 matches
Mail list logo
