0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:54:09PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
If you happen to find that MegaCLI is the right tool for your hardware, let
me know, and I'll paste a few commands here, which will simplify your life.
When I first started using it, I found it terribly
0n Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 08:09:22PM -0700, Brian wrote:
The fix:
the trick was to modify mode in in-kernel buffer containing
znode_phys_t and then force ZFS to flush it out to disk.
Can you give an example of how you did this ?
-Alex
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property
0n Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:54:42PM -0400, LaoTsao ?? wrote:
IMHO, U want -E for ZIL and -M for L2ARC
Why ?
-Alex
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is
subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have
0n Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:43:06PM -0800, Michael Keller wrote:
The best Mail Box to use under Dovecot for ZFS is
MailDir, each email is store as a individual file.
Can not agree on that. dbox is about 10x faster - at least if you have
1 messages in one mailbox
0n Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:49:50AM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
I have posted my ZFS Tutorial slides from USENIX LISA09 on
slideshare.net.
http://richardelling.blogspot.com/2010/01/zfs-tutorial-at-usenix-lisa09-slides.html
Is there a PDF available of this ?
-Alex
0n Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:22:19PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
Rather, ZFS works very nicely with hardware RAID systems or JBODs
iSCSI, et.al. You can happily add the
Im not sure how ZFS works very nicely with say for example an EMC Cx310 array ?
-Alex
IMPORTANT: This email
0n Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:00:49PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
On Jan 6, 2010, at 10:39 PM, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:22:19PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
Rather, ZFS works very nicely with hardware RAID systems or JBODs
iSCSI, et.al
0n Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:11:55AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
I currently have a single 17TB MetaLUN that i am about to present to an
OpenSolaris initiator and it will obviously be ZFS. However, I am
constantly
reading
Hi all,
In terms of best practices and high performance would it be better to present a
JBOD to an OpenSolaris initiator or a single MetaLUN ?
The scenario is:
I currently have a single 17TB MetaLUN that i am about to present to an
OpenSolaris initiator and it will obviously be ZFS. However, I
0n Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:11:55AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
I currently have a single 17TB MetaLUN that i am about to present to an
OpenSolaris initiator and it will obviously be ZFS. However, I am
constantly
reading
0n Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:37:23AM -0500, Mike Gerdts wrote:
FWIW, I belive that I have hit the same type of bug as the OP in the
following combinations:
- T2000, LDoms 1.0, various builds of Nevada in control and guest
domains.
- Laptop, VirtualBox 1.6.2, Windows
0n Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 10:37:26PM -0700, Chris Greer wrote:
The big thing here is I ended up getting a MASSIVE boost in
performance even with the overhead of the 1GB link, and iSCSI.
The iorate test I was using went from 3073 IOPS on 90% sequential
writes to 23953 IOPS with
0n Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:28:53PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
EMC does not, and cannot, provide end-to-end data validation. So how
would measure its data reliability? If you search the ZFS-discuss
archives,
you will find instances where people using high-end storage also
0n Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 12:57:52PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I tried installing the Sun provided samba source code package to try to do
some debugging on my own, but it won't even compile, configure fails with:
Oh, where did you get that from ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email
0n Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:00:12AM -0700, Rich Teer wrote:
Summary: Solaris Express Community Edition (SXCE) is like the OpenSolaris
of old; OpenSolaris .xx is apparently Sun's intended future direction
for Solaris. Based on what I've heard, I've not tried the latter. If I
15 matches
Mail list logo
