Does the Supermicro IPMI show anything when it crashes? Does anything show
up in event logs in the BIOS, or in system logs under OI?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Peter Wood peterwood...@gmail.com wrote:
I have two identical Supermicro boxes with 32GB ram. Hardware details at
the end of
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 05:40, Koopmann, Jan-Peter jan-pe...@koopmann.eu wrote:
Hi Brandon,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, luis Johnstone l...@luisjohnstone.com
wrote:
As far as I can tell, the Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 (HDS723030ALA640) uses
512B sectors and so I presume does not suffer
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 14:43, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Somehow I touched some rather peculiar file names in ~. Experimenting
with something I've now forgotten I guess.
Anyway I now have 3 zero length files with names -O, -c, -k.
I've tried as many styles of escaping as I
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 14:12, Tomas Forsman st...@acc.umu.se wrote:
On 10 November, 2011 - Bob Friesenhahn sent me these 1,6K bytes:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Tomas Forsman wrote:
At all times, if there's a server crash, ZFS will come back along at next
boot or mount, and the filesystem will be in
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 09:03, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
Actually, your biggest bottleneck will be the IOPS limits of the drives. A
7200RPM SATA drive tops out at 100 IOPS. Yup. That's it.
So, if you need to do 62.5e6 IOPS, and the rebuild drive can do just 100
IOPS, that
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 21:58, Kishore Kumar Pusukuri
kish...@cs.ucr.edu wrote:
Hi,
I am surprised with the performances of some 64-bit multi-threaded
applications on my AMD Opteron machine. For most of the applications, the
performance of 32-bit version is almost same as the performance of
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 04:33, Lutz Schumann presa...@storageconcepts.de wrote:
Hello list,
I wanted to test deduplication a little and did a experiment.
My question was: can I dedupe infinite or is ther a upper limit ?
So for that I did a very basic test.
- I created a ramdisk-pool (1GB)
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 00:56, Marc Bevand m.bev...@gmail.com wrote:
Giovanni Tirloni gtirloni at sysdroid.com writes:
The chassis has 4 columns of 6 disks. The 18 disks I was testing were
all on columns #1 #2 #3.
Good, so this confirms my estimations. I know you said the current
~810 MB/s
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 16:51, Oliver Seidel o...@os1.net wrote:
Hello,
I'm a grown-up and willing to read, but I can't find where to read. Please
point me to the place that explains how I can diagnose this situation: adding
a mirror to a disk fills the mirror with an apparent rate of
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 20:08, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Seems like you can get some pretty large discrepancies in sizes of
pools. and directories.
They all answer different things, sure, but they're all things that an
administrator might want to know.
zpool list
How many bytes
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 23:59, Willard Korfhage opensola...@familyk.org wrote:
I'm struggling to get a reliable OpenSolaris system on a file server. I'm
running an Asus P5BV-C/4L server motherboard, 4GB ECC ram, an E3110
processor, and an Areca 1230 with 12 1-TB disks attached. In a previous
I just bought a new set of disks, and want to move my primary data
store over to the new disks. I created a new pool fine, and now I'm
trying to use zfs send -R | zfs receive to transfer the data. Here's
the error I got:
$ pfexec zfs send -Rpv h...@next | pfexec zfs receive -duvF temp
sending
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 17:51, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com wrote:
This process took about 12 hours to do, so it's frustrating that
(apparently) snapshots disappearing causes the replication to fail.
Perhaps some sort
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 14:44, Chris Murray chrismurra...@gmail.com wrote:
Good evening,
I understand that NTFS VMDK do not relate to Solaris or ZFS, but I was
wondering if anyone has any experience of checking the alignment of data
blocks through that stack?
It seems to me there's a simple
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 15:53, Jeff Freeman freeman.jeff...@verizon.net wrote:
Can anyone help wih this - somewhat of a novice here with OpenSolaris and
just found these erros.
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
vmwarepool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 17:06, Brian E. Imhoff beimh...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am in the proof-of-concept phase of building a large ZFS/Solaris based SAN
box, and am experiencing absolutely poor / unusable performance.
I then, Create a zpool, using raidz2, using all 24 drives, 1 as a hotspare:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:41, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
Rob Logan wrote:
a 1U or 2U JBOD chassis for 2.5 drives,
from http://supermicro.com/products/nfo/chassis_storage.cfm the E1
(single) or E2 (dual) options have a SAS expander so
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 20:41, Mark Bennett mark.benn...@public.co.nz wrote:
Will,
sorry for picking an old thread,
That's okay---I liked this thread ;)
but you mentioned a psu monitor to supplement the CSE-PTJBOD-CB1.
I have two of these and am interested in your design.
Oddly, the LSI
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 13:06, Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 21:29, Bill Sommerfeld sommerf...@sun.com wrote:
Any suggestions?
Let it run for another day.
I'll let it keep running as long as it wants this time.
scrub: scrub completed after 42h32m with 0
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:11, Jonathan Edwards
jonathan.edwa...@sun.com wrote:
out of curiousity - do you have a lot of small files in the filesystem?
Most of the space in the filesystem is taken by a few large files, but
most of the files in the filesystem are small. For example, I have my
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 21:29, Bill Sommerfeld sommerf...@sun.com wrote:
Any suggestions?
Let it run for another day.
I'll let it keep running as long as it wants this time.
I suspect the combination of frequent time-based snapshots and a pretty
active set of users causes the progress
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 03:27, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
I left the scrub running all day:
scrub: scrub in progress for 67h57m, 100.00% done, 0h0m to go
but as you can see, it didn't finish. So, I ran pkg image-update,
rebooted, and am now running b122. On reboot, the scrub restarted
an
update in about 17 hours ;)
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 18:06, Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 15:59, Henrik Johansson henr...@henkis.net wrote:
Hello Will,
On Sep 7, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Will Murnane wrote:
What can cause this kind of behavior, and how can I make
I have a pool composed of a single raidz2 vdev, which is currently
degraded (missing a disk):
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool DEGRADED 0 0 0
raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0
c8d1 ONLINE 0 0 0
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:05, Chris Gerhard chris.gerh...@sun.com wrote:
Looks like this bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6655927
Workaround: Don't run zpool status as root.
I'm not, and yet the scrub continues. To be more specific, here's a
complete current interaction
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 15:59, Henrik Johansson henr...@henkis.net wrote:
Hello Will,
On Sep 7, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Will Murnane wrote:
What can cause this kind of behavior, and how can I make my pool
finish scrubbing?
No idea what is causing this but did you try to stop the scrub?
I haven't
zfs recv -vn file will check the integrity of the zfs stream in
file. However, this is only a one-time check; if the data is
corrupted later the stream will not be recoverable. You might
consider using something like par2 [1] to generate parity:
while true:
zfs send f...@snap file
generate
Your issue may be due to a problem I ran into with 'cw' not generating
the proper arguments for the C compiler. I've only used the Sun
Studio C compiler to build the kernel.
My notes on how I build the kernel are on my blog, in two parts:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:55, Richard Ellingrichard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
Alice$ cd ~/proj1; ln -s /etc .,
Alice$ echo Hi helpdesk, Bob is on vacation and he has a bunch of
files in my home directory for a project that we are working on
together. Unfortunately, his umask was messed up and
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 13:35, Alex Lam S.L.alexla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have a raid-z(1) data pool with smb=name=data (4x750GB local SATA
II), which I open up for my Windows machines to dump files into.
Trouble is, the SMB share would disappear from the network at least
once a
I'm using Solaris 10u6 updated to u7 via patches, and I have a pool
with a mirrored pair and a (shared) hot spare. We reconfigured disks
a while ago and now the controller is c4 instead of c2. The hot spare
was originally on c2, and apparently on rebooting it didn't get found.
So, I looked up
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:05, cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Will,
It looks to me like you are running into this bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6664649
This is fixed in Nevada and a fix will also be available in an
upcoming Solaris 10 release.
That
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 14:50, Kurt Olsenno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I'm using an Acard ANS-9010B (configured with 12 GB battery backed ECC RAM w/
16 GB CF card for longer term power losses. Device cost $250, RAM cost about
$120, and the CF around $100.) It just shows up as a SATA drive.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:04, Brianno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Just a quick question before I address everyone else.
I bought this connector
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812198020
However its pretty clear to me now (after Ive ordered it) that it won't at
all
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 05:44, F. Wesselsno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Also in reply to the previous email by Will.
Can anyone shed more light on the combination lsi sas hba , the lsisasx36
expander chip (or it's relatives) and sata disks.
I'm investigating a migration from discrete
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 21:30, Rob Loganr...@logan.com wrote:
c4 scsi-bus connected configured
unknown
c4::dsk/c4t15d0 disk connected configured
unknown
:
c4::dsk/c4t33d0 disk connected configured
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:43, Adam Shermanasher...@versature.com wrote:
On 17-Jul-09, at 1:45 , Will Murnane wrote:
I'm looking at the LSI SAS3801X because it seems to be what Sun OEMs for
my
X4100s:
If you're given the choice (i.e., you have the M2 revision), PCI
Express is probably
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 17:02, Adam Shermanasher...@versature.com wrote:
Hello All,
I'm just starting to think about building some mass-storage arrays and am
looking to better understand some of the components involved.
For example, the Supermicro SC826 series of systems is available with
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 20:20, Adam Shermanasher...@versature.com wrote:
Ever seen/read about anyone use this kind of setup for HA clustering? I'm
getting ideas about Open HA/Solaris Cluster on top of this setup with two
systems connecting, that would rock!
It's possible that this would work
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 21:16, Rob Loganr...@logan.com wrote:
I'm confused, I though expanders only worked with SAS disk, and SATA disks
took an entire SAS port. could someone post an output showing more than 4
SATA
drives across one InfiniBand cable (4 SAS ports)
2 % cfgadm | grep sata
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 21:35, Adam Shermanasher...@versature.com wrote:
I'm looking at the LSI SAS3801X because it seems to be what Sun OEMs for my
X4100s:
If you're given the choice (i.e., you have the M2 revision), PCI
Express is probably the bus to go with. It's basically the same card,
but
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 14:18, Clayton Wheelerno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I'm setting up OpenSolaris on Amazon EC2, and planning on using their Elastic
Block Store volumes to store a persistent ZFS zpool. I'm inclined to make a
mirror of two EBS volumes (essentially LUNs with snapshot
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:42, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
djm == Darren J Moffat darr...@opensolaris.org writes:
djm a) it was highly dangerous and involved using multiple
djm different zfs kernel modules was well as
however...utter hogwash! Nothing is ``highly dangerous'' when
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:45, James Andrewartha jam...@daa.com.au wrote:
myxi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Bouncing a thread from the device drivers list:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=357176
Does anybody know if OpenSolaris will support this new Supermicro card,
based on
I have a pool, huge, composed of one six-disk raidz2 vdev and a log
device. I failed to plug in one disk when I took the machine down to
plug in the log device, and booted all the way before I realized this,
so the raidz2 vdev was rightly listed as degraded. Then I brought the
machine down,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 07:03, Robert Milkowski mi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Thursday, April 9, 2009, 3:35:07 PM, you wrote:
DR Jonathan schrieb:
OpenSolaris Forums wrote:
if you have a snapshot of your files and rsync the same files again,
you need to use --inplace rsync option
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:02, Nicholas Lee emptysa...@gmail.com wrote:
There's also the ACARD device:
acard ANS-9010B $250
plus 8GB RAM $86
plus 16GB CF $44
It's also got a battery but can dump/restore the RAM to a CF card.
It's
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 14:57, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Harry Putnam wrote:
So raidz1 would probably be adequate for me... I wouldn't be putting
it to the test like a commercial operation might.
Yes, but it is pointless to use it with three
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 18:30, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
I love the way they use the numbers 3800 and 3080, so you are
constantly transposing them thus leaving google littered with all
this confusingly wrong information.
Think of the middle two digits as (number of external ports,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 18:48, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
I'm probably overlooking a lot of functionality in man zfs but as
always its difficult to really understand the various cmds and
properties when lacking real experience.
After having a created zpool raidz1 from various parts
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:12, Tim t...@tcsac.net wrote:
I wouldn't think grabbing 8GB memory would be a big deal after dropping that
much on the controller??
There being no sense in half measures, I ordered 12GB (i.e., three
kits) of this:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 04:51, Nicola Fankhauser
nicola.fankhau...@variant.ch wrote:
hi
I have a AOC-USAS-L8i working in both a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3P and Gigabyte
GA-EG45M-DS2H under OpenSolaris build 104+ (Nexenta Core 2.0 beta).
Very cool! It's good to see people having success with this
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 19:02, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
There's a post there from a guy using two of the AOC-USAS-L8i in his
system here:
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1033321345
Read again---he's using the AOC-SAT2-MV8, which is PCI-X. That is
known to work fine, even in
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 20:05, Tim t...@tcsac.net wrote:
Are you selectively ignoring responses to this thread or something? Dave
has already stated he *HAS IT WORKING TODAY*.
No, I saw that post. However, I saw one unequivocal it doesn't work
earlier (even if I can't show it to you), which
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 21:59, Jan Hlodan jh231...@mail-emea.sun.com wrote:
I would like to import 3. partition as a another pool but I can't see this
partition.
sh-3.2# format -e
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c7t0d0 drive type unknown
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:25, Rafael Friedlander r...@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
(I am sorry but I don't have a system where I can run commands).
Is it OK to create a zpool adding log and cache options?
Yes, this usage is explicitly mentioned in the man page [1].
Will
[1]:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 23:00, Will Murnane will.murn...@gmail.com wrote:
*sigh* The 9010b is ordered. Ground shipping, unfortunately, but
eventually I'll post my impressions of it.
Well, the drive arrived today. It's as nice-looking as it appears in
the pictures, and building a zpool out
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:30, Frank Cusack fcus...@fcusack.com wrote:
recommendations for an alternative?
At work we just ordered a Supermicro CSE-846E1-R900B [1]: 24 hot-swap
bays, redundant 900W power supplies, LSI SAS expander. This doesn't
quite make a JBOD by itself (it's designed to be
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 21:11, Nathan Kroenert nathan.kroen...@sun.com wrote:
Seems a little pricey for what it is though.
For what it's worth, there's also a 9010B model that has only one sata
port and room for six dimms instead of eight at $250 instead of $400.
That might fit in your budget a
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 22:44, Nathan Kroenert nathan.kroen...@sun.com wrote:
You could be the first...
Man up! ;)
*sigh* The 9010b is ordered. Ground shipping, unfortunately, but
eventually I'll post my impressions of it.
Will
Nathan.
Will Murnane wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 21:11
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 07:37, Peter van Gemert opensola...@petervg.nl wrote:
Is there any way I can create concat pools.
Not that I'm aware of. However, pools that are not redundant at the
zpool level (i.e., mirror or raidz{,2}) are prone to becoming
irrevocably faulted; creating non-redundant
We have been using ZFS for user home directories for a good while now.
When we discovered the problem with full filesystems not allowing
deletes over NFS, we became very anxious to fix this; our users fill
their quotas on a fairly regular basis, so it's important that they
have a simple recourse
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 19:04, Chris Kirby chris.ki...@sun.com wrote:
On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Will Murnane wrote:
(on the client workstation)
wil...@chasca:~$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=bigfile
dd: closing output file `bigfile': Disk quota exceeded
wil...@chasca:~$ rm bigfile
rm: cannot
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 16:38, Louis Hoefler louis.hoef...@struktum.com wrote:
Is it possible to share a folder with cifs without adding a zfs volume?
Try zfs set sharesmb=on mypool.
I also have not found out how to share a folder with zfs, is it possible?
I don't think sharing an individual
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 16:51, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
I appreciate that in these times of financial hardship that you can
not afford a 750GB drive to replace the oversized 500GB drive. Sorry
to hear about your situation.
That's easy to say, but what if there were
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 18:19, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
What do you propose that OpenSolaris should do about this?
Take drive size, divide by 100, round down to two significant digits.
Floor to a multiple of that size. This method wastes no more than 1%
of the disk
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 02:36, Gray Carper gcar...@umich.edu wrote:
In the third test, we rebuilt the ZFS pool with the ZIL on a 32GB SSD and
the L2ARC on four 80GB SSDs.
An obvious question: what SSDs are these? Where did you get them?
Many, many consumer-level MLC SSDs have controllers by
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 21:51, casper@sun.com wrote:
The performance issue of using a drive to multiple unrelated
consumers (ZFS UFS) is that, if both are active at the
same time, this will defeat the I/O scheduling smarts
implemented in ZFS. Rather than have data streaming to
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 09:28, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
I'm pretty darned sure that the LSI 1068-based HBAs will do true
JBOD. Supermicro makes two such beasts: AOC-USAS-L8i and
AOC-USASLP-L8i Both are 8-port PCI-Express x4 cards.
No, both are UIO cards. They're
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 17:12, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:
The Samsung HD103UJ drives are nice, if you're not using
NVidia controllers - there's a bug in either the drives or the
controllers that makes them drop drives fairly frequently.
Do you happen to have more details about this
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:01, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thank you. How does raidz2 compare to raid-2? Safer? Less safe?
Raid-2 is much less used, for one, uses many more disks for parity,
for two, and is much slower in any application I can think of.
Suppose you have 11
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 14:38, Richard Morris - Sun Microsystems -
Burlington United States richard.mor...@sun.com wrote:
As you point out, the -c option is user friendly while the -depth (or
maybe -d) option is more general. There have been several requests for
the -c option. Would anyone
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:45, Joel Buckley joel.buck...@sun.com wrote:
Consider the engineering effort going into every Sun Server.
Any system from Sun is more than sufficient for a home server.
You want more disks, then buy one with more slots. Done.
In my experience, buying disks (or
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:30, Roger go...@sajberhagen.com wrote:
How do i share a zfs conatiner with iscsi?
Running OpenSolaris, yes? Try pfexec pkg install SUNWiscsitgt
first. Or pkg info SUNWiscsitgt to see details on the package
first.
Will
___
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 18:46, Gary Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
storage device provides reliability and integrity for the blocks of
data that it serves, and does this well.
But not well enough. Even if the storage does a perfect job keeping
its bits correct on disk, there are a lot of
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 13:03, Seymour Krebs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
~# zfs destroy -r rpool/ROOT/b99
cannot destroy 'rpool/ROOT/b99': filesystem has dependent clones
Take a look at the output of zfs get origin for the other
filesystems in the pool. One of them is a clone of rpool/ROOT/b99; to
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:15, Paul Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you've got a zpool across 46 (48?) of the disks?
When I was looking into our thumpers everyone seemed to think a raidz
over
more than 10 disks was a hideous idea.
A vdev that size is bad, a pool that size composed of
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:40, Scara Maccai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still don't understand why even the one on http://www.opensolaris.com/, ZFS
– A Smashing Hit, doesn't show the app running in the moment the HD is
smashed... weird...
ZFS is primarily about protecting your data: correctness,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 14:35, Charles Menser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 5 drive raidz2 pool which I have a iscsi share on. While
backing up a MacOS drive to it I noticed some very strange access
patterns, and wanted to know if what I am seeing is normal, or not.
There are times when
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 20:54, BJ Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Dedup is what I really want, but it's not implemented yet.
Yes, as I read it. greenBytes [1] claims to have dedup on their
system; you might investigate them if you decide rsync won't work for
your application.
2. The only
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:32, Philipp Tobler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
the Barracuda ES.2 disks from Seagate are available in a SAS-version
and would seem to be a perfect fit for J4000 arrays. Does anyone have
any experience with these disks? Is it possible to install disks in
the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:10, gm_sjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate 99% of the time people only comment if they have a
problem, which is why I think it'd be nice for some people who have
successfully implemented ZFS, including making various use of the
features (recovery, replacing
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 18:30, Scott Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, also I kind of doubt that a 750W power supply will spin 16 disks
up reliably. I have 10 in mine with a 600W supply, and it's
borderline--10 drives work, 11 doesn't, and adding a couple extra PCI
cards has pushed mine over
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 23:51, Scott Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most 3.5 drives want
about 30W at startup; that'd be around 780W with 16 drives.
I'm not sure what kind of math you're using here.
See
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 14:00, dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do I have to do to be able to switch this drive?
I'd suggest running zpool import. If that doesn't show the pool,
put it back in the external enclosure, run zpool export mypool and
then see if it shows up in zpool
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 18:51, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what's wrong with this card?
http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USASLP-L8i.cfm
If you have a UIO slot (many recent Supermicro boards do) then it's a
fine choice. But if you have a non-Supermicro board, you may
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 21:59, Miles Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wm == Will Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
wm I'd rather have a working closed blob than a driver that is
wm Free Software for a device that is faulty. Ideals are very
wm nice, but broken hardware isn't.
except
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 21:51, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a UIO card. It's a standard PCI-E card. What the description
is telling you is that you can combine it with a UIO card to add raid
functionality as there is none built-in.
Not so. The description [1] mentions that this
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 13:38, Miles Nordin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. too bad Sil is the only ones selling chips on PCI cards that have
source code for their drivers.
Indeed, it is too bad. But I'd rather have a working closed blob than
a driver that is Free Software for a device that is
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 15:39, jonathan sai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Need to trouble you to open up the pdf. Customer has included int he doc
configuration that they are having and at the end their query. Appreciate
any help to respond to the customer.
First, it's not recommended to
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 16:56, Matt Beebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how 'bout it hardware vendors? when can we get a PCIe(x8) SAS/SATA
controller with an x4 internal port and an x4 external port and 512MB battery
backed cache for about $250?? :) Heck, I'd take SATA only if I could get it
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 15:08, Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should mention that if copying the file causes it to be nicely
compressed, then you can use this to your advantage. Your log-file
rotator can copy the file and delete the original rather than just
renaming it. You would
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:44, Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fiber channel ... offers a bit more bandwidth than SAS.
The bandwidth part of this statement is not accurate. SAS uses wide
ports composed of (usually, other widths are possible) four 3 gbit
links. Each of these has a
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 15:39, Barton Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Forgive my ignorance of ZFS, but I have a customer that would like to set up
three 14+2 raidz2 groups on a new thor with 48 1TB drives (updated thumper)
so that 42TB for data could be achieved. What performance or other
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:41, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't doubt the superiority of LaTex/Framemaker in conjunction with
Distiller in producing nicely typeset books and brochures. But how good is a
tool if it produces a product that its intended users can NOT read? This
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 00:15, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question #1:
I've seen 5-6 disk zpools are the most recommended setup.
In traditional RAID terms, I would like to do RAID5 + hot spare (13 disks
usable) out of the 15 disks (like raidz2 I suppose). What would make the most
sense
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 05:17, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone here had any luck using a CF to SATA adapter?
I have two of these:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 18:40, Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The errant command which accidentally adds a vdev could just as easily
be a command which scrambles up or erases all of the data.
True enough---but if there's a way to undo accidentally adding a vdev,
there's one source of
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 07:42, Borys Saulyak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got, lets say, 10 disks in the storage. They are currently in RAID5
configuration and given to my box as one LUN. You suggest to create 10 LUNs
instead, and give them to ZFS, where they will be part of one raidz,
I've got a pool which I'm currently syncing a few hundred gigabytes to
using rsync. The source machine is pretty slow, so it only goes at
about 20 MB/s. Watching zpool iostat -v local-space 10, I see a
pattern like this (trimmed to take up less space):
capacity operations
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
