Hello,
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Yes, I have SSD for ZIL. Just one SSD. 32G. But if this is the problem,
then you'll have the same poor performance on the local machine that you
have over NFS. So I'm curious to see if you have the same poor performance
locally. The ZIL does not need to be
Hello,
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, mbr wrote:
What about the data that were on the ZILlog SSD at the time of
failure, is
a copy of the data still in the machines memory from where it can be used
to put the transaction to the stable storage pool?
The intent log SSD is used
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Meilicke wrote:
I second the use of zilstat - very useful, especially if you don't want to mess
around with adding a log device and then having to destroy the pool if you don't
want the log device any longer.
log devices can be removed as of zpool version 19.
no
