I spend yesterday all day evading my data of one of the Windows disks, so that
I can add it to the pool. Using mount-ntfs, it's a pain due to its slowness.
But once I finished, I thought Cool, let's do it. So I added the disk using
the zero slice notation (c0d0s0), as suggested for performance
On May 5, 2007, at 09:34, Mario Goebbels wrote:
I spend yesterday all day evading my data of one of the Windows
disks, so that I can add it to the pool. Using mount-ntfs, it's a
pain due to its slowness. But once I finished, I thought Cool,
let's do it. So I added the disk using the zero
Mario Goebbels wrote:
do it. So I added the disk using the zero slice notation (c0d0s0),
as suggested for performance reasons. I checked the pool status and
noticed however that the pool size didn't raise.
I believe you got this wrong. You should have given ZFS the whole disk -
c0d0 and not a
