However, I can't help but think that if my file server is
compressing every data block that it writes that it would be able to write
more data if it used a thread (or more) per core I would come out ahead.
No arguments here. MT-hot compression was the design of ZFS from day one.
A bug got
On 8/21/06, Richard Elling - PAE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't done measurements of this in years, but...I'll wager that compression is memory bound, not CPU bound, for today'sservers.A system with low latency and high bandwidth memory will performwell (UltraSPARC-T1).Threading may not help
Team
During a ZFS presentation I had a question from Vernon which I could not
answer and did not find with a quick look through the archives.
Q: What's the effect (if any) of only having on Floating Point Processor
on Niagara when you turn on ZFS compression?
--
On 8/20/06, trevor pretty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Team
During a ZFS presentation I had a question from Vernon which I could not
answer and did not find with a quick look through the archives.
Q: What's the effect (if any) of only having on Floating Point Processor
on Niagara when you turn on
On 8/20/06, Mike Gerdts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/20/06, James Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/20/06, trevor pretty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Team
During a ZFS presentation I had a question from Vernon which I could not
answer and did not find with a quick look through the
Matthew,
On 8/20/06 6:20 PM, Matthew Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was not the design, we're working on fixing this bug so that many
threads will be used to do the compression.
Is this also true of decompression?
- Luke
___
zfs-discuss
On our Niagara T2000 32x1000mhz box, 8 gigs ram, 4x68gig disk drives .
we setup three drives as raidz with compression. all of our performance
issues are gone. remember we receive ~150 million lines of ASCII and 2
million files per day . we have had zero performance issues since we
1)
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006, Sean Meighan wrote:
On our Niagara T2000 32x1000mhz box, 8 gigs ram, 4x68gig disk drives . we
setup three drives as raidz with compression. all of our performance issues
are gone. remember we receive ~150 million lines of ASCII and 2 million files
per day . we have had
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:38:03PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
Matthew,
On 8/20/06 6:20 PM, Matthew Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was not the design, we're working on fixing this bug so that many
threads will be used to do the compression.
Is this also true of decompression?
I