On 7/11/07, Matthew Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This restore problem is my key worry in deploying ZFS in the area
where I see it as most beneficial. Another solution that would deal
with the same problem is block-level deduplication. So far my queries
in this area have been met with
Mike Gerdts wrote:
Perhaps a better approach is to create a pseudo file system that looks like:
mntpt/pool
/@@
/@today
/@yesterday
/fs
/@@
/@2007-06-01
/otherfs
/@@
How is this
On 7/11/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
Perhaps a better approach is to create a pseudo file system that looks like:
mntpt/pool
/@@
/@today
/@yesterday
/fs
/@@
/@2007-06-01
This restore problem is my key worry in deploying ZFS in the area
where I see it as most beneficial. Another solution that would deal
with the same problem is block-level deduplication. So far my queries
in this area have been met with silence.
I must have missed your messages on
As I have been grappling with how I will manage ZFS backups using
existing enterprise backup tools (e.g. Netbackup), it seems as though
two approaches continue to dominate:
1) Just use the POSIX interface like is used for UFS,
VxFS, etc. This has key the disadvantage that it
is not
