[zfs-discuss] Re: user undo

2006-06-11 Thread can you guess?
Interesting thread - a few comments: Finite-sized validation checksums aren't a 100% solution either, but they're certainly good enough to be extremely useful. NetApp has built a rather decent business at least in part by providing less-than-100% user-level undo-style facilities via snapshots

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: user undo

2006-06-11 Thread David Magda
On Jun 11, 2006, at 03:21, can you guess? wrote: My dim recollection is that TOPS-10 implemented its popular (but again 100%) undelete mechanism using the same kind of 'space- available' approach suggested here. It did, however, support explicit 'delete - I really mean it' facilities to

[zfs-discuss] Re: user undo

2006-05-26 Thread Anton B. Rang
Anything that attempts to append characters on the end of the filename will run into trouble when the file name is already at NAME_MAX. One simple solution is to restrict the total length of the name to NAME_MAX, truncating the original filename as necessary to allow appending. This does