I am pretty sure the T3/6120/6320 firmware does not support the
SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE commands..
Off the top of my head, I do not know if that triggers any change in behavior
on the Solaris side...
The firmware does support the use of the FUA bit...which would potentially lead
to similar flushing
5:32 AM
To: Leon Koll
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)
Leon Koll writes:
Welcome to the club, Andy...
I tried several times to attract the attention of the community to the
dramatic performance degradation (about 3 times
Leon Koll,
As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something.
The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question
whether you ra n NFSv4. I would expect a major change in
performance just to version 4 NFS version and ZFS.
The benchmark
: Sun 4/22/2007 4:50 AM
To: Leon Koll
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)
Leon Koll,
As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something.
The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question
whether you
Welcome to the club, Andy...
I tried several times to attract the attention of the community to the dramatic
performance degradation (about 3 times) of NFZ/ZFS vs. ZFS/UFS combination -
without any result : a
href=http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=98592;[1]/a , a
