Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: system wont boot after zfs

2006-11-30 Thread Jonathan Edwards
: system wont boot after zfs I suspect a lack of an MBR could cause some BIOS implementations to barf .. Why? Zeroed disks don't have that issue either. What appears to be happening is more that raid controllers attempt to interpret the data in the EFI label as the proprietary hardware raid labels

[zfs-discuss] Re: system wont boot after zfs

2006-11-29 Thread David Elefante
I had the same thing happen to me twice on my x86 box. I installed ZFS (RaidZ) on my enclosure with four drives and upon reboot the bios hangs upon detection of the newly EFI'd drives. I've already RMA'd 4 drives to seagate and the new batch was frozen as well. I was suspecting my enclosure,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: system wont boot after zfs

2006-11-29 Thread Toby Thain
On 29-Nov-06, at 9:30 AM, David Elefante wrote: I had the same thing happen to me twice on my x86 box. I installed ZFS (RaidZ) on my enclosure with four drives and upon reboot the bios hangs upon detection of the newly EFI'd drives. ... This seems to me to be a serious problem.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: system wont boot after zfs

2006-11-29 Thread James McPherson
On 11/30/06, David Elefante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had the same thing happen to me twice on my x86 box. I installed ZFS (RaidZ) on my enclosure with four drives and upon reboot the bios hangs upon detection of the newly EFI'd drives. I've already RMA'd 4 drives to seagate and the new batch

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: system wont boot after zfs

2006-11-29 Thread Casper . Dik
This is a problem since how can anyone use ZFS on a PC??? My motherboard is a newly minted AM2 w/ all the latest firmware. I disabled boot detection on the sata channels and it still refuses to b oot. I had to purchase an external SATA enclosure to fix the drives. This seems to me to be a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: system wont boot after zfs

2006-11-29 Thread Casper . Dik
I suspect a lack of an MBR could cause some BIOS implementations to barf .. Why? Zeroed disks don't have that issue either. What appears to be happening is more that raid controllers attempt to interpret the data in the EFI label as the proprietary hardware raid labels. At least, it seems