On 9/1/06, Matthew Ahrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marlanne DeLaSource wrote:
Thanks for all your answers.
The initial idea was to make a dataset/snapshot and clone (fast) and then
separate the clone from its snapshot. The clone could be then used as a new
independant dataset.
The
Mike Gerdts wrote:
A couple scenarios from environments that I work in, using legacy
file systems and volume managers:
1) Various test copies need to be on different spindles to remove any
perceived or real performance impact imposed by one or the other.
Arguably by having the IO activity
Thanks for all your answers.
The initial idea was to make a dataset/snapshot and clone (fast) and then
separate the clone from its snapshot. The clone could be then used as a new
independant dataset.
The send/receive subcommands are probably the only way to duplicate a dataset.
This
