Re: [zfs-discuss] The size of a storage pool

2006-12-19 Thread Nathalie Poulet (IPSL)
Hello, After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account. The correct size is indicated by the order zpool list. The order df - k shows a size higher

Re: [zfs-discuss] The size of a storage pool

2006-12-19 Thread Tomas Ă–gren
On 19 December, 2006 - Nathalie Poulet (IPSL) sent me these 1,4K bytes: Hello, After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account. The correct size

Re: [zfs-discuss] The size of a storage pool

2006-12-19 Thread Matthew Ahrens
Nathalie Poulet (IPSL) wrote: Hello, After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account. The correct size is indicated by the order zpool list. The

[zfs-discuss] The size of a storage pool

2006-12-18 Thread Nathalie Poulet (IPSL)
I have a machine with ZFS connected to a SAN. The space of storage increased on the SAN. The order format shows the increase in volume well. But the size of the ZFS pool did not increase. What to make so that zfs takes into account this increase in volume? Thanks, Nathalie.

Re: [zfs-discuss] The size of a storage pool

2006-12-18 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Nathalie, Monday, December 18, 2006, 2:14:29 PM, you wrote: NPI I have a machine with ZFS connected to a SAN. The space of storage NPI increased on the SAN. The order format shows the increase in volume NPI well. But the size of the ZFS pool did not increase. What to make so NPI that