To have Mac OS X connect via iSCSI:
http://krypted.com/mac-os-x/how-to-use-iscsi-on-mac-os-x/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
[Just do not want to be misleading]
I think there is one aspect of the Zhou style is heavily misleading.
And that is how do we deal with ladies.
Personally, I have my opinions about ladies being open and career-minded, but
those are not important.
What is important, would be how should we deal
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:46 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote:
I don't know if this email is even relevant to the list discussion. I will
leave that conclusion to the smart mail server policy here.
*cough*
--
Brent Jones
br...@servuhome.net
Joel Buckley wrote:
Search http://store.sun.com; for the item that matches your
needs and run with it. Sun currently has a promotion on X4150
Servers... That will easily be able to serve NFS, SunRay,
etc... to your home.
Do they come with free ear plugs for the family? :)
--
Ian.
Kornpeter.k...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
OMG!
what a critical factor I just didn't think about!!!
stupid me!
Moog, please, which laptops are supporting ZFS today?
I will only buy within those.
z, at home, feeling better, but still a bit confused
On Thu, January 8, 2009 15:35, Tim wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:43 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote:
Can we focus on commercial usage?
please!
I dunno about you, but I need somewhere to store that music so I can
stream
it throughout the house while I'm drinking that wine ;)
re == Richard Elling richard.ell...@sun.com writes:
re Flash has been around for well over 25 years
there is NOR flash and NAND flash, though. I think NOR is 25 years
old, and MLC and SLC FLASH are both NAND right? NOR and NAND have
completely different behavior and implementation, and
: David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
On Thu, January 8, 2009 15:35, Tim wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:43 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote:
Can we focus
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 17:12, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:
The Samsung HD103UJ drives are nice, if you're not using
NVidia controllers - there's a bug in either the drives or the
controllers that makes them drop drives fairly frequently.
Do you happen to have more details about this
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:43 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote:
ok, Scott, that sounded sincere. I am not going to do the pic thing on you.
But do I have to spell this out to you -- somethings are invented not for
home use?
Cindy, would you want to do ZFS at home, or just having
Message -
From: Tim
To: JZ
Cc: Scott Laird ; Brandon High ; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org ; Peter Korn
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:43 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote
: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Joel Buckley joel.buck...@sun.com
wrote:
How much is your time worth?
Quite a bit
To: JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com
Cc: Scott Laird sc...@sigkill.org; Brandon High bh...@freaks.com;
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Peter Korn peter.k...@sun.com
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
On 7-Jan-09, at 9:43 PM, JZ wrote
-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
On 7-Jan-09, at 9:43 PM, JZ wrote:
ok, Scott, that sounded sincere. I am not going to do the pic thing on
you.
But do I have to spell this out to you -- somethings are invented not
for
home use?
Cindy, would you want to do ZFS at home,
Why
-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
Today? Low-power SSDs are probably less reliable than low-power hard
drives, although they're too new to really know for certain. Given
the number of problems that vendors have had getting acceptable write
speeds, I'd be really amazed if they've done
, January 08, 2009 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
Thanks Scott,
I was really itchy to order one, now I just want to save that open $ for
Remy+++.
Then, next question, can I trust any HD for my home laptop? should I go
get
a Sony VAIO or a cheap China-made
...@freaks.com; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Peter Korn
peter.k...@sun.com; Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
Today? Low-power SSDs are probably less reliable than low-power hard
drives
peter.k...@sun.com; Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
You can't trust any hard drive. That's what backups are for :-).
Laptop hard drives aren't much worse than desktop drives
-discuss@opensolaris.org; Peter Kornpeter.k...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
Thanks much Scott,
I still don't know what you are talking about -- my $3000 to $800 laptops
all never needed to swap any drive.
But yeah, I got hit on all of them when I was in china
...@excelsioritsolutions.com;
zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org; Scott Laird sc...@sigkill.org
Cc: Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com;
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Peter Korn peter.k...@sun.com
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS
Scott Laird wrote:
Today? Low-power SSDs are probably less reliable than low-power hard
drives, although they're too new to really know for certain. Given
the number of problems that vendors have had getting acceptable write
speeds, I'd be really amazed if they've done any real work on
...@sun.com
To: Scott Laird sc...@sigkill.org
Cc: JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com; Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com; zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Peter
Korn peter.k...@sun.com
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
Scott Laird
I'm looking to do the same thing - home NAS with ZFS.
I'm debating several routes/options, and I'd appreciate opinions from folks
here.
My system will primarily be a file music server, serving CIFS and some NFS as
well as driving multiple concurrent audio streams via SqueezeCenter, and
Dude,
How much is your time worth?
Consider the engineering effort going into every Sun Server.
Any system from Sun is more than sufficient for a home server.
You want more disks, then buy one with more slots. Done.
Search http://store.sun.com; for the item that matches your
needs and run with
On Wed, January 7, 2009 04:29, Peter Korn wrote:
Decision #4: file system layout
I'd like to have ZFS root mirrored. Do we simply use a portion of the
existing disks for this, or add two disks just for root? Use USB-2
flash as those 2 disks? And where does swap go?
The default install in
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:45, Joel Buckley joel.buck...@sun.com wrote:
Consider the engineering effort going into every Sun Server.
Any system from Sun is more than sufficient for a home server.
You want more disks, then buy one with more slots. Done.
In my experience, buying disks (or
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Tim t...@tcsac.net wrote:
Decision #2: 1.5TB Seagate vs. 1TB WD (or someone else)
The 1.5TB drives have a sketchy reputation as compared to any other
Seagate drives. The rumor is that reliability was not high enough for
the OEMs to carry them, so that's
So I have just finished building something similar to this...
I'm finally replacing my Pentium II 400Mhz fileserver!
My setup is:
Opensolaris 2008.11
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138117
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145184
The Samsung HD103UJ drives are nice, if you're not using
NVidia controllers - there's a bug in either the drives or the
controllers that makes them drop drives fairly frequently.
Do you happen to have more details about this problem? Or some
pointers?
Thanks -- Volker
--
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Joel Buckley joel.buck...@sun.com wrote:
How much is your time worth?
Quite a bit.
Consider the engineering effort going into every Sun Server.
Any system from Sun is more than sufficient for a home server.
You want more disks, then buy one with more slots.
To: Joel Buckley joel.buck...@sun.com
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Peter Korn peter.k...@sun.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Joel Buckley joel.buck...@sun.com wrote:
How much is your time worth
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Joel Buckley joel.buck...@sun.com wrote:
How much is your time worth?
Quite a bit.
Consider the engineering effort going into every Sun Server.
Any system from Sun is more than sufficient
!
- Original Message -
From: Scott Laird sc...@sigkill.org
To: Brandon High bh...@freaks.com
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org; Peter Korn peter.k...@sun.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + OpenSolaris for home NAS?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Brandon High
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:43 PM, JZ j...@excelsioritsolutions.com wrote:
ok, Scott, that sounded sincere. I am not going to do the pic thing on you.
But do I have to spell this out to you -- somethings are invented not for
home use?
Yeah, I'm sincere, but I've ordered more or less the same
ah == Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ah If you want a small system that is pre-built, look at every
ah possible permutation/combination of the Dell Vostro 200 box.
I guess Dell is backing out of this and a few other flashy bargains:
If you want a small system that is pre-built, look at
every possible
permutation/combination of the Dell Vostro 200 box.
I agree, the Vostro 200 systems are an excellent deal. Update to the latest
BIOS and they will recognize 8GB of RAM.
The ONE problem with them, is that Dell does not
OpenSolaris + ZFS achieves 120MB/sec read speed with 4 SATA 7200 rpm discs.
440 MB/Sec read speed with 7 SATA discs. 220MB/sec write speed.
2GB/sec write speed with 48 discs (on SUN Thumper x4600).
I have links to websites were Ive read this.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I had a problem like that on my laptop that also has an rge interface, ping
worked fine, but ssh and ftp didn't. To get around it I had to add
set ip:dohwcksum = 0
to /etc/system and reboot.
That worked and is worth a try for you :)
Cheers,
Alan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Since you are using the rge driver, you might be getting bit by CR6686415.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6686415
The symptoms are that some packets work, more likely with small packets
like pings, but large packets might not work. I've also had trouble not
being
able to talk to
wow, well done peeps, that was the problem! Request to re-number that bug to
666. Totally evil, and what a waste of time that has caused. Anyway, I have
internet access from the box, which allowed me to easily install SMB which
after a bit of messing around has now allowed me to access the
Just as a follow up. I went ahead with the original hardware purchase, it was
so much cheaper than the alternatives it was hard to resist.
Anyway, OS 2008-05 installed very nicely. Although it mentions 32bit while
booting, so I need to investigate that at some point. The actual hardware
pb == Peter Bridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
pb I really need a step-by-step 'how to' to access this box from
pb my OSX Leopard
What you need for NFS on a laptop is a good automount daemon and a
'umount -f' command that actually does what the man page claims.
The automounter in Leopard
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
AMD Athelon/Opteron dual core likely matches or exceeds
Intel quad core for ZFS use due to a less bottlenecked memory channel.
How big is the difference? Does anyone have benchmarking results (maybe even
when using ZFS on Solaris 10)?
Martti
Out of interest, and reasonably on-topic, can anyone predict
performance comparison (CIFS) between these two setups?
1) Dedicated Windows 2003 Server, Intel hardware SATA RAID controller
(single raid 5 array, 8 disks)
2) OpenSolaris+ZFS+CIFS, 8 drives with a SuperMicro controller
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Martti Kuparinen wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
AMD Athelon/Opteron dual core likely matches or exceeds
Intel quad core for ZFS use due to a less bottlenecked memory channel.
How big is the difference? Does anyone have benchmarking results (maybe even
when using ZFS on
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Martti Kuparinen wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
AMD Athelon/Opteron dual core likely matches or exceeds
Intel quad core for ZFS use due to a less bottlenecked memory channel.
How big is the
Al Hopper wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Martti Kuparinen wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
AMD Athelon/Opteron dual core likely matches or exceeds
Intel quad core for ZFS use due to a less bottlenecked
ECC?
$60 unbuffered 4GB 800MHz DDR2 ECC CL5 DIMM (Kit Of 2)
http://www.provantage.com/kingston-technology-kvr800d2e5k2-4g~7KIN90H4.htm
for Intel 32x0 north bridge like
http://www.provantage.com/supermicro-x7sbe~7SUPM11K.htm
___
zfs-discuss mailing
Rob Logan wrote:
ECC?
$60 unbuffered 4GB 800MHz DDR2 ECC CL5 DIMM (Kit Of 2)
http://www.provantage.com/kingston-technology-kvr800d2e5k2-4g~7KIN90H4.htm
Geez, I have to move to the US for cheap hardware. I've paid 120€ for
exactly that 4GB ECC kit (well, I bought two of these, so 240€) in
You have not described your requirements (low-power ??, low-cost ??).
But I'll contribute some pointers anyway! :)
Well for a home NAS I'm looking at noise as a big factor. Also for a 24x7 box,
power consumption, that's why the northbridge is putting me off slightly.
So far the other solutions
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Peter Bridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well for a home NAS I'm looking at noise as a big factor. Also for a 24x7
box, power consumption, that's why the northbridge is putting me off slightly.
That's why I built a full-sized tower using a Lian-Li case with
Same case and same idea :) I have 2 dampered drives already installed from a
previous project. Another 2 I pulled out to install into a qnap 209. Ideally
I'd return the disks and replace the qnap with this new single ZFS NAS,
although I'm quite fond of the qnap bt client, and can't use all
I just built a homeserver that pulls 62 watts from the plug at idle for
~$700. I had some of the parts lying around but even if you bought
everything at frys you should be able to set yourself up for under 1K for
the next 3-5 years.
Seasonic 80 plus 300 watt power supply
Intel DP35DP motherboard
For those of you who wants to build a NAS, this is mandatory reading I think.
Read all comments too.
http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/
I use a P45 mobo, Intel Q9450, ATI4850 and 4 GB RAM. AOC SATA card with 8 Sata
slots. 4 Samsung 500GB drives. Works excellent in a
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Peter Bridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking to buy some new hardware to build a home ZFS based NAS. I know
ZFS can be quite CPU/mem hungry and I'd appreciate some opinions on the
following combination:
Intel Essential Series D945GCLF2
Kingston
thanks for all the feedback. Some followup questions:
If OS will see all 4 cores, will it also make use of all 4 cores for ZFS. ie is
ZFS fully multi threaded?
Is there any point to run ZFS over just two 2 disks? without the extra sata
ports I'm thinking I may have to abandon this idea. The
oops, I mean 2 cores.
Anyway I'm having second thoughts about this board now because the northbridge
sounds like a power hog and I was planning a passive cooled system. Also I
went through the hardware compatability list and can see what was mentioned
about the lack of SATA card for PCI. So
Nvidia 5 series for amd - got good support for the chipset
Intel boards - as ICH9 drivers are in
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I'm looking to buy some new hardware to build a home ZFS based NAS. I know ZFS
can be quite CPU/mem hungry and I'd appreciate some opinions on the following
combination:
Intel Essential Series D945GCLF2
Kingston ValueRAM DIMM 2GB PC2-5300U CL5 (DDR2-667) (KVR667D2N5/2G)
Firstly, does it sound
I'm running ZFS on nevada (b94 and b98) on two machines at home, both
with 4 gig ram. one has a quad core intel core2 w/ ECC ram, the other
has normal RAM and an athlon 64 dual-core low power. both seem to be
working great.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Peter Bridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It depends on what your doing.
I got a AMD Sempron Processor LE-1100 (1.9Ghz) doing NAS for mythtv and seems
to do ok.
If the board you quote is what your getting I think it is 64bit chip - intel
site says its a Atom 330.
Solaris will should use all its cores/threads - intel have added a load
I've been looking at this board myself for the same thing
The blog below is regarding the D945GCLF but looking at the two, it looks like
the
processor is the only thing that is different (single core vs. dual core).
http://blogs.sun.com/PotstickerGuru/entry/solaris_running_on_intel_atom
--
62 matches
Mail list logo
