However, I've one more question - do you guys think NCQ with short
stroked zones help or hurt performance? I have this feeling (my
gut, that is), that at a low queue depth it's a Great Win, whereas
at a deeper queue it would degrade performance more so than without
it. Any
Thank you for your quick responses! I was unable to get back to this thread on
account of being stuck on a motorcycle yesterday (still can't feel my legs!).
I think the KISS principle applies to 95% of computing (keeping in mind that
90% of everything is crap ;)). I've read Relling's blogs
Scott Lovenberg wrote:
First Post!
Sorry, I had to get that out of the way to break the ice...
Welcome!
I was wondering if it makes sense to zone ZFS pools by disk slice, and if it
makes a difference with RAIDZ. As I'm sure we're all aware, the end of a
drive is half as fast as the
First Post!
Sorry, I had to get that out of the way to break the ice...
I was wondering if it makes sense to zone ZFS pools by disk slice, and if it
makes a difference with RAIDZ. As I'm sure we're all aware, the end of a drive
is half as fast as the beginning ([i]where the zoning stipulates
[...] ZFS gives me the ability to snapshot to archive (I assume it
works across pools?).
No. Snapshots are only within a pool. Pools are independent storage
arenas.
--
Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant TAOS
