Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs upgrade freezes desktop

2009-12-30 Thread roland
seems, my problem is unrelated. after disabling the gui and working console only, i see no freezes. so it must be a problem of the desktop/X environment and not kernel/zfs issue. sorry for the noise. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zfs upgrade freezes desktop

2009-12-29 Thread roland
i have a problem which is perhaps related. i installed opensolaris snv_130. after adding 4 additional disks and creating a raidz on them with compression=gzip and dedup enabled, i got reproducable system freeze (not sure, but the desktop/mouse-coursor froze) directly after login - without

[zfs-discuss] Zfs upgrade freezes desktop

2009-12-18 Thread David Hollenberg
On snv_129, a zfs upgrade (*not* a zpool upgrade) from version 3 to version 4 caused the desktop to freeze - no response to keyboard or mouse events and clock not updated. ermine% uname -a SunOS ermine 5.11 snv_129 i86pc i386 i86pc ermine% zpool upgrade This system is currently running ZFS

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-20 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 17:25 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: I would think the average person would want to have access to 1000s of DVDs / CDs within a small box versus taking up the full wall. This is already being done now, and most of the companies doing it are

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Toby Thain wrote: On 17-Apr-07, at 8:33 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Rayson, Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 10:50:41 AM, you wrote: RH On 4/17/07, David R. Litwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about asking Microsoft to change Shared Source first?? Let's leave

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Rich Teer
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Toby Thain wrote: The killer feature for me is checksumming and self-healing. Same here. I think anyone who dismisses ZFS as being inappropriate for desktop use (who needs access to Petabytes of space in their desktop machine?!) doesn't get it. (A close 2nd for me

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Toby Thain
On 17-Apr-07, at 12:15 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Toby Thain wrote: On 17-Apr-07, at 8:33 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: ... I belive that ZFS definitely belongs on a desktop, Apple (and I) assuredly agree with you. I would agree as well. With

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Apr 17, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Toby Thain wrote: On 17-Apr-07, at 12:15 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Toby Thain wrote: On 17-Apr-07, at 8:33 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: ... I belive that ZFS definitely belongs on a desktop, Apple (and I)

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Rayson Ho
On 4/17/07, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here. I think anyone who dismisses ZFS as being inappropriate for desktop use (who needs access to Petabytes of space in their desktop machine?!) doesn't get it. Well, for many of those who find it hard to upgrade Windows, I guess you will

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Toby Thain
On 17-Apr-07, at 1:08 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: On Apr 17, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Toby Thain wrote: On 17-Apr-07, at 12:15 PM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: On Apr 17, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Toby Thain wrote: On 17-Apr-07, at 8:33 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: ... I belive

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Toby Thain
On 17-Apr-07, at 1:24 PM, Rayson Ho wrote: On 4/17/07, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same here. I think anyone who dismisses ZFS as being inappropriate for desktop use (who needs access to Petabytes of space in their desktop machine?!) doesn't get it. Well, for many of those who

[zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Toby Thain
On 17-Apr-07, at 8:33 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Rayson, Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 10:50:41 AM, you wrote: RH On 4/17/07, David R. Litwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about asking Microsoft to change Shared Source first?? Let's leave ms out of this, eh? :-) RH While ZFS is nice, I

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:00:00PM -0400, Rayson Ho wrote: Apple is integrating DTrace too, and yet I don't see more than 10% of the Mac users writing D programs. But 100% of MacOS users might end up using DTrace without knowing it. ___ zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Toby Thain
On 17-Apr-07, at 2:00 PM, Rayson Ho wrote: On 4/17/07, Toby Thain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OS X tends to effectively elide the book larning part of using UNIX. I don't think ZFS would be any exception - they won't ship until you don't even know it's there. But then, I have helped people

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Erblichs
Rich Teer, I have a perfect app for the masses. A Hi-Def Video/ audio server for the hi-def TV and audio setup. I would think the average person would want to have access to 1000s of DVDs / CDs within a small box versus taking up the

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Shawn Walker
On 18/04/07, Erblichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rich Teer, I have a perfect app for the masses. A Hi-Def Video/ audio server for the hi-def TV and audio setup. I would think the average person would want to have access to 1000s of DVDs / CDs within

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on the desktop

2007-04-17 Thread Ian Collins
Shawn Walker wrote: On 18/04/07, Erblichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rich Teer, I have a perfect app for the masses. A Hi-Def Video/ audio server for the hi-def TV and audio setup. I would think the average person would want to have access to