Hello all,
If you have copies=2 on a large enough raid-z(2) pool and 2(3) disks
die, is it possible to recover that information despite the offline
state of the pool?
I don't have this happening to me, it's just a theoretical question.
So, if you can't recover the data, is there any advantage to
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette wrote:
Hello all,
If you have copies=2 on a large enough raid-z(2) pool and 2(3) disks
die, is it possible to recover that information despite the offline
state of the pool?
I don't have this happening to me, it's just a theoretical question.
So, if you can't recover
bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 8/07 s10x_u4wos_12b X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 16 August 2007
(with all the latest patches)
On 22 January, 2008 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent me these 1,6K bytes:
bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 8/07 s10x_u4wos_12b X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Richard Elling wrote:
It all depends on the configuration. For a single disk system, copies
should generally be faster than mirroring. For multiple disks, the
performance should be similar as copies are spread out over different
disks.
Here's a crazy idea: could we use zfs on dvd for s/w
On 24-May-07, at 6:26 AM, Henk Langeveld wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
It all depends on the configuration. For a single disk system,
copies
should generally be faster than mirroring. For multiple disks, the
performance should be similar as copies are spread out over different
disks.
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 1:48:23 AM, you wrote:
RE Yes, PSARC 2007/121 integrated into build 61 (and there was much rejoicing
:-)
RE I'm working on some models which will show the affect on various RAID
RE configurations and intend to post some results soon. Suffice to say, if
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 1:48:23 AM, you wrote:
RE Yes, PSARC 2007/121 integrated into build 61 (and there was much rejoicing
:-)
RE I'm working on some models which will show the affect on various RAID
RE configurations and intend to post some results
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 6:23:05 PM, you wrote:
RE Robert Milkowski wrote:
RE Wouldn't that fall under the generic rewrite/shrink functionality we're also
RE anxiously waiting for? Note that this also brings up a nasty edge case
where
RE the rewrite may cause you to run out
Hello zfs-discuss,
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6459491
I guess some people here will be happy :)
ps. now think about all these questions: what do you think about HW
RAID5 LUNs with raidz2 on top of this with ditto block set to 3? Or
maybe 2 would be
Yes, PSARC 2007/121 integrated into build 61 (and there was much rejoicing :-)
I'm working on some models which will show the affect on various RAID
configurations and intend to post some results soon. Suffice to say, if
you have a stripe with 1 disk, you might be able to survive loss of a
11 matches
Mail list logo
