Bill Moore wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:25:21PM +0200, michael schuster wrote:
maybe a stupid question: what do we use for compressing dump data on the
dump device?
We use a variant of Lempel-Ziv called lzjb (the jb is for Jeff Bonwick).
The algorithm was designed for very small
Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:53:09PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
Is someone actually working on it? Or any other algorithms?
Any dates?
Not that I know of. Any volunteers? :-)
(Actually, I think that a RLE compression algorithm for metadata is
Hello zfs-discuss,
Is someone actually working on it? Or any other algorithms?
Any dates?
--
Best regards,
Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
zfs-discuss
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:53:09PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
Is someone actually working on it? Or any other algorithms?
Any dates?
Not that I know of. Any volunteers? :-)
(Actually, I think that a RLE compression algorithm for metadata is a
higher priority, but
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:00:32AM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
(Actually, I think that a RLE compression algorithm for metadata is a
higher priority, but if someone from the community wants to step up, we
won't turn your code away!)
Is RLE likely to be more efficient for metadata? Have you
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:28:10AM -0700, Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:00:32AM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
(Actually, I think that a RLE compression algorithm for metadata is a
higher priority, but if someone from the community wants to step up, we
won't turn your code
