Why are you sending from s1? If you've already sent that, the logical thing to
do is send from s3 the next time.
If you really do need to send from the start every time, you can do that with
the -f option on zfs receive, to force it to overwrite newer changes, but you
are going to be sending
Ross wrote:
[context, please!]
Why are you sending from s1? If you've already sent that, the logical thing to
do is send from s3 the next time.
If you really do need to send from the start every time, you can do that with
the -f option on zfs receive, to force it to overwrite newer changes,
Hi there,
While receiving incremental streams, zfs recv ignores the existing
snapshots and stops without processing rest of the streams.
Here is the scenario.
# zfs snapshot sp...@s1
# zfs send sp...@s1 | zfs recv dpath
# zfs snapshot sp...@s2
# zfs snapshot sp...@s3
# zfs send -I sp...@s1
Raghav Ilavarasu wrote:
Hi there,
While receiving incremental streams, zfs recv ignores the existing
snapshots and stops without processing rest of the streams.
Here is the scenario.
# zfs snapshot sp...@s1
# zfs send sp...@s1 | zfs recv dpath
# zfs snapshot sp...@s2
# zfs snapshot
