I've an EX-3403 Marvell 88SX6081 Controller.
Unfortunately it is revision 07 which seems to be not supported until now.
I don't see any disks ... :-(
This is already discussed here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=13533
This message posted from opensolaris.org
So what are your concerns here? Correctness or
performance?
It is not about correctness.
In journaling filesystems, builders seems to pick either
recover all filesystem transactions up to the point of
crash or you may lose last few transactions, or
make it an option (e.g. VxFS delayed log).
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 08:17:41 -0700
From: Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Harold Ancell wrote:
At 04:41 AM 5/5/2007, Christian Rost wrote:
For what and when to buy, I observe two things: at some point you
HAVE to buy something; with disks exceeding Moores Law (aren't
they
After reading through the ZFS slides, it appears to be the case that
if ZFS wants to modify a single data block, if must rewrite every
block between that modified block and the uberblock (root of the tree).
Is this really the case? If so, does this mean that every commit
operation (ie every
Adam Megacz wrote:
After reading through the ZFS slides, it appears to be the case that
if ZFS wants to modify a single data block, if must rewrite every
block between that modified block and the uberblock (root of the tree).
Is this really the case?
That is true when commiting the
Adam Megacz wrote:
Ah, okay. The slides I read said that in ZFS there is no journal --
not needed (slide #9):
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfs_last.pdf
I guess the slides are out of date in light of the ZFS Intent Log
journal?
Yes , I can understand your confusion.
