Anton B. Rang rang at acm.org writes:
Be careful of changing the Max_Payload_Size parameter. It needs to match,
and be supported, between all PCI-E components which might communicate with
each other. You can tell what values are supported by reading the Device
Capabilities Register and
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:33:57AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
E.g., how would one mimic:
Hi,
I am (hoping) to present a paper at osdevcon in Prague in June. I have
a draft of the paper and
am looking for a couple of people to review it. I am interested to know
the following:
1. Is it understandable?
2. Is it technically correct?
3. Any comments/suggestions to make it better?
The
I have a a problem with zpool import after having
problems with 2 disks in RAID 5 (hardware raid). There are some bad blocks on
that disks.
#zpool import
..
state: FAULTED
status: The pool metadata is corrupted.
..
#zdb -l /dev/rdsk/c4t600C0FF009258F4855B59001d0s0
is OK.
I managed
Balaji Kutty wrote:
Chris Kirby wrote:
Balaji Kutty wrote:
Hi,
I want to disable extended attributes in my zfs on s10u4. I found out
that the command to do is zfs set xattr=off poolname. But, I do not
see this option in s10u4.
This RFE (6351954) appears to have been integrated into s10u4.
I would like advise about how to replace a raid 0 lun. The lun is basically a
raid 0 lun which is from a single disk volume group / volume from our Flexline
380 unit. So every disk in the unit is a volume group/volume/lun mapped to the
host. We then let ZFS do the raid.
We have a lun now
Jens Elkner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:33:57AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
I'm currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user
home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba.
Why not the in kernel CIFS server ?
E.g.,
Addtional information:
It looks like perhaps the original drive is in use, and the hot spare is
assigned but not in use see below about zpool iostat:
raidz22.76T 4.49T 0 0 29.0K 18.4K
c10t600A0B80001139967CF945E80E95d0 - - 0
David,
Try detaching the spare, like this:
# zpool detach pool-name c10t600A0B80001139967CE145E80D4Dd0
Cindy
David Smith wrote:
Addtional information:
It looks like perhaps the original drive is in use, and the hot spare is
assigned but not in use see below about zpool iostat:
Yes! That worked to get the spare back to an available state. Thanks!
So that leaves me with the trying to put together a recommended procedure to
replace a failed lun/disk from our Flexline 380. Does anyone have
configuration in
which they are using a RAID 0 lun, which they need to
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a similar backup program
for zfs? Or a general tape management program that can take data from
a stream and split it
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a similar backup program
for zfs? Or a general tape management program
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a similar backup
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Jens Elkner wrote:
We already lost this functionality with the introduction of the NFSv4
ACL crap on ZFS and earned a lot of hate you feedbacks.
I was actually looking forward to ZFS ACLs, as they should have been much
more compatible with Samba/Windows clients.
Carson Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single tape?
ufsdump handles this quite nicely. Is there a
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, March 14, 2008, 9:48:47 PM, you wrote:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is larger than what can fit on a single
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
this behavior is only possible from a Windows client. When creating
files from unix the POSIX rules apply and the requestors mode must be
honored, which results in the owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries
always being set
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, March 14, 2008, 9:48:47 PM, you wrote:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bill Shannon wrote:
What's the best way to backup a zfs filesystem to tape, where the size
of the filesystem is
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
That is not correct. The deny entries are necessary for POSIX semantics.
In POSIX are only allowed to pick up permissions from the owner, group or
other class. You can't pick up part of the permissions you are looking
for from the group class and
I just wanted to follow up on this issue I raised a few weeks ago.
With help from several of you, I had all the information and tools
I needed to start debugging my problem. Which of course meant that
my problem disappeared!
At one point my theory was that ksh93 was updating my .history file
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
That is not correct. The deny entries are necessary for POSIX semantics.
In POSIX are only allowed to pick up permissions from the owner, group or
other class. You can't pick up part of the permissions you are looking
for
Hi all,
We need to move about 1T of data from one zpool on EMC dmx-3000 to another
storage device (dmx-3). DMX-3 can be visible on the same host where dmx-3000 is
being used on or from another host.
What is the best way to transfer the data from dmx-3000 to dmx-3?
Is it possible to add the new
Vahid,
We need to move about 1T of data from one zpool on EMC dmx-3000 to
another storage device (dmx-3). DMX-3 can be visible on the same
host where dmx-3000 is being used on or from another host.
What is the best way to transfer the data from dmx-3000 to dmx-3?
Is it possible to add
Thanks for your reply Jim,
The current pool is consist of a few EMC LUNs and we are moving the entire pool
to the new EMC storage with different devices.
What would be my old or new device? Here is some parts of zpool status:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rd_01 ONLINE 0 0 0
Simple enough thanks. I assume as I start the zpool replace operation, the
original LUNs will not be in rd_01 pool any more.
Not that will do that, but theoretically I can perform this on a live machine
without interruption, is that right?
Thank you,
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 3/14/08, Vahid Moghaddasi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
replace your LUNs one at a time:
zpool replace -f rd_01 c4t6006048187870150525244353543d0
first_lun_off_dmx-3
zpool replace -f rd_01
26 matches
Mail list logo
