Is there a ZFS equivalent of ufsdump and ufsrestore?
Will creating a tar file work with ZFS? We are trying to backup a
ZFS file system to a separate disk, and would like to take advantage of
something like ufsdump rather than using expensive backup software.
Thanks for any
Poulos, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a ZFS equivalent of ufsdump and ufsrestore?
Will creating a tar file work with ZFS? We are trying to backup a
ZFS file system to a separate disk, and would like to take advantage of
something like ufsdump rather than using expensive
I've installed SXDE (snv_89) and found that the web console only listens on
https://localhost:6789/ now, and the module for ZFS admin doesn't work.
When I open the link, the left frame lists a stacktrace (below) and the right
frame is plain empty. Any suggestions?
I tried substituting
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Poulos, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a ZFS equivalent of ufsdump and ufsrestore?
Will creating a tar file work with ZFS? We are trying to backup a
ZFS file system to a separate disk, and would like to take advantage of
something like ufsdump
We have a test machine installed with a ZFS root (snv_77/x86 and
rootpol/rootfs with grub support).
Recently tried to update it to snv_89 which (in Flag Days list) claimed more
support for ZFS boot roots, but the installer disk didn't find any previously
installed operating system to upgrade.
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The closest equivalent to ufsdump and ufsrestore is star.
I very strongly disagree. The closest ZFS equivalent to ufsdump is 'zfs
send'. 'zfs send' like ufsdump has initmiate awareness of the the
actual on disk layout and is an integrated part of
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The closest equivalent to ufsdump and ufsrestore is star.
I very strongly disagree. The closest ZFS equivalent to ufsdump is 'zfs
send'. 'zfs send' like ufsdump has initmiate awareness of the the
actual on disk layout and
Darren J Moffat schrieb:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Poulos, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a ZFS equivalent of ufsdump and ufsrestore?
Will creating a tar file work with ZFS? We are trying to backup a
ZFS file system to a separate disk, and would like to take advantage of
The important thing is to protect your data. You have lots of options here,
so we'd need to know more precisely what the other requirements are before
we could give better advice.
-- richard
Please let me come in with a parallel need, the answer to which should
contribute to this thread.
On May 29, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
I've installed SXDE (snv_89) and found that the web console only
listens on https://localhost:6789/ now, and the module for ZFS admin
doesn't work.
It works for out of the box without any special mojo. In order to get
the webconsole to
On 29 May 2008, at 15:51, Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
I very strongly disagree. The closest ZFS equivalent to ufsdump is
'zfs
send'. 'zfs send' like ufsdump has initmiate awareness of the the
actual on disk layout and is an integrated part of the filesystem
implementation.
star is a
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:01:36PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 05:11, James Andrewartha wrote:
That's not a huge price difference when building a server - thanks
for the pointer. Are there any 'gotchas' the list can offer when
using a SAS card with SATA drives?
| I very strongly disagree. The closest ZFS equivalent to ufsdump is
| 'zfs send'. 'zfs send' like ufsdump has initmiate awareness of the
| the actual on disk layout and is an integrated part of the filesystem
| implementation.
I must strongly disagree in turn, at least for Solaris 10. 'zfs
Hi list,
I'd recommend using zfs send /receive and use a secondary machine that
keeps the received filesystems in a backup pool.
This gives you the advantage of being able to scrub your backups.
I'd like to add another question: Is there a way to efficiently
replicating a complete zfs-pool
Hello...
If i have understood well, you will have a host with EMC RAID5 discs. Is that
right?
You pay a lot of money to have EMC discs, and i think is not a good idea have
another layer of *any* RAID on top of it. If you have EMC RAID5 (eg.
symmetrix), you don't need to have a software
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 07:07 -0700, Jim Klimov wrote:
We have a test machine installed with a ZFS root (snv_77/x86 and
rootpol/rootfs with grub support).
Recently tried to update it to snv_89 which (in Flag Days list) claimed more
support for ZFS boot roots, but the installer disk didn't
Not sure where to put this but I am cc'ing the ZFS - discussion board.
I was successfull in creating iscsi shares using ZFS set shareiscsi=on with 2
thin provisioned partitions of 1TB each (zfs create -s -V 1tb idrive/d1).
Access to the shares with an iscsi initiator was successful, all was
On 29 May 2008, at 17:52, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
The first issue alone makes 'zfs send' completely unsuitable for the
purposes that we currently use ufsdump. I don't believe that we've
lost
a complete filesystem in years, but we restore accidentally deleted
files all the time. (And
Hi,
I create a pool mirrored with 1gb of space. After I create a file system in
that pool and put a file (file1) of 300MB it that file system. After that, I
create a snapshot in the file system. With the zfs list command the space used
by the snapshot is 0 (zero). It´s ok.
Well after that I
Tano wrote:
Not sure where to put this but I am cc'ing the ZFS - discussion board.
I was successfull in creating iscsi shares using ZFS set shareiscsi=on
with 2 thin provisioned partitions of 1TB each (zfs create -s -V 1tb
idrive/d1). Access to the shares with an iscsi initiator was
Wow -- I had seen Joe Little's blog about i-ram and slog and was using it that
way, and mine just failed also.
I'm not at the point he is with data loss, but I've booted the OS 2008.05
livecd and I can see all the disks (minus the log) in an zpool import.
Please, Please, Please, tell me there
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jeb Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meant to add that zpool import -f pool doesn't work b/c of the missing log
vdev.
All the other disks are there and show up with zpool import, but it won't
import.
Is there anyway a util could clear the log device vdev
I've had a RAIDZ/ZFS File Server since Update 2, so I thought I'd share my
setup.
Opteron FX-51 (2.3Ghz, Socket 939)
Asus SK8N
4x 512MB EBB Unbuffered DDR1 Memory
2x Skymaster PCI-X 4 Port SATA (based on SI3114 Chipset). currently deployed
over 2x PCI ports on the motherboard.
1x Intel 10/100
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Joe Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jeb Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meant to add that zpool import -f pool doesn't work b/c of the missing log
vdev.
All the other disks are there and show up with zpool import, but it
24 matches
Mail list logo
