___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Christopher Gibbs
Email / LDAP Administrator
Web Integration Programming
Abilene Christian University
driver?
On 5/21/07, Carson Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Gibbs wrote:
XIU, I'm currently using that card with my modest three-disk raid-z
home server and it works great! Solaris 10 had native support for it
so no need to mess with drivers.
By native support, I assume you mean IDE
@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Christopher Gibbs
Email / LDAP Administrator
Web Integration Programming
Abilene Christian University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
/6/07, Christopher Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No idea... mine are all 250GB and the only thing I could find on it is
this blurb from their product description:
Breaks the 137GB barrier! Supports various brands of large capacity
Serial ATA hard disk drives
http://siig.com/ViewProduct.aspx?pid
-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Christopher Gibbs
Email / LDAP Administrator
Web Integration Programming
Abilene Christian University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
I suspect it's probably not a good idea but I was wondering if someone
could clarify the details.
I have 4 250G SATA(150) disks and 1 250G PATA(133) disk. Would it
cause problems if I created a raidz1 pool across all 5 drives?
I know the PATA drive is slower so would it slow the access across
, 2007 at 01:22:40PM -0500, Christopher Gibbs wrote:
Anyone?
On 9/14/07, Christopher Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect it's probably not a good idea but I was wondering if someone
could clarify the details.
I have 4 250G SATA(150) disks and 1 250G PATA(133) disk. Would
/SnapshotAlbum/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
--
Christopher Gibbs
Email / LDAP Administrator
I have a hot spare that was part of my zpool but is no longer
connected to the system. I can run the zpool remove command and it
returns fine but doesn't seem to do anything.
I have tried adding and removing spares that are connected to the
system and works properly. Is zpool remove failing
It should be there... try starting the webconsole service.
On 2/14/08, Tim Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I just loaded up opensolaris on an X4500 (Thumper) and tried to connect to
the ZFS GUI (https://x:6789)...and it is not there.
Is this not part of Open Solaris...or do I just
By default the webconsole only listens locally but it looks like
you've already set it to listen to external TCP requests.
Whenever I've changed this property I had to do a full disable and
then enable for the change to take effect. Might be worth a try. : )
On 2/14/08, Michael Schuster [EMAIL
:
$ sudo zpool import -f tank
cannot import 'tank': invalid vdev configuration
I'm using: Solaris Express Developer Edition 1/08 snv_79b X86
Any ideas?
--
Christopher Gibbs
Programmer / Analyst
Web Integration Programming
Abilene Christian University
was functioning perfectly before the restart. There's also a
spare attached to the pool that's not showing here.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Christopher Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So just as the subject says, I replaced a failed disk. Resilver
completed successfully and everything was fine
PM, Rob Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's also a spare attached to the pool that's not showing here.
can you make it show?
Rob
--
Christopher Gibbs
Programmer / Analyst
Web Integration Programming
Abilene Christian University
.
Rob
--
Christopher Gibbs
Programmer / Analyst
Web Integration Programming
Abilene Christian University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Christopher Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I get back:
$ sudo zdb -e tank
zdb: can't open tank: Invalid argument
tank is the name of my pool. I tried a bogus name and get this back:
$ sudo zdb -e tank2
Assertion failed: nvlist_lookup_string(config
33.5K 59.5M31 0 653K 0 0 0 0
/tmp/t/3 42.5K 59.5M41 0 650K 0 0 0 0
--
Christopher Gibbs
Programmer / Analyst
Web Integration Programming
Abilene Christian University
___
zfs-discuss
, should I go with the OpenSolaris (.com) release
instead? Also, is there one that has better/newer driver support?
(Mostly in relation to SATA controllers)
Not sure if this is the right place to post this but since my main
goal is a ZFS server then I should get your guys opinions.
--
Christopher Gibbs
for me to date).
--Tim
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Christopher Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Pretty much what the subject says. I'm wondering which platform will
have the best stability/performance for a ZFS file server.
I've been using Solaris Express builds of Nevada for quite
19 matches
Mail list logo
