On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Eric Schrock wrote:
The original reasoning was that we didn't have enough time to validate
the behavior of the zone upgrade tools with ZFS as the root filesystem,
particularly as these tools (Ashanti, Zulu) are a moving target.
Upon closer inspection, we found that this
Howdy,
We use VxVM quite a bit at my place of employment, and are extremely
interested in moving to ZFS to reduce complexity and costs. One useful
feature that is in VxVM that doesn't seem to be in ZFS is the ability to
migrate vdevs between pools. This is extremely useful when you want to
On 10/31/06, Wes Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so now that I'm planning to build my NAS using ZFS, I now need to devise
or
learn of a preexisting method to receive notification of ZFS handled errors on a
remote machine.
For example, if a disk fails and I don't regularly login or
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Adam Leventhal wrote:
Rick McNeal and I have been working on building support for sharing ZVOLs
as iSCSI targets directly into ZFS. Below is the proposal I'll be
submitting to PSARC. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Adam
---8---
iSCSI/ZFS Integration
A. Overview
Howdy,
We bumped into the issues described in bug #6456888 on one of our production
systems, and I was curious if any progress has been made on this bug? Are there
any workarounds available for this issue (the work around section in the bug is
empty)?
Thanks,
- Ryan
--
UNIX Administrator
Howdy,
On one of my Solaris 10 11/06 servers, I am getting numerous errors
similar to the following:
Feb 11 09:30:23 rx scsi: WARNING: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],2000/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0 (sd1):
Feb 11 09:30:23 rx Error for Command: write(10)
Error Level: Retryable
Feb 11
On 2/11/07, Robert Milkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Matty,
Sunday, February 11, 2007, 6:56:14 PM, you wrote:
M Howdy,
M On one of my Solaris 10 11/06 servers, I am getting numerous errors
M similar to the following:
AFAIK nothing was integrated yet to do it.
Hot Spare will kick
Howdy,
I have seen a number of folks run into issues due to ZFS file system
fragmentation, and was curious if anyone on team ZFS is working on
this issue? Would it be possible to share with the list any changes
that will be made to to help address fragmentation problems?
Thanks,
- Ryan
--
UNIX
On 2/26/07, cedric briner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I'm trying to consolidate my HDs in a cheap but (I hope) reliable
manner. To do so, I was thinking to use zfs over iscsi.
Unfortunately, I'm having some issue with it, when I do:
# iscsi server (nexenta alpha 5)
#
svcadm
On 3/11/07, Robert Milkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IW Got it, thanks, and a more general question, in a single disk
IW root pool scenario, what advantage zfs will provide over ufs w/
IW logging? And when zfs boot integrated in neveda, will live upgrade work with
zfs root?
Snapshots/clones
On 3/11/07, Lin Ling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matty wrote:
I am curious how snapshots and clones will be integrated with grub.
Will it be posible to boot from a snapshot? I think this would be
useful when applying patches, since you could snapshot / ,/var and
/opt, patch the system
Howdy,
This is awesome news that ZFS boot support is available for x86
platforms. Do any of the ZFS developers happen to know when ZFS boot
support for SPARC will be available?
Thanks,
- Ryan
--
UNIX Administrator
http://prefetch.net
___
zfs-discuss
On 4/19/07, Mark J Musante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Mario Goebbels wrote:
Is it possible to gracefully and permanently remove a vdev from a pool
without data loss?
Is this what you're looking for?
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=4852783
If so, the
On 4/20/07, George Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a high priority for us and is actively being worked.
Vague enough for you. :-) Sorry I can't give you anything more exact
that that.
Hi George,
If ZFS is supposed to be part of opensolaris, then why can't the
community get additional
On 5/4/07, Roch - PAE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manoj Joseph writes:
Hi,
I was wondering about the ARC and its interaction with the VM
pagecache... When a file on a ZFS filesystem is mmaped, does the ARC
cache get mapped to the process' virtual memory? Or is there another copy?
My
On 5/31/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you are doing iSCSI and may not be running ZFS on the initiator
(client) then I highly recommend that you run with IPsec using at least
AH (or ESP with Authentication) to protect the transport. Don't assume
that your network is
Are there any plans to support record sizes larger than 128k? We use
ZFS file systems for disk staging on our backup servers (compression
is a nice feature here), and we typically configure the disk staging
process to read and write large blocks (typically 1MB or so). This
reduces the number of
On 9/12/07, Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Striping several disks together with a stripe width that is tuned for your
data
model is how you could get your performance up. Stripping has been left out
of the ZFS model for some reason. Where it is true that RAIDZ will stripe
the data
One of our Solaris 10 update 3 servers paniced today with the following error:
Sep 18 00:34:53 m2000ef savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after
panic: assertion failed: ss != NULL, file:
../../common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 125
The server saved a core file, and the resulting backtrace is
On 9/18/07, Larry Wake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matty wrote:
George Wilson put together a list of ZFS enhancements and bug fixes
that were integrated into Solaris 10 update 3, and I was curious if
there was something similar for update 4? There have been a bunch of
reliability
On 9/18/07, Neil Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Separate log devices (slogs) didn't make it into S10U4 but will be in U5.
This is awesome! Will the SYNC_NV support that was integrated this
week be added to update 5 as well? That would be super useful,
assuming the major arrays vendors support
Howdy,
We are running zones on a number of Solaris 10 update 3 hosts, and we
are bumping into an issue where the kernel doesn't clean up
connections after an application exits. When this issue occurs, the
netstat utility doesn't show anything listening on the port the
application uses (8080 in
On 10/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any collateral that I could share with a prospective customer on
ZFS and Oracle 10 ?
The following documents (as well as the blogs from the ZFS developers)
contain some useful information related to database tuning (including
On Jan 18, 2008 7:35 AM, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sengor wrote:
On 1/17/08, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but is ZFS with compression safe to use in a
production environment?
Yes, why wouldn't it be ? If it wasn't safe it wouldn't have been
Howdy,
We are running one write intensive and one read intensive Java process
on a server, and would like to give preferential I/O treatment to the
read intensive process. There was a discussion a while back about
adding throttling measures to ZFS, and I was curious if this feature
allows you to
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
The keynote was given on Wednesday. Any more willingness to discuss
dedup on the list now?
The following video contains a de-duplication overview from Bill and Jeff:
https://slx.sun.com/1179275620
Hope this helps,
- Ryan
26 matches
Mail list logo
