122660-10 does not have any issues that I am aware of. It is only
obsolete, not withdrawn. Additionally, it appears that the circular
patch dependency is by design if you read this BugID:
So how to do you get it to install?
I get...
#patchadd 122660-10
Validating patches...
Loading
You should probably be doing a ZFS clone and backing that up.
I am messing around with zfs snapshots, and was wondering if it is
possible to mount a zfs snapshot. I would like to use this snapshot
to
backup to tape.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
Gimme specific examples and I'll have a look at it.
We (net-snmp) are just about to release a new version (5.4.1) so I'd
like to fix it before it goes to production.
It may be a known bug, since fixed, with 5.0.9.
Not specifically a ZFS question, but is anyone monitoring disk space of
their
MachineMB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
/fastsan/zfs3 (with 3 snapshots and a clone)
100 5414 98.8 31819 58.9 46620 95.4 2895 98.8 100516 99.8
7490.8 172.3
/fastsan/zfs3 (with 1 snapshot and a clone)
100 5316 97.5 65448 99.7 50097 99.0
I have a scenario where I have several ORACLE databases. I'm trying to
keep system downtime to a minimum for business reasons. I've created
zpools on three devices, an internal 148 Gb drive (data) and two
partitions on an HP SAN. HP won't do JBOD so I'm stuck with relying
upon HP to give me a
Mark J Musante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but 'zfs clone' is
exactly
the way to mount a snapshot. Creating a clone uses up a negligible
amount
of disk space, provided you never write to it. And you can always set
readonly=on if that's a concern.
So
Management here is worried about performance under ZFS because they had
a bad experience with Instant Image a number of years ago. When iiamd
was used, server performance was reduced to a crawl. Hence they want
proof in the form of benchmarking that zfs snapshots will not adversely
affect system
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
system manager. This message contains confidential information and is
intended
Would a forcesync flag be something of interest to the community ?
Yes.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
