[zfs-discuss] ZFS boot in snv_90

2008-06-13 Thread Douglas Atique
No, not an issue :-) This is just a thank you note to the ZFS team and all contributors that worked hard to deliver ZFS boot support in snv_90. ZFS is a great achievement for Solaris and operating systems in general, and I believe ZFS boot will make the lives of many, many computer users much

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS mirror with internal and external disks

2007-10-05 Thread Douglas Atique
I'm afraid I asked a very stupid question... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS boot: another way

2007-07-03 Thread Douglas Atique
I'm afraid the Solaris installer won't let me stop the process just before it starts copying files to the target filesystem. It would be very nice to get away with the UFS slice altogether, but between filesystem creation and initialisation (which seems mandatory) and copying there is no pause

[zfs-discuss] ZFS boot: another way

2007-07-02 Thread Douglas Atique
Hi, This is a report of my latest investigations on how to setup (by hand) your ZFS root filesystem. My experiment was carried on with Solaris Express Community Edition b66 DVD and an additional disk slice to temporarily install the root fs to. It takes place during the installation process as

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-15 Thread Douglas Atique
No. There is nothing else the OS can do when it cannot mount the root filesystem. I have the impression (didn't check though) that the pool is made available by just setting some information in its main superblock or something alike (sorry for the imprecisions in ZFS jargon). I understand

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-14 Thread Douglas Atique
Now that I know *what*, could you perhaps explain to my *why*? I understood zpool import and export operations much as mount and unmount, like maybe some checks on the integrity of the pool and updates to some structure on the OS to maintain the imported/exported state of that pool. But now

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-13 Thread Douglas Atique
Once you switch over to zfs root, adding new hardware should just behave as what you expect on ufs root. Copy /devices and /dev is just a one-time thing (as part of 'installation') to setup the initial zfs root. Ok, but what about the first boot? Why can't /devices and /dev be generated

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-13 Thread Douglas Atique
Hi Lin, A few moments after replying to your post, I had an idea. I had tweaked with almost every part of the script but I couldn't figure out what the difference was between the script and the manual execution. The difference is (as I found later) that when I created the ZFS root fs by

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Re: ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-12 Thread Douglas Atique
Hi Doug, I need more information: You need /devices and /dev on zfs root to boot. Right. But can I generate them automatically somehow on the next boot? I have followed the instructions that loop-mount / and tar the contents of devices and dev and untar them to the root pool. I just want

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-11 Thread Douglas Atique
Hi Doug, from the information I read so far, I assume you have c0d0s0 - ufs root c0d0s5 - zfs root pool 'snv' and root filesystem 'b65' Hi Lin, My complete layout follows: c0d0s0: boot slice (holds a manually maintained /boot) -- UFS c0d0s1: the usual swap slice c0d0s3: S10U3 root --

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Boot manual setup in b65

2007-06-04 Thread Douglas Atique
Hi, I have been trying to setup a boot ZFS filesystem since b63 and found out about bug 6553537 that was preventing boot from ZFS filesystems starting from b63. First question is whether b65 has solved the problem as was planned on the bug page. Second question is: as I cannot boot successfully