On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:45:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Shawn,
Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote:
SJ All,
SJ I understand that ZFS gives you more error correction when using
SJ two LUNS from a SAN. But, does it provide you with less features
SJ than UFS
Hello przemolicc,
Friday, December 22, 2006, 10:02:44 AM, you wrote:
ppf On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:45:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Shawn,
Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote:
SJ All,
SJ I understand that ZFS gives you more error correction when using
SJ
Robert Milkowski writes:
Hello przemolicc,
Friday, December 22, 2006, 10:02:44 AM, you wrote:
ppf On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:45:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Shawn,
Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote:
SJ All,
SJ I understand that
Roch - PAE wrote:
The fact that most FS do not manage the disk write caches
does mean you're at risk of data lost for those FS.
Does ZFS? I thought it just turned it on in the places where we had
previously turned if off.
___
zfs-discuss mailing
Hello Torrey,
Friday, December 22, 2006, 9:17:46 PM, you wrote:
TM Roch - PAE wrote:
The fact that most FS do not manage the disk write caches
does mean you're at risk of data lost for those FS.
TM Does ZFS? I thought it just turned it on in the places where we had
TM previously turned if
Robert Milkowski wrote On 12/22/06 13:40,:
Hello Torrey,
Friday, December 22, 2006, 9:17:46 PM, you wrote:
TM Roch - PAE wrote:
The fact that most FS do not manage the disk write caches
does mean you're at risk of data lost for those FS.
TM Does ZFS? I thought it just turned it on in
Hello Shawn,
Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote:
SJ All,
SJ I understand that ZFS gives you more error correction when using
SJ two LUNS from a SAN. But, does it provide you with less features
SJ than UFS does on one LUN from a SAN (i.e is it less stable).
With only one LUN you
