Richard Elling wrote:
Haudy Kazemi wrote:
How would one calculate system reliability estimates here? One is a
RAIDZ set of 6 disks, the other a set of 8. The reliability of each
RAIDZ set by itself isn't too hard to calculate, but put together,
especially since they're different sizes, I
Haudy Kazemi wrote:
How would one calculate system reliability estimates here? One is a
RAIDZ set of 6 disks, the other a set of 8. The reliability of each
RAIDZ set by itself isn't too hard to calculate, but put together,
especially since they're different sizes, I don't know.
We just
After a cup of French coffee, I feel strong enough to recommend :-)
David Smith wrote:
What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of
raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance issues?
It is more complicated and, in general, more complicated is
David Smith wrote:
What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of
raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance issues?
It should be fine. Under some circumstances the performance could be similar
to a pool with all raidz groups of the smallest
Matt,
Thank you for your reply. I like to keep the raidz groups with the same
number of disks but it is not always that easily to have the numbers
work out way.
David
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 14:49 -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
David Smith wrote:
What are your thoughts or recommendations on
What are your thoughts or recommendations on having a zpool made up of
raidz groups of different sizes? Are there going to be performance issues?
For example:
pool: testpool1
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ
