Hello Torrey,
Monday, April 2, 2007, 10:44:42 PM, you wrote:
TM If I create a symlink inside a zfs file system and point the link to a
TM file on a ufs file system on the same node how much space should I
TM expect to see taken in the pool as used? Has this changed in the last
TM few months? I
Hi Robert,
Robert Milkowski wrote On 04/02/07 17:48,:
Right now a symlink should consume one dnode (320 bytes)
dnode_phys_t are actually 512 bytes:
::sizeof dnode_phys_t
sizeof (dnode_phys_t) = 0x200
if the name it point to is less than 67 bytes, otherwise a data block is
allocated
Hello Neil,
Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 2:43:55 PM, you wrote:
NP Hi Robert,
NP Robert Milkowski wrote On 04/02/07 17:48,:
Right now a symlink should consume one dnode (320 bytes)
NP dnode_phys_t are actually 512 bytes:
Yep, right - I mistaken it with bonus buffer size which is 320B.
::sizeof
If I create a symlink inside a zfs file system and point the link to a
file on a ufs file system on the same node how much space should I
expect to see taken in the pool as used? Has this changed in the last
few months? I know work is being done under 6516171 to make symlinks
dittoable but I
