Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3.4.0 Released!

2009-02-03 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 16:20, Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote: Nobody reacted to my E-mail when I asked for feedback. It was extra work and I tried to limit the scope of coding as much as possible. You don't want to know how much time I put into this release as it is. I

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-02-03 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Feb 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Feb 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Mon Feb 2 20:50:11 EST

[Zope-dev] Retiring the Zope SVN trunk? was: Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-02-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Feb 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Feb 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (failures=7) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] Retiring the Zope SVN trunk? was: Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-02-03 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 13:56, Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu wrote: It becomes somewhat hard and annoying to keep the old full Zope trunk tree based on externals in sync with the Zope2 buildout and its KGS definition and it seems I failed yesterday. I'd suggest we reorganize the Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] zope3docs

2009-02-03 Thread Christophe Combelles
Christian Theune a écrit : On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:16:38 -0800 Paul Carduner paulcardu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote: My short-term goal is to produce a document that I can pass to new developers with reasonable confidence that

Re: [Zope-dev] Retiring the Zope SVN trunk? was: Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-02-03 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Lennart Regebro wrote: On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 13:56, Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu wrote: It becomes somewhat hard and annoying to keep the old full Zope trunk tree based on externals in sync with the Zope2 buildout and its KGS definition and it seems I failed yesterday. I'd suggest

Re: [Zope-dev] Retiring the Zope SVN trunk? was: Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-02-03 Thread Stefan H. Holek
I don't think you faired that badly. ;-) One obvious problem is the removal of the 'defaultSkin' directive, which is still in use by CMFDefault. The rest looks harmless. I am not opposed to ditching the trunk, but I don't think keeping it in sync (if only for a transition period) is

Re: [Zope-dev] Retiring the Zope SVN trunk? was: Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-02-03 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03.02.2009 13:56 Uhr, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Feb 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Feb 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests. Test

Re: [Zope-dev] Retiring the Zope SVN trunk? was: Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed

2009-02-03 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 19:44, Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu wrote: It would mean buildout becomes a requirement for the development of Zope2 itself. Oh, +1 to that. For the devlopment with or on top of Zope2 any system that can deal with normal Python distributions would work. In