Neil Bothwick wrote:
make make modules_install make install
make make modules_install install
works just as well and is simpler still. ;)
In fact, I go one step further with:
make make modules_install install reboot
;)
Be lucky,
Neil
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Arnau Bria ar...@emergetux.net wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 21:33:23 +0200
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
when I try to compile a kernel again (meaning after compiling it and
building the modules), I get this error message:
hive linux # make make
this error message:
hive linux # make make modules_install make
just one question about your compiling command, why make ... make?
I just do make all make modules_install ...
I do:
make all
make install
make modules_install
make firmware_install
seperately :)
I do like
Érico Porto wrote:
Ok I will try it.
I used:
make make modules_install make install
Doesn't the modules get made in the make part?
Érico V. Porto
Yep and make install installs them. I use make all for the first one
but I don't think it is required anymore.
Dale
:-) :-)
I try to compile the r1000 module for my laptop.
asus ~ # uname -r
2.6.18-xen
asus ~ # tar xzf r1000_v1.05.tgz
asus ~ # cd r1000_v1.05
asus r1000_v1.05 # make clean modules
make -C src/ clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/r1000_v1.05
On Mon, 11 May 2009 21:33:23 +0200
Marc Blumentritt wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
when I try to compile a kernel again (meaning after compiling it and
building the modules), I get this error message:
hive linux # make make modules_install make
just one question about your compiling command, why make
Francesco Talamona a gentiment tapote:
You missed a step:
make make modules make modules_install
Ciao
Francescoun
I don't think so,
when you run make, your compile kernel and modules.
Then, you just have to run make modules_install.
So make make modules_install is ok.
But, I
Dale wrote:
Érico Porto wrote:
Ok I will try it.
I used:
make make modules_install make install
Doesn't the modules get made in the make part?
Érico V. Porto
Yep and make install installs them. I use make all for the first one
but I don't think it is required anymore.
Dale
type there : modprobe ti_usb_3410_5052 product=f432 vendor=0451
Érico V. Porto
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dale wrote:
Érico Porto wrote:
Ok I will try it.
I used:
make make modules_install make install
Doesn't the modules get made
Trying to compile "cifs" support in the kernel and getting an error during
"make"
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
DESCEND objtool
make[4]: *** No rule to make target
'/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.3.0/include/stddef.h', needed by
'/usr/src/linux-6.1.19-gentoo/to
I am confused: how many 'make install's are there? Don't they 'all' do the
same? Are we talking about a customised (hacked) make install here?
Install is a target to make. Install_modules is a target to make. What's
confusing? Make is a command. Install or install_modules
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:46:02 +0100
Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to compile the r1000 module for my laptop.
[...]
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `modules'. Stop.
You don't compile 2.6 kernel modules with make modules. Just use
make
On 13/06/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
How? make modules_install or the whole thing: make make
modules_install then just modprobe the new module?
# make modules modules_install
# modprobe module
Do you also need to run make install
On 8/12/2009 5:08 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Mittwoch 12 August 2009, Mike Edenfield wrote:
$ make make modules_install make install
too much to type.
make all modules_install install
is much better.
I always forget that the 'all' target (typically) does the same thing as
just
Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Better to run make oldconfig. It merges the changes.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
def...@uberpenguin.net
Yep. I always run make oldconfig then just run make make
modules_install. Once oldconfig is done, the kernel should be
configured and ready to build.
Dale
:-) :-)
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Érico Porto ericoporto2...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I will try it.
I used:
make make modules_install make install
Doesn't the modules get made in the make part?
Yes, you're right. I only use make modules if I'm adding a module to
an existing setup.
Hello list,
I used to run 'make -j24 && make install && make modules-install' and I'd get
kernels in /boot complete with version numbers in their names. Now I'm getting
just vmlinuz and vmlinuz.old.
Has the behaviour of 'make install' changed? If not, I must be doing somethi
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 23:04 +0100, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:46:02 +0100
Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to compile the r1000 module for my laptop.
[...]
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `modules'. Stop.
You don't
.
[...]
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `modules'. Stop.
You don't compile 2.6 kernel modules with make modules. Just use
make, then probably sudo make install.
asus ~ # cd r1000_v1.05
asus r1000_v1.05 # make
make -C src/ clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/root
the r1000 module for my laptop.
[...]
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `modules'. Stop.
You don't compile 2.6 kernel modules with make modules. Just use
make, then probably sudo make install.
asus ~ # cd r1000_v1.05
asus r1000_v1.05 # make
make -C src
Hello,
It seems like I remember that 'make oldconfig' is not
needed any more, to pass the current (booted) kernel
option to the .config for building a new kernel.
Of is 'make oldconfig' still a good idea?
James
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:19:07 +1100, Gabriel Dain wrote:
# cd /usr/src/linux
# make menuconfig
!--- Add whatever support you need, i've never worked with ACPI, sorry
--- # make make modules_install
# reboot
That should be make make modules_install make install or your new
kernel
On Monday 01 May 2006 22:05, maxim wexler wrote:
make
menuconfig, then make make modules_install
You missed a step:
make make modules make modules_install
Ciao
Francesco
--
Linux Version 2.6.16-gentoo-r4, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Apr 26 06:59:58
CEST 2006
One 1.8GHz AMD Athlon 64
I'm compiling a new system (in (chroot) livecd) and trying to compile a new
kernel:
Running:
make && make modules_install
SYNCinclude/config/auto.conf
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscal
Alejandro schrieb:
Why make oldconfig?
To get all new options in your .config.
Is not better just do make and make modules_install?
It is the normal way to do a make make modules_install afterwards.
make oldconfig only can give you problems
NEVER just always hit enter if you were asked
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:24 -, Michael Kintzios wrote:
Yep, /boot is always mounted (just to be sure I won't forget it, I
always mount it before I even cd into /usr/src/linux). Running make
make modules_install does *not* create any links in my /boot directory,
ever. Could
On Thu, 26 May 2005 14:28:25 + (UTC), James wrote:
So using make install a syntax sequence would look like this?
make menuconfig select options and save
make make modules_install
cp arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/kernel-2.6.11-gentoo-r9
cp System.map /boot/System.map-2.6.11-gentoo
From: Hemmann, Volker Armin
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:41 PM
Might I suggest trying the following prior to your normal
(I assume
genkernel) build process.
I don't use genkernel, never have. I did try the following:
copy the .config to another directory, make clean make
Apologies if you're getting this email for the second time. Gmail told
me they'd failed to deliver my original email. So I thought I'd give it
another shot.
Original Message
Subject:re: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make
rule.
Date: Sun, 10 Aug
Hello,
After copying the current ".config" to the newly linked sources
(/usr/src/linux) I use to run 'make oldconfig'. Now, looking at
the gentoo wiki [1] I see (2) choices but no 'make oldconfig'::
1) #make silentoldconfig
2) #make olddefconfig
3) #make oldconfig
(3) still seems t
On 20.04.2007 11:06, Eray Aslan wrote:
[...]
make[4]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/dev-db/mysql-5.0.38/work/mysql/innobase/trx'
Makefile:251: .deps/trx0purge.Po: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** No rule to make target `.deps/trx0purge.Po'. Stop.
make[4]: Leaving directory
Howdy,
I've seen this warning generated for a couple of packages lately.
Messages generated by process 3353 on 2014-07-28 08:45:18 EEST for
package x11-misc/xscreensaver-5.29:
QA: install
QA Notice: make jobserver unavailable:
make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add
files
make[2]: [p_basic.lo] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../../libs/pdcore/libpdcore.la',
needed by `libpdf.la'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/pdflib-5.0.4_p1-r1/work/PDFlib-Lite-5.0.4p1-Unix-src/libs/pdflib'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1
I found this by chance:
http://linux.die.net/man/8/mount
Somewhat different from the output of man mount. What is happening
here? Things like
mount --make-shared mountpoint
mount --make-slave mountpoint
mount --make-private mountpoint
mount --make-unbindable
I'm just now learning how to compile and install manually. I
installed makemkv-1.4.1 manually and now I found an ebuild so I'd like
to install the latest version via the ebuild, but I get:
# make uninstall
make: *** No rule to make target `uninstall'. Stop.
The makefile doesn't mention
On 4/29/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make sure your GNOME packages (esp. gnome-volume-manager and related)
are compiled with USE=hal, and make sure the hal and dbus services are
started. With those in place, it should Just Work(tm).
And also make sure she is a member
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:56:50 +0200
Holly Bostick wrote:
For ages under 2.6, all that's needed is
make
make modules_install
make install or manual copy of the kernel to /boot
yep, and if you forget what is what, there is always
make help
--
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user
On Jul 31, 2011 7:06 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
Is it necessary to first do `make oldconfig`, or is it safe to go
directly to `make
I would like to ask about the kernel 3.0.6. I can't load
the ti_usb_3410_5052.ko. I mean, when I select it in the kernel menu, it
makes fine, but when I type make modules_install, I get an error:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/lib/firmware/./', needed by
`/lib/firmware/ti_3410.fw
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:15:36PM +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 22:05, maxim wexler wrote:
make menuconfig, then make make modules_install
You missed a step:
make make modules make modules_install
Actually, he didn't. The 2.6 series kernels don't require
the following:
copy the .config to another directory,
make clean make mrproper
copy the .config back
make oldconfig
Make
make menuconfig before make (make all modules_install install)
and kick out smbfs. It is deprecated and broken.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 04/18/2016 07:01 PM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After copying the current ".config" to the newly linked sources
> (/usr/src/linux) I use to run 'make oldconfig'. Now, looking at
> the gentoo wiki [1] I see (2) choices but no 'make oldconfig'::
>
> 1) #mak
Hello,
Maybe it is OT, but i am doing it on gentoo.
I am trying to compile gnubatch-1.4 (http://www.gnu.org/s/gnubatch/).
GCC-4.5.3, bison 2.4.3, flex 2.5.35. I get the following error
message:
cd build;make all
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gnubatch/build'
gcc -O -g -Wall -fno-stack
terminated.
make[4]: *** [lucene-wrapper.lo] Error 1
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/net-mail/dovecot-2.1.3/work/dovecot-2.1.3/src/plugins/fts-lucene'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/net-mail
On 14 Feb 2006, at 13:27, Gilberto Martins wrote:
... I tried to compile the kernel
following the guidelines in the handbook, like make menuconfig, make
and make module_install. But it seems the the modules were not
generated.
I tried find /usr/ -iname *3c59x* but only the source code
James wrote:
Hello,
It seems like I remember that 'make oldconfig' is not
needed any more, to pass the current (booted) kernel
option to the .config for building a new kernel.
Of is 'make oldconfig' still a good idea?
James
You still need make oldconfig AFAIK. I copy my
Hello,
Is it OK to use 'make oldmenuconfig' to ensure that the options I had
selected in a 2.6.x kernel also are selected for the newer 2.6. kernel?
Isn't 'make oldmenuconfig' deprecated for 2.6 or does it still work?
Also I perviously used xconfig (make xconfig) in lieu of make menuconfig
Mick wrote:
On 13/06/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
How? make modules_install or the whole thing: make make
modules_install then just modprobe the new module?
# make modules modules_install
# modprobe module
Do you also need to run make install
On 17/06/06, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mick wrote:
On 13/06/06, Ryan Tandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
How? make modules_install or the whole thing: make make
modules_install then just modprobe the new module?
# make modules modules_install
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 05:04:04PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I used to run 'make -j24 && make install && make modules-install' and I'd get
> kernels in /boot complete with version numbers in their names. Now I'm
> getting
> just
Does anyone have any ideas on this compile failure? It's for icedtea6
from the java-overlay:
make[7]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/dev-java/icedtea6-1.3.1-r2/work/icedtea6-1.3.1/openjdk/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product'
make[6]: Leaving directory
Pawel K wrote:
I compiled the kernel with all modules:
make allmodconfig
make
make modules_install
I have udev running on my machine since more than a year.
I created the following section in grub.conf:
title vanilla-all-modules
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/kernel-all-modules root=/dev/hda1
to maintainer to evince.xml.
make[2]: *** [evince-C.omf] Error 10
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make[2]: *** [evince-bg.omf] Error 10
make[2]: *** [evince-el.omf] Error 10
make[2]: *** [evince-es.omf] Error 10
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-text/evince-0.6.1-r3
On Sunday 01 October 2006 01:33, Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov wrote:
I'm trying to compile wine outside of it's source directory manually
and make seems to be broken. The gist is: make needs to build a
makedep tool before the rest of compilation can proceed. However, when
I do 'make depend
/faxhandler.d
esktop
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
Good - your configure finished. Start make now
*** Creating acinclude.m4
make[1]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/kdebluetooth-1.0_beta1-r2/work
On 5/7/23 03:29, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
Trying to compile "cifs" support in the kernel and getting an error
during "make"
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
DESCEND objtool
make[4]: *** No rule to make target
'/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.3.0/inclu
Hi group,
digg.com announces this is firefox download day, so I got the tarball and
unwrapped in my home dir.
According to this
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Configuring_Build_Options
I'm supposed to make a .mozconfig file first then, not sure, run ./mozconfig?
It doesn't say. Doesn't
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:49:04 +0200
Luigi Pinna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alle giovedì 19 luglio 2007, Billy McCann ha scritto:
[...]
2. Copy old .config and make. In this case you miss any
new kernel options.
[...]
That is no true.
If you copy your old .config and give make
2009/1/23 Norberto Bensa nbe...@gmail.com
Quoting Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net:
Than he has a non solvable problem recovering his config. But, who will
remove this option?
Not remove, but someone (me for example) could make it =m ;-)
In that case you just do:
modprobe configs
gunzip
Grant emailgr...@gmail.com writes:
I'm just now learning how to compile and install manually. I
installed makemkv-1.4.1 manually and now I found an ebuild so I'd like
to install the latest version via the ebuild, but I get:
# make uninstall
make: *** No rule to make target `uninstall
I'm just now learning how to compile and install manually. I
installed makemkv-1.4.1 manually and now I found an ebuild so I'd like
to install the latest version via the ebuild, but I get:
# make uninstall
make: *** No rule to make target `uninstall'. Stop.
The makefile doesn't mention
Hi -
(I posted this on gentoo-perl in error - am reposting
here - sorry)
I'm developing some ebuild scripts, and came across
a problem. I have enabled tests and when an ebuild
test fails, it is not dieing but going adhead and doing
the install.
In the src_test function, I have:
...
make test
make help
and i thinks its oldconfig, not oldmenuconfig ?
On Thu, 26 May 2005 01:16:20 + (UTC)
James wrote:
Hello,
Is it OK to use 'make oldmenuconfig' to ensure that the options I had
selected in a 2.6.x kernel also are selected for the newer 2.6. kernel?
Isn't 'make
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 07:53, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
make[1]: *** [archival/built-in.o] Ошибка 127
make: *** [archival] Ошибка 2
make: *** Ожидание завершения заданий...
make[1]: *** [applets/busybox.o] Ошибка 127
make[1]: *** Ожидание завершения заданий...
make
The error is:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../scintilla/libscintilla.a',
needed by `test-scintilla'. Stop.
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
mv -f .deps/LexVB.Tpo .deps/LexVB.Po
mv -f .deps/test_scintilla-test-scintilla.Tpo
.deps/test_scintilla-test-scintilla.Po
make[3
Run a make clean on the kernel source tree and then a make
make modules_install and see what happens. Perhaps that will solve it.
-MikeOn 8/2/05, James Hiscock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a forgotten make mrproper or make clean before a full build? Aren't they for 2.4.x kernels? I'm
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
I think you can say make `oldconfig' and the `old config' is supposed to
be incorporated so no I didn't
If I had put .confg into the new sources, then plain make menuconfig
is what I would have used.
That is the wrong way round! make oldconfig uses
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0).
Is it necessary to first do `make oldconfig`, or is it safe to go
directly to `make
I don't think this is Gentoo-specific, but I've noticed that a recent
update to make is causing makefile breakage. For example, trying to
build a Linux 2.6.28 kernel:
beta linux-2.6.28-gentoo-r5 # make oldconfig
Makefile:442: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.
Apparently
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:00:52 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
AFAICT the only time depmod runs is during the modules_install
phase. Do you do make modules_install when building a kernel?
I'm lazy. I have 2 scripts sitting in /usr/src which I run from
/usr/src/linux. After running make
On 05/22/2015 02:19 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/05/2015 10:38, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2015 02:53:17 -0500, Dale wrote:
So I'm the 3rd one in row to state that I haven't had any deleterious
effects that I noticed.
Make that 4.
/raises hand:
5
/raises hand too
;> CC fs/ext4/mmp.o
>>>>> CC fs/ext4/indirect.o
>>>>> fs/ext4/indirect.o: warning: objtool: ext4_clear_blocks()+0x242: can't
>>>>> find jump dest instruction at .text+0x56c
>>>>> CC fs/ext4/extents_status.o
&g
>>>>>> find jump dest instruction at .text+0x56c
>>>>>> CC fs/ext4/extents_status.o
>>>>>> /bin/sh: line 1: 31735 Segmentation fault ./tools/objtool/objtool
>>>>>> check "fs/ext4/extents_status.o"
>>>&g
g: objtool: ext4_clear_blocks()+0x242: can't
>>>> find jump dest instruction at .text+0x56c
>>>> CC fs/ext4/extents_status.o
>>>> /bin/sh: line 1: 31735 Segmentation fault ./tools/objtool/objtool
>>>> check "fs/ext4/extents_stat
Hi,
I'm getting this errorn when trying to emerge pidgin:
gcc-config error: Could not run/locate i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
make[6]: *** [blib/arch/auto/Purple/Purple.so] Error 1
make[6]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/net-im/pidgin-2.5.2/work/pidgin-2.5.2/libpurple/plugins/perl/common'
make[5
Hello,
app-i18n/scim-qtimm-0.9.4 fails to configure, whereas the previous
version has no trouble. What is the cause of this problem?
- Neil
== log ==
*** Creating acinclude.m4
make[1]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/scim-qtimm-0.9.4/work/scim-qtimm-0.9.4'
make[1]: Leaving
* meino.cra...@gmx.de meino.cra...@gmx.de [120309 14:54]:
Hi,
I am trying to compile a linux-kernel for an embedded system.
There is an (older) build environment.
The kernel is based on a 2.4er linux kernel.
When doing a
make menuconfig
I get:
make menuconfig
Makefile:441
-20200209T214502Z.tar.xz
into a VirtualBox running on a Ryzen 3 3200G
and got this when running genkernel:
CC [M] drivers/ssb/scan.o
gcc: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1
compilation terminated.
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:303:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.o
I'm trying to compile wine outside of it's source directory manually
and make seems to be broken. The gist is: make needs to build a
makedep tool before the rest of compilation can proceed. However, when
I do 'make depend' it starts using makedep which doesn't exist yet. A
wine developer keeps
I haven't been able to build sane-backends.
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libsane-sane-epson2.la', needed by
`all'. Stop.
any thoughts?
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
$ make modules
Please use just make in 2.6.x kernels. Should work then.
Greetings,
Sascha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Arnau Bria schrieb:
hive linux # make make modules_install make
just one question about your compiling command, why make ... make?
I just do make all make modules_install ...
I used this command only to show the problem I have. I have a special
setup, where I place nearly the complete
On Tuesday 12 May 2009, Marc Blumentritt wrote:
Arnau Bria schrieb:
hive linux # make make modules_install make
just one question about your compiling command, why make ... make?
I just do make all make modules_install ...
I used this command only to show the problem I have. I have
Hello,
please can help me with following error? Please just let me know what to look
for.
emerging sys-apps/dbus-0.23.4-r1:
ImportError: No module named Pyrex.Compiler.Main
make[3]: [dbus_bindings.c] Error 1 (ignored)
...
gcc: dbus_bindings.c: No such file or directory
gcc: no input files
make[3
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:05:24 -, Michael Kintzios wrote:
Yep, /boot is always mounted (just to be sure I won't forget it, I
always mount it before I even cd into /usr/src/linux). Running make
make modules_install does *not* create any links in my /boot directory
On 5/25/05, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is it OK to use 'make oldmenuconfig' to ensure that the options I had
selected in a 2.6.x kernel also are selected for the newer 2.6. kernel?
Isn't 'make oldmenuconfig' deprecated for 2.6 or does it still work?
Also I perviously used
oldconfig usually works for minor version changes - just don't use it to
go from say a 2.4 to 2.6.
xconfig needs qt installed - I get an error about qt when I try to run it.
*
* Unable to find the QT installation. Please make sure that the
* QT development package is correctly installed
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 14:07 +, James wrote:
Nick Rout nick at rout.co.nz writes:
make help lists the config tools
Surely you jest?
no i wouldn't make the same suggestion twice to be ignored or make a
joke (LOL make joke ?)
you need to be in /usr/src/linux - and I think make help
Hi there,
Is there any one out there that knows what this means and how to fix it?
libtool: link: `/usr/lib64/libGL.la' is not a valid libtool archive
make[3]: *** [kcm_info.la] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/kdebase-3.5.2-r1/work/kdebase-3.5.2/kcontrol/info'
make[2
I can't emerge vlc because I miss a dependency, this is the message:
[...]
make[2]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/vlc-0.8.1-r1/work/vlc-0.8.1/mozilla'
/usr/bin/xpidl -I/usr/share/idl/mozilla \
-I/usr/lib/mozilla/include/idl \
-m header -o vlcintf ./vlcintf.idl
make[2]: /usr/bin/xpidl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:06:17 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote about
[gentoo-user] make oldconfig necessary?:
Let's say I have a .config from an older kernel version (for example,
2.6.38), and now I want to install a newer kernel (let's say, 3.0
Ok I will try it.
I used:
make make modules_install make install
Doesn't the modules get made in the make part?
Érico V. Porto
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Aljosha Papsch papsch...@googlemail.comwrote:
2011/11/6 Érico Porto ericoporto2...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I would like to ask
Michael Mol writes:
http://funnybutnot.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/optimizing-parallel-builds/
404, but http://funnybutnot.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/ seems to work.
Wonko
El Dom, 1 de Febrero de 2009, 18:27, Tom escribió:
Does this then create a bzImage-versionstring file, and make install
copies this to /boot/kernel-versionstring (and system.map and .config
respectably)?
Yes.
Also how exactly do you then need to build the kernel.
Does a simple 'make
On Saturday 18 February 2006 09:52, Rafael Fernández López wrote:
./configure ; make ; make install (in an app called 'whatever') and it
could create for example /home/me/bin/whatever and
/home/me/share/doc/whatever or
/home/me/doc/whatever, and so on.
This is what --prefix is for.
./configure
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes.
cd /usr/src/linux
make menuconfig or make xconfig
choose the module option you wish to enable
Select whether to build into the kernel or as a module.
exit and save
make
make modules_install
You should not have to copy bzImage unless you built your
Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I rolled up a new kernel after I ran make oldconfig and noticed this little
message:
[...]
WARNING: modpost: Found 5 section mismatch(es).
To see full details build your kernel with:
'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
[...]
What's it telling me? Is this something I
2008/8/4, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
It seems like I remember that 'make oldconfig' is not
needed any more, to pass the current (booted) kernel
option to the .config for building a new kernel.
Of is 'make oldconfig' still a good idea?
James
At least in the kernel Makefile
At Sun, 09 Oct 2005 07:56:18 +0200 Francesco Talamona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 09 October 2005 04:37, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
make
make install#I don't have any modules
In such cases first of all do a make oldconfig.
Really? I did make menuconfig and have never used oldconfig
hi,
I have found that, even after various attempts, I can not make my system use the new kernel I have just compiled.
I proceeded in the following order:
first:
emerge gentoo-sources
then:
cd /usr/src
ls
linux linux-2.6.13-gentoo-r5
ln -sf linux-2.6.13-gentoo-r5 linux
then:
make menuconfig
1 - 100 of 32927 matches
Mail list logo
