Berin Lautenbach wrote:
- tests now run
They didn't before? I changed it to not rely on a junit.jar in the lib
directory, but instead on a junit included in the ant lib directory.
But I noticed that you put the junit jar back into the classpath.
Didn't it work for you? Or did you not have junit in your ant lib
directory?
Oops. My deepest apologies - they did work. What didn't work was the
specific tests (ant -f build-ant1.5 test_xenc). I got them working, but
it was a very minor change.
The ant one works fine if you are using a <junit> task (which is how ant
test works), but the test_xenc stuff calles junit from a java task.
Probably the cleaner way to fix it would be to set up test_xenc as a junit
task.
I was also wondering why you had a commented out <!--path
refid="id.classpath.coverage" /--> in your id.classpath, where I didn't
have it in the original, but maybe I have commented it out in the
meantime :)
I don't *think* I touched that. I also just checked the cvs record (BTW -
did I tell people that the cvs mailing list is now archived at
xml.apache.org/mail/security-cvs ?) and it doesn't appear I changed it, so
I'm blaming you <GRIN>.
In any case I am fairly certain it can go :)
- header at startup (version etc.)
- build src and distribution archives
- external call to forrest to build docs
Could people have a look? I've tried to strip everything right back
to basics, but there may be simpler/cleaner ways to do things, so feel
free to comment and/or change directly!
Well.. I have been playing around with making 3 build files to split up
functionality.
How about we have seperate build files for:
- Samples
- Distributions
- Normal development (compile, test etc)
I like that. I assume they would all be included into the one high level
build.xml? My only constraint woudl be can we wait until post 1.1? I'm
already wary that I'm doing some large changes to the build file just
prior to release.
+1.
Are we happy to move to this as the formal build.xml?
I can't wait to get rid of the beast :)
<GRIN>. I'll take that as a +1. It's got +1 from me as well. If I get
no vetos, lets make the change. We can rename the old one
build-ant.deprecated or some such.
I was sick of build.xml eons ago - that is why I started
build-ant1.5.xml. The world would be a better place without
xml-security/build.xml. +1 to kill it.
Cheers,
Berin
