+1 (non-binding) to kill the build.xml +1 to rename build-ant1.5.xml to build.xml :)
-- dims --- Axl Mattheus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Berin Lautenbach wrote: > > >>>- tests now run > >>> > >>> > >>They didn't before? I changed it to not rely on a junit.jar in the lib > >>directory, but instead on a junit included in the ant lib directory. > >>But I noticed that you put the junit jar back into the classpath. > >>Didn't it work for you? Or did you not have junit in your ant lib > >>directory? > >> > >> > > > > > >Oops. My deepest apologies - they did work. What didn't work was the > >specific tests (ant -f build-ant1.5 test_xenc). I got them working, but > >it was a very minor change. > > > >The ant one works fine if you are using a <junit> task (which is how ant > >test works), but the test_xenc stuff calles junit from a java task. > >Probably the cleaner way to fix it would be to set up test_xenc as a junit > >task. > > > > > > > >>I was also wondering why you had a commented out <!--path > >>refid="id.classpath.coverage" /--> in your id.classpath, where I didn't > >> have it in the original, but maybe I have commented it out in the > >>meantime :) > >> > >> > > > > > >I don't *think* I touched that. I also just checked the cvs record (BTW - > >did I tell people that the cvs mailing list is now archived at > >xml.apache.org/mail/security-cvs ?) and it doesn't appear I changed it, so > >I'm blaming you <GRIN>. > > > > > > > >>In any case I am fairly certain it can go :) > >> > >> > >> > >>>- header at startup (version etc.) > >>>- build src and distribution archives > >>>- external call to forrest to build docs > >>> > >>>Could people have a look? I've tried to strip everything right back > >>>to basics, but there may be simpler/cleaner ways to do things, so feel > >>>free to comment and/or change directly! > >>> > >>> > >>Well.. I have been playing around with making 3 build files to split up > >> functionality. > >> > >>How about we have seperate build files for: > >> > >>- Samples > >>- Distributions > >>- Normal development (compile, test etc) > >> > >> > > > > > >I like that. I assume they would all be included into the one high level > >build.xml? My only constraint woudl be can we wait until post 1.1? I'm > >already wary that I'm doing some large changes to the build file just > >prior to release. > > > > > +1. > > > > > > >>>Are we happy to move to this as the formal build.xml? > >>> > >>> > >>I can't wait to get rid of the beast :) > >> > >> > > > > > ><GRIN>. I'll take that as a +1. It's got +1 from me as well. If I get > >no vetos, lets make the change. We can rename the old one > >build-ant.deprecated or some such. > > > > > I was sick of build.xml eons ago - that is why I started > build-ant1.5.xml. The world would be a better place without > xml-security/build.xml. +1 to kill it. > > >Cheers, > > Berin > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
