Hi,
Are we supposed to officially now use svn instead of cvs for
xml-security? I ask because I am going to be doing some commits soon and
I want to make sure they are not lost. The xml-security cvs repository
is still there. If we have officially switched to use svn should we shut
down the cvs repository (or at least make it read-only)?
Thanks,
Sean
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
thanks hen.
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done (dims' +1').
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/security
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/security/trunk xml-security
Commit mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Same list of user's with rw access as in CVS
Hen
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
So good to do the real thing?
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Henri Yandell wrote:
Okay, here's a test run:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/xml/security
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/xml/security/trunk xml-security
Authorization and email notification both look like they'll be simple.
So take a look at the test repository above, and if it looks okay let me
know and I can go ahead and do the real thing.
Hen
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
+1!
Henri Yandell wrote:
So good to go with the migration? :)
Hen
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me.
On 10/13/05, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any preferences guys? What is below looks fine to me!
Cheers,
Berin
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: xml-security -> SVN?
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:22:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Berin,
Any thoughts on how you'd like the xml-security CVS module migrated to
Subversion? Jeremais directed me to you to find out if you had any
thoughts on the matter.
Is a standard strategy okay:
xml/
security/
trunk/
tags/
branches/
?
Hen
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
