There is no sync...cvs is gone for good! -- dims
On 12/22/05, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the old xml-security cvs repository frozen or is there some sort of > periodic update to keep svn and cvs in synch? I need to know if I need > to convert my ant cvs tasks to svn to pick up the latest changes. > > Thanks, > Sean > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > cvs should be read-only at this time :) > > > > On 12/12/05, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>Are we supposed to officially now use svn instead of cvs for > >>xml-security? I ask because I am going to be doing some commits soon and > >>I want to make sure they are not lost. The xml-security cvs repository > >>is still there. If we have officially switched to use svn should we shut > >>down the cvs repository (or at least make it read-only)? > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Sean > >> > >>Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> > >>>thanks hen. > >>> > >>>On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Done (dims' +1'). > >>>> > >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/security > >>>> > >>>>svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/security/trunk xml-security > >>>> > >>>>Commit mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>>Same list of user's with rw access as in CVS > >>>> > >>>>Hen > >>>> > >>>>On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Henri Yandell wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>So good to do the real thing? > >>>>> > >>>>>On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Henri Yandell wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Okay, here's a test run: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/xml/security > >>>>>> > >>>>>>svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/xml/security/trunk xml-security > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Authorization and email notification both look like they'll be simple. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>So take a look at the test repository above, and if it looks okay let me > >>>>>>know and I can go ahead and do the real thing. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Hen > >>>>>> > >>>>>>On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Berin Lautenbach wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>+1! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Henri Yandell wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>So good to go with the migration? :) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>Hen > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>+1 from me. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>On 10/13/05, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Any preferences guys? What is below looks fine to me! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>> Berin > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>-------- Original Message -------- > >>>>>>>>>>Subject: xml-security -> SVN? > >>>>>>>>>>Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:22:45 -0400 (EDT) > >>>>>>>>>>From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>>To: Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Hi Berin, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Any thoughts on how you'd like the xml-security CVS module migrated > >>>>>>>>>>to > >>>>>>>>>>Subversion? Jeremais directed me to you to find out if you had any > >>>>>>>>>>thoughts on the matter. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Is a standard strategy okay: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>xml/ > >>>>>>>>>> security/ > >>>>>>>>>> trunk/ > >>>>>>>>>> tags/ > >>>>>>>>>> branches/ > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>Hen > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>-- > >>>>>>>>>Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
