On (2003/07/17 15:34), Chuck Simpson wrote:

> I had only checked RFC 822 and not 1035. But since I don't control the
> internal network I will have to live with the unfortunate host name
> choice and modify James so I can use it on my workstation.

This real world requirement led to an option being added to the Exim
MTA, specifically allowing these broken hostnames.  It's a generalized,
additive option called helo_allow_chars.

It's all very well boasting strict RFC conformance in an academic
environment, but there aren't many business managers willing to accept
"Well, your correspondants must fix their mail server" for a significant
number of their correspondants.

And anyway, the spirit of interpretation for RFCs should always be "Be
conservative with what you send and liberal with what you accept".

Ciao,
Sheldon.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to